{"title":"Sepsis in Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: Risk Factors, Pathophysiology, and Outcomes.","authors":"Meiyi Tian, Zhuo Sun, Yang Zhang, Jian Liu","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S620940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sepsis remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs), with distinct time-dependent outcomes that differ across disease subtypes, sepsis definitions, immune phenotypes, and follow-up time horizons. Chronic immune dysregulation, disease-specific cytokine signatures, cumulative organ damage, and dose- and duration-dependent immunosuppressive therapies render this population particularly vulnerable to sepsis. Evidence indicates that ARDs and sepsis share overlapping immunopathological mechanisms, including cytokine dysregulation, disease-dependent neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) abnormalities, Treg/Th17 imbalance, endotoxin-related immune tolerance, and phenotype-specific immune suppression. However, the functional consequences of these shared pathways diverge substantially by ARD subtype and disease activity. Whether ARDs independently influence sepsis susceptibility and clinical outcomes remains controversial, largely due to heterogeneity in sepsis definitions, endpoint variability, and incomplete confounder control. In this systematic review with narrative synthesis, conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidance (87 studies included), we synthesize current epidemiological, genetic, and mechanistic evidence and discuss risk-management and healthcare-policy implications. We summarize disease-related, immune-related, treatment-related, demographic, and healthcare-system risk factors, stratified by evidence strength and specificity to ARDs, and critically evaluate the time-dependent mortality paradox: preserved or improved short-term survival in certain ARDs versus substantially elevated long-term mortality. A deeper understanding of these complex interactions, including pathogen spectra, vaccination status, and modifiable risk factors, may facilitate the development of clinically actionable risk stratification tools, inform personalized therapeutic decision-making, and improve both short- and long-term outcomes in this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"19 ","pages":"620940"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13468303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S620940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sepsis remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs), with distinct time-dependent outcomes that differ across disease subtypes, sepsis definitions, immune phenotypes, and follow-up time horizons. Chronic immune dysregulation, disease-specific cytokine signatures, cumulative organ damage, and dose- and duration-dependent immunosuppressive therapies render this population particularly vulnerable to sepsis. Evidence indicates that ARDs and sepsis share overlapping immunopathological mechanisms, including cytokine dysregulation, disease-dependent neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) abnormalities, Treg/Th17 imbalance, endotoxin-related immune tolerance, and phenotype-specific immune suppression. However, the functional consequences of these shared pathways diverge substantially by ARD subtype and disease activity. Whether ARDs independently influence sepsis susceptibility and clinical outcomes remains controversial, largely due to heterogeneity in sepsis definitions, endpoint variability, and incomplete confounder control. In this systematic review with narrative synthesis, conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidance (87 studies included), we synthesize current epidemiological, genetic, and mechanistic evidence and discuss risk-management and healthcare-policy implications. We summarize disease-related, immune-related, treatment-related, demographic, and healthcare-system risk factors, stratified by evidence strength and specificity to ARDs, and critically evaluate the time-dependent mortality paradox: preserved or improved short-term survival in certain ARDs versus substantially elevated long-term mortality. A deeper understanding of these complex interactions, including pathogen spectra, vaccination status, and modifiable risk factors, may facilitate the development of clinically actionable risk stratification tools, inform personalized therapeutic decision-making, and improve both short- and long-term outcomes in this high-risk population.
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.