María Rincón-Gracia, Stefan Börjesson, Robert Söderlund, Hanna Woksepp, Aleksija Neimanis, Henrik Uhlhorn, Thomas Rosendal, David Winlund, Hugo Uddströmer, Josef D. Järhult, Jonas Bonnedahl
{"title":"Using Ongoing Wildlife Surveillance Programs to Monitor Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria in the Environment","authors":"María Rincón-Gracia, Stefan Börjesson, Robert Söderlund, Hanna Woksepp, Aleksija Neimanis, Henrik Uhlhorn, Thomas Rosendal, David Winlund, Hugo Uddströmer, Josef D. Järhult, Jonas Bonnedahl","doi":"10.1111/1758-2229.70404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The need to include wildlife in surveillance programs for antibiotic resistance has been previously highlighted. In the present study, we explored the possibility of sampling Swedish wildlife in conjunction with ongoing monitoring programs for wildlife health and disease to evaluate the occurrence of antibiotic resistance. The animals included in the study represented different trophic levels and degrees of interaction with humans, namely bears, eagles, wolves, foxes, otters, and hares. Samples were screened for ESBL-, pAmpC-, and carbapenemase-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> using selective media, and indicator <i>E. coli</i> was also isolated from each sample. All isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility, and a subset of isolates was genome sequenced. Two samples from foxes were found to carry ESBL- or pAmpC-producing isolates, while no carbapenemase-producing <i>E. coli</i> could be detected. Geographical information on the samples and genetic characterization of the ESBL- and pAmpC-producing isolates suggest that proximity to anthropogenic settings could play a role in the occurrence of antibiotic resistance in wildlife. In addition, the study demonstrated that the use of ongoing wildlife surveillance programs presents a cost-efficient possibility to monitor antibiotic resistance in wild animals. However, future studies and monitoring programs should take careful consideration regarding selection of animal species and distribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":163,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Microbiology Reports","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13477815/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Microbiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-2229.70404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The need to include wildlife in surveillance programs for antibiotic resistance has been previously highlighted. In the present study, we explored the possibility of sampling Swedish wildlife in conjunction with ongoing monitoring programs for wildlife health and disease to evaluate the occurrence of antibiotic resistance. The animals included in the study represented different trophic levels and degrees of interaction with humans, namely bears, eagles, wolves, foxes, otters, and hares. Samples were screened for ESBL-, pAmpC-, and carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli using selective media, and indicator E. coli was also isolated from each sample. All isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility, and a subset of isolates was genome sequenced. Two samples from foxes were found to carry ESBL- or pAmpC-producing isolates, while no carbapenemase-producing E. coli could be detected. Geographical information on the samples and genetic characterization of the ESBL- and pAmpC-producing isolates suggest that proximity to anthropogenic settings could play a role in the occurrence of antibiotic resistance in wildlife. In addition, the study demonstrated that the use of ongoing wildlife surveillance programs presents a cost-efficient possibility to monitor antibiotic resistance in wild animals. However, future studies and monitoring programs should take careful consideration regarding selection of animal species and distribution.
期刊介绍:
The journal is identical in scope to Environmental Microbiology, shares the same editorial team and submission site, and will apply the same high level acceptance criteria. The two journals will be mutually supportive and evolve side-by-side.
Environmental Microbiology Reports provides a high profile vehicle for publication of the most innovative, original and rigorous research in the field. The scope of the Journal encompasses the diversity of current research on microbial processes in the environment, microbial communities, interactions and evolution and includes, but is not limited to, the following:
the structure, activities and communal behaviour of microbial communities
microbial community genetics and evolutionary processes
microbial symbioses, microbial interactions and interactions with plants, animals and abiotic factors
microbes in the tree of life, microbial diversification and evolution
population biology and clonal structure
microbial metabolic and structural diversity
microbial physiology, growth and survival
microbes and surfaces, adhesion and biofouling
responses to environmental signals and stress factors
modelling and theory development
pollution microbiology
extremophiles and life in extreme and unusual little-explored habitats
element cycles and biogeochemical processes, primary and secondary production
microbes in a changing world, microbially-influenced global changes
evolution and diversity of archaeal and bacterial viruses
new technological developments in microbial ecology and evolution, in particular for the study of activities of microbial communities, non-culturable microorganisms and emerging pathogens.