The Impact of Educational Interventions on Clinical Documentation Using Pretest-Posttest CRABEL Scores: A Single Group Quasi-Experimental Study among Dental Interns.

IF 2.2 Q1 Dentistry
Yosra Ayed, Soha F Alqadi, Amnah A Algarni, Ahmad Othman, Mohamed B BenHamida, Aishah Alhodhodi, Ahmed Nourein, Najla Dar-Odeh
{"title":"The Impact of Educational Interventions on Clinical Documentation Using Pretest-Posttest CRABEL Scores: A Single Group Quasi-Experimental Study among Dental Interns.","authors":"Yosra Ayed, Soha F Alqadi, Amnah A Algarni, Ahmad Othman, Mohamed B BenHamida, Aishah Alhodhodi, Ahmed Nourein, Najla Dar-Odeh","doi":"10.1055/s-0046-1825874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Clinical documentation is essential for patient safety, legal protection, and continuity of care. Nevertheless, record-keeping skills are usually overlooked by most undergraduate dental programs. This study investigated the outcomes of a structured educational intervention by auditing the outpatient case records documentation by dental interns at a public university of Saudi.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental single-group pre-post-test study was conducted among dental interns in the form of a baseline (July-September 2024) and a follow-up (October-December 2024) audit. The educational intervention consisted of a group presentation, one-on-one instruction, and monthly review sessions. Clinical records were assessed using a modified CRABEL scoring system. Completeness of patient data, medical and dental history, examination results, treatment planning, and authentication were evaluated in the documentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 interns participated in the study, with an average of 367.8 clinical records reviewed each month. At the baseline audit (July-September, 2024), at least one essential component was missing from 78% of the records. Incomplete dental exams (46%), unsigned entries (42%), and missing medical histories (54%) were the most common deficiencies. At the re-audit, missing medical histories decreased to 16%, and unsigned entries decreased to 22%. A proportion of 53.4% of records had a baseline Crabel score below 70% (mean score = 56.31 ± 28.2). At the re-audit, the mean score increased to 85.47 ± 16.6. Records with a score ≥80% increased from a proportion of 21.6 to 84.6%, while those with a score <70% dropped to a proportion of 15.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Documentation quality and record-keeping by dental interns can be greatly enhanced by focused educational interventions. Undergraduate dental programs that incorporate frequent audits and targeted training are expected to assist students in developing lifelong habits of accurate and responsible clinical documentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12028,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1825874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Clinical documentation is essential for patient safety, legal protection, and continuity of care. Nevertheless, record-keeping skills are usually overlooked by most undergraduate dental programs. This study investigated the outcomes of a structured educational intervention by auditing the outpatient case records documentation by dental interns at a public university of Saudi.

Materials and methods: A quasi-experimental single-group pre-post-test study was conducted among dental interns in the form of a baseline (July-September 2024) and a follow-up (October-December 2024) audit. The educational intervention consisted of a group presentation, one-on-one instruction, and monthly review sessions. Clinical records were assessed using a modified CRABEL scoring system. Completeness of patient data, medical and dental history, examination results, treatment planning, and authentication were evaluated in the documentation.

Results: A total of 20 interns participated in the study, with an average of 367.8 clinical records reviewed each month. At the baseline audit (July-September, 2024), at least one essential component was missing from 78% of the records. Incomplete dental exams (46%), unsigned entries (42%), and missing medical histories (54%) were the most common deficiencies. At the re-audit, missing medical histories decreased to 16%, and unsigned entries decreased to 22%. A proportion of 53.4% of records had a baseline Crabel score below 70% (mean score = 56.31 ± 28.2). At the re-audit, the mean score increased to 85.47 ± 16.6. Records with a score ≥80% increased from a proportion of 21.6 to 84.6%, while those with a score <70% dropped to a proportion of 15.3%.

Conclusion: Documentation quality and record-keeping by dental interns can be greatly enhanced by focused educational interventions. Undergraduate dental programs that incorporate frequent audits and targeted training are expected to assist students in developing lifelong habits of accurate and responsible clinical documentation.

教育干预对临床文献记录的影响:一项牙科实习生的单组准实验研究。
目的:临床文献对患者安全、法律保护和护理的连续性至关重要。然而,记录保存技能通常被大多数本科牙科课程所忽视。本研究通过审计沙特一所公立大学牙科实习生门诊病例记录文件,调查了结构化教育干预的结果。材料与方法:对牙科实习生进行准实验的单组前-后测试研究,采用基线(2024年7月- 9月)和随访(2024年10月- 12月)审计的形式。教育干预包括小组报告、一对一指导和每月复习会议。临床记录采用改良的CRABEL评分系统进行评估。在文献中评估患者资料、病史和牙科史、检查结果、治疗计划和鉴定的完整性。结果:共有20名实习生参与研究,平均每月查阅病历367.8份。在基线审计(2024年7月至9月)中,78%的记录中至少缺少一个重要组成部分。牙科检查不完整(46%)、未签名(42%)和缺少病史(54%)是最常见的缺陷。在重新审核时,遗漏的病史减少到16%,未签名的记录减少到22%。基线Crabel评分低于70%(平均评分56.31±28.2)的病例占53.4%。复核时平均评分为85.47±16.6分。结论:通过有针对性的教育干预,可以大大提高牙科实习生的文件质量和记录保存水平。本科牙科课程包括频繁的审核和有针对性的培训,旨在帮助学生养成准确和负责任的临床文件的终身习惯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Dentistry
European Journal of Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Dentistry is the official journal of the Dental Investigations Society, based in Turkey. It is a double-blinded peer-reviewed, Open Access, multi-disciplinary international journal addressing various aspects of dentistry. The journal''s board consists of eminent investigators in dentistry from across the globe and presents an ideal international composition. The journal encourages its authors to submit original investigations, reviews, and reports addressing various divisions of dentistry including oral pathology, prosthodontics, endodontics, orthodontics etc. It is available both online and in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书