Sepsis in Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: Risk Factors, Pathophysiology, and Outcomes.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2026-08-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S620940
Meiyi Tian, Zhuo Sun, Yang Zhang, Jian Liu
{"title":"Sepsis in Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: Risk Factors, Pathophysiology, and Outcomes.","authors":"Meiyi Tian, Zhuo Sun, Yang Zhang, Jian Liu","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S620940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sepsis remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs), with distinct time-dependent outcomes that differ across disease subtypes, sepsis definitions, immune phenotypes, and follow-up time horizons. Chronic immune dysregulation, disease-specific cytokine signatures, cumulative organ damage, and dose- and duration-dependent immunosuppressive therapies render this population particularly vulnerable to sepsis. Evidence indicates that ARDs and sepsis share overlapping immunopathological mechanisms, including cytokine dysregulation, disease-dependent neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) abnormalities, Treg/Th17 imbalance, endotoxin-related immune tolerance, and phenotype-specific immune suppression. However, the functional consequences of these shared pathways diverge substantially by ARD subtype and disease activity. Whether ARDs independently influence sepsis susceptibility and clinical outcomes remains controversial, largely due to heterogeneity in sepsis definitions, endpoint variability, and incomplete confounder control. In this systematic review with narrative synthesis, conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidance (87 studies included), we synthesize current epidemiological, genetic, and mechanistic evidence and discuss risk-management and healthcare-policy implications. We summarize disease-related, immune-related, treatment-related, demographic, and healthcare-system risk factors, stratified by evidence strength and specificity to ARDs, and critically evaluate the time-dependent mortality paradox: preserved or improved short-term survival in certain ARDs versus substantially elevated long-term mortality. A deeper understanding of these complex interactions, including pathogen spectra, vaccination status, and modifiable risk factors, may facilitate the development of clinically actionable risk stratification tools, inform personalized therapeutic decision-making, and improve both short- and long-term outcomes in this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"19 ","pages":"620940"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13468303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S620940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sepsis remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs), with distinct time-dependent outcomes that differ across disease subtypes, sepsis definitions, immune phenotypes, and follow-up time horizons. Chronic immune dysregulation, disease-specific cytokine signatures, cumulative organ damage, and dose- and duration-dependent immunosuppressive therapies render this population particularly vulnerable to sepsis. Evidence indicates that ARDs and sepsis share overlapping immunopathological mechanisms, including cytokine dysregulation, disease-dependent neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) abnormalities, Treg/Th17 imbalance, endotoxin-related immune tolerance, and phenotype-specific immune suppression. However, the functional consequences of these shared pathways diverge substantially by ARD subtype and disease activity. Whether ARDs independently influence sepsis susceptibility and clinical outcomes remains controversial, largely due to heterogeneity in sepsis definitions, endpoint variability, and incomplete confounder control. In this systematic review with narrative synthesis, conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidance (87 studies included), we synthesize current epidemiological, genetic, and mechanistic evidence and discuss risk-management and healthcare-policy implications. We summarize disease-related, immune-related, treatment-related, demographic, and healthcare-system risk factors, stratified by evidence strength and specificity to ARDs, and critically evaluate the time-dependent mortality paradox: preserved or improved short-term survival in certain ARDs versus substantially elevated long-term mortality. A deeper understanding of these complex interactions, including pathogen spectra, vaccination status, and modifiable risk factors, may facilitate the development of clinically actionable risk stratification tools, inform personalized therapeutic decision-making, and improve both short- and long-term outcomes in this high-risk population.

自身免疫性风湿病中的败血症:危险因素、病理生理学和结果。
脓毒症仍然是自身免疫性风湿性疾病(ARDs)患者发病和死亡的主要原因,其不同的时间依赖性结果因疾病亚型、脓毒症定义、免疫表型和随访时间范围而异。慢性免疫失调、疾病特异性细胞因子特征、累积器官损伤以及剂量和持续时间依赖的免疫抑制治疗使这一人群特别容易患败血症。有证据表明,ARDs和败血症具有重叠的免疫病理机制,包括细胞因子失调、疾病依赖性中性粒细胞胞外陷阱(NET)异常、Treg/Th17失衡、内毒素相关免疫耐受和表型特异性免疫抑制。然而,这些共享通路的功能结果因ARD亚型和疾病活动性而有很大差异。ARDs是否独立影响脓毒症的易感性和临床结果仍然存在争议,主要是由于脓毒症定义的异质性、终点可变性和不完全混杂对照。根据PRISMA 2020指南(包括87项研究),我们综合了当前的流行病学、遗传学和机制证据,并讨论了风险管理和卫生保健政策的影响。我们总结了疾病相关的、免疫相关的、治疗相关的、人口统计学的和医疗保健系统的危险因素,根据证据强度和ARDs的特异性进行分层,并批判性地评估了时间依赖性死亡率悖论:某些ARDs患者的短期生存得以维持或改善,而长期死亡率却大幅提高。更深入地了解这些复杂的相互作用,包括病原体谱、疫苗接种状况和可改变的危险因素,可能有助于开发临床可操作的风险分层工具,为个性化治疗决策提供信息,并改善这一高危人群的短期和长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书