Clinical positioning of voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole in the treatment of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: A global real-world database study
{"title":"Clinical positioning of voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole in the treatment of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: A global real-world database study","authors":"Eriko Hashimoto, Sayaka Yoshida, Taito Kitano","doi":"10.1016/j.jgar.2026.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) treated with voriconazole (VRCZ), posaconazole (PSCZ), or isavuconazole (ISCZ) using a large-scale real-world database.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A retrospective study using the TriNetX database (2010–2025) identified patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis initiated on VRCZ, PSCZ, or ISCZ. Background factors were adjusted using propensity score matching (PSM). The primary endpoint was 6-week all-cause mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 8746 patients identified, 3603 met selection criteria (VRCZ: 2836; PSCZ/ISCZ: 767). Propensity score matching identified 738 matched pairs of balanced covariates. The 6-week mortality was 18.6% for VRCZ and 16.4% for PSCZ/ISCZ (OR 1.16; 95% CI 0.89–1.52; <em>P</em> = 0.273). No significant differences were observed in the primary, subgroup, or sensitivity analyses. Notably, the PSCZ/ISCZ group initially included more severe cases and patients with renal impairment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>No significant differences in all-cause mortality were observed among the three drugs. Despite the higher baseline risk in the PSCZ and ISCZ groups, the outcomes were comparable to those in the VRCZ group, suggesting that these agents are effective alternatives in high-risk real-world settings. PSCZ and ISCZ are valuable options in personalized medicine. Therefore, further prospective studies are warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15936,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance","volume":"50 ","pages":"Pages 547-551"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213716526001463","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) treated with voriconazole (VRCZ), posaconazole (PSCZ), or isavuconazole (ISCZ) using a large-scale real-world database.
Materials and methods
A retrospective study using the TriNetX database (2010–2025) identified patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis initiated on VRCZ, PSCZ, or ISCZ. Background factors were adjusted using propensity score matching (PSM). The primary endpoint was 6-week all-cause mortality.
Results
Of 8746 patients identified, 3603 met selection criteria (VRCZ: 2836; PSCZ/ISCZ: 767). Propensity score matching identified 738 matched pairs of balanced covariates. The 6-week mortality was 18.6% for VRCZ and 16.4% for PSCZ/ISCZ (OR 1.16; 95% CI 0.89–1.52; P = 0.273). No significant differences were observed in the primary, subgroup, or sensitivity analyses. Notably, the PSCZ/ISCZ group initially included more severe cases and patients with renal impairment.
Conclusion
No significant differences in all-cause mortality were observed among the three drugs. Despite the higher baseline risk in the PSCZ and ISCZ groups, the outcomes were comparable to those in the VRCZ group, suggesting that these agents are effective alternatives in high-risk real-world settings. PSCZ and ISCZ are valuable options in personalized medicine. Therefore, further prospective studies are warranted.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance (JGAR) is a quarterly online journal run by an international Editorial Board that focuses on the global spread of antibiotic-resistant microbes.
JGAR is a dedicated journal for all professionals working in research, health care, the environment and animal infection control, aiming to track the resistance threat worldwide and provides a single voice devoted to antimicrobial resistance (AMR).
Featuring peer-reviewed and up to date research articles, reviews, short notes and hot topics JGAR covers the key topics related to antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal and antiparasitic resistance.