A Pilot Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial of Repeated High-Dose Intravenous Magnesium Sulphate and High-Dose Nebulized Budesonide for Severe Asthma in the Paediatric Emergency Department

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Journal of paediatrics and child health Pub Date : 2026-10-15 Epub Date: 2026-08-16 DOI:10.1111/jpc.70530
Khalid Alansari, Fatin Abou Moussa, Hadi Abu Rasheed, Bruce L. Davidson, Khalid Yousif Ibrahim, Mahmoud Alrifaai
{"title":"A Pilot Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial of Repeated High-Dose Intravenous Magnesium Sulphate and High-Dose Nebulized Budesonide for Severe Asthma in the Paediatric Emergency Department","authors":"Khalid Alansari,&nbsp;Fatin Abou Moussa,&nbsp;Hadi Abu Rasheed,&nbsp;Bruce L. Davidson,&nbsp;Khalid Yousif Ibrahim,&nbsp;Mahmoud Alrifaai","doi":"10.1111/jpc.70530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Determine if high-dose intravenous magnesium with/without nebulized budesonide for children with acute severe asthma is safe and reduces time to medical readiness for discharge compared to standard intravenous magnesium.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Either 2 doses of intravenous magnesium or 1 dose and placebo, each with/without high-dose nebulized budesonide, were given in a double-blind randomized trial to study patients in addition to standard-of-care asthma treatment. Time to medical readiness for discharge was the primary outcome. The proportion of patients discharged at 12, 18, and 24 h, asthma severity scores at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h, and safety of high-dose magnesium were secondary outcomes. Follow-up was 1 week.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Covid-19 intervened to stop recuitment at 70% of the estimated 218 children planned. Primary and secondary results were similar for the 4 groups. High-dose magnesium was safe on clinical and laboratory assessment. Exploratory analysis combining IV high-dose magnesium groups compared to standard magnesium showed improvement of discharge ratio at 12 h for the former. 40/78 patients (51.2%) in high-dose magnesium versus 26/75 patients (34.6%) in the standard magnesium arms ready for discharge, <i>p</i> = 0.038, absolute risk reduction 16.6%,95% CI, 0.93% to 31.1%. There was a trend toward improvement of PRAM score at 4 and 8 h in the nebulized budesonide groups compared to placebo and no significant difference in seeking post-discharge outpatient or need for inpatient care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>High-dose magnesium appeared safe with only a modest possible benefit of medical readiness for discharge at 12 h. There was a reduction in asthma severity score at 4 and 8 h from nebulized budesonide.</p>\n \n <p>\n <b>Trial Registration:</b> clinicaltrials.gov, ID #NCT 02455687</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","volume":"62 10","pages":"1948-1958"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpc.70530","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpc.70530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Determine if high-dose intravenous magnesium with/without nebulized budesonide for children with acute severe asthma is safe and reduces time to medical readiness for discharge compared to standard intravenous magnesium.

Methods

Either 2 doses of intravenous magnesium or 1 dose and placebo, each with/without high-dose nebulized budesonide, were given in a double-blind randomized trial to study patients in addition to standard-of-care asthma treatment. Time to medical readiness for discharge was the primary outcome. The proportion of patients discharged at 12, 18, and 24 h, asthma severity scores at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h, and safety of high-dose magnesium were secondary outcomes. Follow-up was 1 week.

Results

Covid-19 intervened to stop recuitment at 70% of the estimated 218 children planned. Primary and secondary results were similar for the 4 groups. High-dose magnesium was safe on clinical and laboratory assessment. Exploratory analysis combining IV high-dose magnesium groups compared to standard magnesium showed improvement of discharge ratio at 12 h for the former. 40/78 patients (51.2%) in high-dose magnesium versus 26/75 patients (34.6%) in the standard magnesium arms ready for discharge, p = 0.038, absolute risk reduction 16.6%,95% CI, 0.93% to 31.1%. There was a trend toward improvement of PRAM score at 4 and 8 h in the nebulized budesonide groups compared to placebo and no significant difference in seeking post-discharge outpatient or need for inpatient care.

Conclusions

High-dose magnesium appeared safe with only a modest possible benefit of medical readiness for discharge at 12 h. There was a reduction in asthma severity score at 4 and 8 h from nebulized budesonide.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, ID #NCT 02455687

儿科急诊科反复大剂量静脉注射硫酸镁和大剂量雾化布地奈德治疗重度哮喘的一项安慰剂对照随机试验
目的:确定布地奈德雾化治疗急性重症哮喘儿童的大剂量静脉注射镁是否安全,与标准静脉注射镁相比,是否缩短了出院准备时间。方法:在一项双盲随机试验中,在标准护理哮喘治疗的基础上,给予2剂静脉镁或1剂安慰剂,每剂加/不加高剂量布地奈德雾化治疗。医疗准备出院的时间是主要的结果。12、18和24小时出院的患者比例,4、8、12和24小时的哮喘严重程度评分,以及大剂量镁的安全性是次要结局。随访1周。结果:Covid-19干预导致计划招募的218名儿童中有70%停止招募。4组的主要和次要结果相似。高剂量镁经临床和实验室评价是安全的。结合静脉注射高剂量镁组与标准镁组的探索性分析,前者在12 h时的放电比有所改善。高剂量镁组40/78例(51.2%)患者准备出院,标准镁组26/75例(34.6%)患者准备出院,p = 0.038,绝对风险降低16.6%,95% CI, 0.93% ~ 31.1%。与安慰剂组相比,布地奈德雾化组在4和8小时的PRAM评分有改善的趋势,在出院后寻求门诊治疗或住院治疗方面没有显著差异。结论:大剂量镁似乎是安全的,只有在12小时的医疗准备出院时可能有适度的好处。布地奈德雾化治疗后4和8小时哮喘严重程度评分降低。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov, ID #NCT02455687。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
487
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health publishes original research articles of scientific excellence in paediatrics and child health. Research Articles, Case Reports and Letters to the Editor are published, together with invited Reviews, Annotations, Editorial Comments and manuscripts of educational interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书