ΔAverage of long and short axis diameter on non-contrast CT is associated with major pathological response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-13 DOI:10.1007/s00330-026-12716-z
Jingyi Liu, Mei Xie, Yunze Liu, Jing Shen, Jie Yao, Xinyu Bao, Xin Zhang, Jianlin Wu, Xinying Xue
{"title":"ΔAverage of long and short axis diameter on non-contrast CT is associated with major pathological response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Jingyi Liu, Mei Xie, Yunze Liu, Jing Shen, Jie Yao, Xinyu Bao, Xin Zhang, Jianlin Wu, Xinying Xue","doi":"10.1007/s00330-026-12716-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer shows heterogeneous efficacy, and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) fails to accurately predict pathological response. The objective was to explore computed tomography parameters associated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy efficacy and compare their performance with RECIST 1.1.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included 48 patients with resectable stage I-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy between September 2018 and July 2023. Computed tomography density parameters (computed tomography value and relative computed tomography value) and morphological characteristics (mean diameter, volume, surface area) were measured before and after treatment. Major pathological response (≤ 10% residual tumor cells) served as the reference standard. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and logistic regression evaluated parameter performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ΔMean diameter demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy for major pathological response (area under the curve 0.83, p < 0.001), with 76% sensitivity, 84% specificity, and 79.2% overall accuracy, with numerically higher accuracy than Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (72.9%), though no formal statistical test for superiority was conducted. In exploratory multivariable analysis, it was the only parameter retaining independent association with major pathological response (odds ratio 11.91, 95% confidence interval 1.52-93.11, p = 0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ΔMean diameter is a promising imaging biomarker for predicting pathological response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy. In this cohort, it showed numerically higher accuracy than RECIST 1.1; however, these findings are hypothesis-generating and require both internal and external validation before clinical implementation.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer shows heterogeneous efficacy, and RECIST 1.1 fails to predict major pathological response, requiring reliable biomarkers. Findings ΔMean diameter was associated with major pathological response (AUC = 0.83), showed numerically higher accuracy than RECIST 1.1, and represented an exploratory independent predictor. Clinical relevance This simple computed tomography parameter shows promise for identifying treatment efficacy in non-complete responders, aids personalized therapy decisions, and improves the accuracy of immunotherapy evaluation without complex radiomics or costly positron emission tomography.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"8236-8248"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12716-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer shows heterogeneous efficacy, and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) fails to accurately predict pathological response. The objective was to explore computed tomography parameters associated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy efficacy and compare their performance with RECIST 1.1.

Materials and methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 48 patients with resectable stage I-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy between September 2018 and July 2023. Computed tomography density parameters (computed tomography value and relative computed tomography value) and morphological characteristics (mean diameter, volume, surface area) were measured before and after treatment. Major pathological response (≤ 10% residual tumor cells) served as the reference standard. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and logistic regression evaluated parameter performance.

Results: ΔMean diameter demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy for major pathological response (area under the curve 0.83, p < 0.001), with 76% sensitivity, 84% specificity, and 79.2% overall accuracy, with numerically higher accuracy than Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (72.9%), though no formal statistical test for superiority was conducted. In exploratory multivariable analysis, it was the only parameter retaining independent association with major pathological response (odds ratio 11.91, 95% confidence interval 1.52-93.11, p = 0.018).

Conclusion: ΔMean diameter is a promising imaging biomarker for predicting pathological response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy. In this cohort, it showed numerically higher accuracy than RECIST 1.1; however, these findings are hypothesis-generating and require both internal and external validation before clinical implementation.

Key points: Question Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer shows heterogeneous efficacy, and RECIST 1.1 fails to predict major pathological response, requiring reliable biomarkers. Findings ΔMean diameter was associated with major pathological response (AUC = 0.83), showed numerically higher accuracy than RECIST 1.1, and represented an exploratory independent predictor. Clinical relevance This simple computed tomography parameter shows promise for identifying treatment efficacy in non-complete responders, aids personalized therapy decisions, and improves the accuracy of immunotherapy evaluation without complex radiomics or costly positron emission tomography.

在可切除的非小细胞肺癌中,非对比CT上长、短轴直径的ΔAverage与新辅助免疫治疗的主要病理反应有关。
目的:新辅助免疫治疗非小细胞肺癌疗效参差不齐,实体瘤反应评价标准(RECIST 1.1)未能准确预测病理反应。目的是探讨与新辅助免疫治疗疗效相关的计算机断层扫描参数,并将其与RECIST 1.1的表现进行比较。材料和方法:本多中心回顾性研究纳入了2018年9月至2023年7月期间接受新辅助免疫治疗的48例可切除I-IIIB期非小细胞肺癌患者。测量治疗前后的计算机断层密度参数(计算机断层值和相对计算机断层值)和形态学特征(平均直径、体积、表面积)。以主要病理反应(残余肿瘤细胞≤10%)为参考标准。接收机工作特性分析和逻辑回归评估参数性能。结果:ΔMean直径对主要病理反应的预测准确率最高(曲线下面积0.83,p)结论:ΔMean直径是预测新辅助免疫治疗病理反应的一种有前景的成像生物标志物。在这个队列中,它在数值上的准确性高于RECIST 1.1;然而,这些发现是假设产生的,在临床实施之前需要内部和外部验证。可切除非小细胞肺癌的新辅助免疫治疗疗效参差不齐,RECIST 1.1无法预测主要病理反应,需要可靠的生物标志物。结果ΔMean直径与主要病理反应相关(AUC = 0.83),数值准确度高于RECIST 1.1,是一种探索性的独立预测因子。这个简单的计算机断层扫描参数显示了在非完全应答者中识别治疗效果的希望,有助于个性化治疗决策,并提高了免疫治疗评估的准确性,而不需要复杂的放射组学或昂贵的正电子发射断层扫描。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书