Assessment of the fetal Evans Index in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Current Medical Research and Opinion Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-14 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2026.2717002
Aziz Kından, Ahmet Kurt, Özgür Volkan Akbulut, Recep Taha Ağaoğlu, Bahadır Codal, Aykut Kından, Belgin Savran Üçok, Çağlayan Ateş, Mustafa Raşit Özler, Erkan Sağlam, Kadriye Yakut Yücel
{"title":"Assessment of the fetal Evans Index in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction.","authors":"Aziz Kından, Ahmet Kurt, Özgür Volkan Akbulut, Recep Taha Ağaoğlu, Bahadır Codal, Aykut Kından, Belgin Savran Üçok, Çağlayan Ateş, Mustafa Raşit Özler, Erkan Sağlam, Kadriye Yakut Yücel","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2026.2717002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fetal growth restriction (FGR) can affect fetal brain development despite adaptive circulatory redistribution. The fetal Evans Index (EI)-the ratio of frontal horn width to inner cranial diameter-may capture proportional cranial remodeling in FGR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective case-control study of singleton pregnancies ≥32 weeks, FGR was defined by Delphi consensus criteria. EI and frontal proportional ratios were obtained on the standardized axial transventricular plane. We evaluated how well EI distinguished FGR cases from controls and whether its association with NICU admission was independent of conventional fetal growth measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort comprised 129 pregnancies (67 FGR, 62 controls). EI was lower in FGR than in controls (0.28 ± 0.02 vs 0.30 ± 0.02; <i>p</i> < 0.001), alongside reduced frontal horn width and a lower FABD/OFD ratio (<i>p</i> < 0.001). EI correlated strongly with frontal horn width (<i>r</i> = 0.752, <i>p</i> < 0.001). EI provided moderate discrimination for FGR (AUC = 0.707, 95% CI 0.617-0.797; cut-off 0.297; sensitivity 78.8%, specificity 51.6%). NICU admission was markedly higher in FGR (44.8% vs 4.8%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). EI ≥ 0.297 was associated with reduced NICU odds in univariate analysis (OR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.07-0.62), but not after adjustment (adjusted OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.11-1.38); abdominal circumference percentile remained independently associated with NICU admission (adjusted OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Late-onset FGR is associated with reduced EI and altered frontal proportional indices, suggesting subtle anterior cerebral remodeling rather than ventriculomegaly. EI may provide complementary neurosonographic information, but its stand-alone diagnostic or prognostic value appears limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"1379-1389"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2026.2717002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) can affect fetal brain development despite adaptive circulatory redistribution. The fetal Evans Index (EI)-the ratio of frontal horn width to inner cranial diameter-may capture proportional cranial remodeling in FGR.

Methods: In a prospective case-control study of singleton pregnancies ≥32 weeks, FGR was defined by Delphi consensus criteria. EI and frontal proportional ratios were obtained on the standardized axial transventricular plane. We evaluated how well EI distinguished FGR cases from controls and whether its association with NICU admission was independent of conventional fetal growth measurements.

Results: The cohort comprised 129 pregnancies (67 FGR, 62 controls). EI was lower in FGR than in controls (0.28 ± 0.02 vs 0.30 ± 0.02; p < 0.001), alongside reduced frontal horn width and a lower FABD/OFD ratio (p < 0.001). EI correlated strongly with frontal horn width (r = 0.752, p < 0.001). EI provided moderate discrimination for FGR (AUC = 0.707, 95% CI 0.617-0.797; cut-off 0.297; sensitivity 78.8%, specificity 51.6%). NICU admission was markedly higher in FGR (44.8% vs 4.8%; p < 0.001). EI ≥ 0.297 was associated with reduced NICU odds in univariate analysis (OR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.07-0.62), but not after adjustment (adjusted OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.11-1.38); abdominal circumference percentile remained independently associated with NICU admission (adjusted OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99).

Conclusions: Late-onset FGR is associated with reduced EI and altered frontal proportional indices, suggesting subtle anterior cerebral remodeling rather than ventriculomegaly. EI may provide complementary neurosonographic information, but its stand-alone diagnostic or prognostic value appears limited.

妊娠合并胎儿生长受限时胎儿埃文斯指数的评估。
背景:胎儿生长限制(FGR)可以影响胎儿大脑发育,尽管有适应性循环再分配。胎儿埃文斯指数(EI)——额角宽度与内颅直径之比——可以反映FGR中比例的颅骨重塑。方法:在一项单胎妊娠≥32周的前瞻性病例对照研究中,FGR采用德尔菲共识标准定义。在标准轴向经室平面上获得EI和额叶比例比。我们评估了EI区分FGR病例与对照组的能力,以及其与NICU入院的关系是否独立于传统的胎儿生长测量。结果:该队列包括129例妊娠(FGR 67例,对照组62例)。FGR组EI低于对照组(0.28±0.02 vs 0.30±0.02);p pr = 0.752, p p结论:迟发性FGR与EI降低和额叶比例指数改变有关,提示轻微的大脑前侧重塑而非脑室扩大。EI可以提供补充的神经超声信息,但其单独诊断或预后价值似乎有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书