Clinical positioning of voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole in the treatment of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: A global real-world database study

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Eriko Hashimoto, Sayaka Yoshida, Taito Kitano
{"title":"Clinical positioning of voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole in the treatment of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: A global real-world database study","authors":"Eriko Hashimoto,&nbsp;Sayaka Yoshida,&nbsp;Taito Kitano","doi":"10.1016/j.jgar.2026.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) treated with voriconazole (VRCZ), posaconazole (PSCZ), or isavuconazole (ISCZ) using a large-scale real-world database.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A retrospective study using the TriNetX database (2010–2025) identified patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis initiated on VRCZ, PSCZ, or ISCZ. Background factors were adjusted using propensity score matching (PSM). The primary endpoint was 6-week all-cause mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 8746 patients identified, 3603 met selection criteria (VRCZ: 2836; PSCZ/ISCZ: 767). Propensity score matching identified 738 matched pairs of balanced covariates. The 6-week mortality was 18.6% for VRCZ and 16.4% for PSCZ/ISCZ (OR 1.16; 95% CI 0.89–1.52; <em>P</em> = 0.273). No significant differences were observed in the primary, subgroup, or sensitivity analyses. Notably, the PSCZ/ISCZ group initially included more severe cases and patients with renal impairment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>No significant differences in all-cause mortality were observed among the three drugs. Despite the higher baseline risk in the PSCZ and ISCZ groups, the outcomes were comparable to those in the VRCZ group, suggesting that these agents are effective alternatives in high-risk real-world settings. PSCZ and ISCZ are valuable options in personalized medicine. Therefore, further prospective studies are warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15936,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance","volume":"50 ","pages":"Pages 547-551"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213716526001463","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) treated with voriconazole (VRCZ), posaconazole (PSCZ), or isavuconazole (ISCZ) using a large-scale real-world database.

Materials and methods

A retrospective study using the TriNetX database (2010–2025) identified patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis initiated on VRCZ, PSCZ, or ISCZ. Background factors were adjusted using propensity score matching (PSM). The primary endpoint was 6-week all-cause mortality.

Results

Of 8746 patients identified, 3603 met selection criteria (VRCZ: 2836; PSCZ/ISCZ: 767). Propensity score matching identified 738 matched pairs of balanced covariates. The 6-week mortality was 18.6% for VRCZ and 16.4% for PSCZ/ISCZ (OR 1.16; 95% CI 0.89–1.52; P = 0.273). No significant differences were observed in the primary, subgroup, or sensitivity analyses. Notably, the PSCZ/ISCZ group initially included more severe cases and patients with renal impairment.

Conclusion

No significant differences in all-cause mortality were observed among the three drugs. Despite the higher baseline risk in the PSCZ and ISCZ groups, the outcomes were comparable to those in the VRCZ group, suggesting that these agents are effective alternatives in high-risk real-world settings. PSCZ and ISCZ are valuable options in personalized medicine. Therefore, further prospective studies are warranted.
伏立康唑、泊沙康唑和依沙乌康唑治疗侵袭性肺曲霉病的临床定位:一项全球真实世界数据库研究
简介:本研究利用大规模真实世界数据库,评估了伏立康唑(VRCZ)、泊沙康唑(PSCZ)或isavuconazole (ISCZ)治疗侵袭性肺曲霉病(IPA)的临床结果。材料和方法:一项使用TriNetX数据库(2010-2025)的回顾性研究确定了由VRCZ、PSCZ或ISCZ引发的IPA患者。采用倾向评分匹配法(PSM)调整背景因素。主要终点为6周全因死亡率。结果:在8,746例患者中,3,603例符合选择标准(VRCZ: 2,836; PSCZ/ISCZ: 767)。PSM共鉴定出738对匹配的平衡协变量。VRCZ的6周死亡率为18.6%,PSCZ/ISCZ的6周死亡率为16.4% (OR 1.16; 95% CI 0.89-1.52; p=0.273)。在原发性、亚组或敏感性分析中未观察到显著差异。值得注意的是,PSCZ/ISCZ组最初包括更多的重症病例和肾功能损害患者。结论:三种药物的全因死亡率无显著差异。尽管PSCZ和ISCZ组的基线风险较高,但结果与VRCZ组相当,这表明这些药物在高风险的现实环境中是有效的替代方案。PSCZ和ISCZ是个性化医疗中有价值的选择。因此,进一步的前瞻性研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of global antimicrobial resistance
Journal of global antimicrobial resistance INFECTIOUS DISEASES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
2.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance (JGAR) is a quarterly online journal run by an international Editorial Board that focuses on the global spread of antibiotic-resistant microbes. JGAR is a dedicated journal for all professionals working in research, health care, the environment and animal infection control, aiming to track the resistance threat worldwide and provides a single voice devoted to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Featuring peer-reviewed and up to date research articles, reviews, short notes and hot topics JGAR covers the key topics related to antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal and antiparasitic resistance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书