Long-term use of dual orexin receptor antagonists for the treatment of insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-13 DOI:10.1055/s-0046-1827049
Luis Miguel Moraes Araujo, Arthur Duarte de Sousa, Camila de Carvalho Vieira, João Pedro Pimentel Abreu, Cristiane Fiquene Conti, Melaine Mont'Alverne Lawall Silva, Marcio Moyses de Oliveira
{"title":"Long-term use of dual orexin receptor antagonists for the treatment of insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Luis Miguel Moraes Araujo, Arthur Duarte de Sousa, Camila de Carvalho Vieira, João Pedro Pimentel Abreu, Cristiane Fiquene Conti, Melaine Mont'Alverne Lawall Silva, Marcio Moyses de Oliveira","doi":"10.1055/s-0046-1827049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Insomnia is a prevalent disorder associated with impaired daytime functioning and reduced quality of life. Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) have shown favorable short-term efficacy and safety profiles. However, evidence regarding their long-term (≥ 6 months) effects remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesize the available evidence on prolonged DORA use in adults with chronic insomnia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Adults with primary insomnia treated with DORAs (suvorexant, lemborexant, or daridorexant) approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for ≥ 6 months were included. The outcomes included patient-reported sleep parameters, adverse events, and treatment discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 6 randomized controlled trials comprising 3,546 participants. After 6 and 12 months, DORAs improved subjective sleep parameters of efficacy. Overall, DORAs showed adverse events similar to those of placebo at 6 months, but higher rates at 12 months. The overall rate of discontinuation due to adverse events did not differ significantly, although higher doses of certain DORAs increased the discontinuation rate at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In chronic insomnia, DORAs provide sustained improvements in key subjective sleep outcomes, with overall acceptable safety and tolerability profiles. Higher doses may be less well tolerated. Additional long-term randomized trials are needed to better define the efficacy and safety of DORAs in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8694,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","volume":"84 7","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13472714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1827049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Insomnia is a prevalent disorder associated with impaired daytime functioning and reduced quality of life. Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) have shown favorable short-term efficacy and safety profiles. However, evidence regarding their long-term (≥ 6 months) effects remains limited.

Objective: To synthesize the available evidence on prolonged DORA use in adults with chronic insomnia.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Adults with primary insomnia treated with DORAs (suvorexant, lemborexant, or daridorexant) approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for ≥ 6 months were included. The outcomes included patient-reported sleep parameters, adverse events, and treatment discontinuation.

Results: We included 6 randomized controlled trials comprising 3,546 participants. After 6 and 12 months, DORAs improved subjective sleep parameters of efficacy. Overall, DORAs showed adverse events similar to those of placebo at 6 months, but higher rates at 12 months. The overall rate of discontinuation due to adverse events did not differ significantly, although higher doses of certain DORAs increased the discontinuation rate at 6 months.

Conclusion: In chronic insomnia, DORAs provide sustained improvements in key subjective sleep outcomes, with overall acceptable safety and tolerability profiles. Higher doses may be less well tolerated. Additional long-term randomized trials are needed to better define the efficacy and safety of DORAs in clinical practice.

长期使用双重食欲素受体拮抗剂治疗失眠:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:失眠是一种与白天功能受损和生活质量下降相关的普遍疾病。双食欲素受体拮抗剂(DORAs)已显示出良好的短期疗效和安全性。然而,关于其长期(≥6个月)效果的证据仍然有限。目的:综合现有证据,探讨成人慢性失眠症患者长期使用朵拉的疗效。方法:采用随机对照试验进行系统评价和meta分析。接受美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准治疗≥6个月的dora类药物(suvorexant、lemborexant或daridorexant)治疗的原发性失眠成年人纳入研究。结果包括患者报告的睡眠参数、不良事件和治疗中断。结果:我们纳入了6项随机对照试验,包括3,546名受试者。6个月和12个月后,DORAs改善了主观睡眠参数的有效性。总的来说,DORAs在6个月时显示的不良事件与安慰剂相似,但在12个月时发生率更高。由于不良事件导致的总体停药率没有显著差异,尽管某些多肽类药物的高剂量增加了6个月时的停药率。结论:在慢性失眠症中,dora可持续改善关键的主观睡眠结果,总体上具有可接受的安全性和耐受性。较高剂量的耐受性可能较差。需要更多的长期随机试验来更好地确定dora在临床实践中的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
262
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria is the official journal of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The mission of the journal is to provide neurologists, specialists and researchers in Neurology and related fields with open access to original articles (clinical and translational research), editorials, reviews, historical papers, neuroimages and letters about published manuscripts. It also publishes the consensus and guidelines on Neurology, as well as educational and scientific material from the different scientific departments of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The ultimate goals of the journal are to contribute to advance knowledge in the areas of Neurology and Neuroscience, and to provide valuable material for training and continuing education for neurologists and other health professionals working in the area. These goals might contribute to improving care for patients with neurological diseases. We aim to be the best Neuroscience journal in Latin America within the peer review system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书