Ravens (Corvus corax) use conspecifics and heterospecifics to navigate risky foraging scenarios.

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Behavioral Ecology Pub Date : 2026-07-30 eCollection Date: 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1093/beheco/arag093
Silvia Damini, Arnout Lindeman, Awani Bapat, Petra Sumasgutner, Thomas Bugnyar
{"title":"Ravens (<i>Corvus corax</i>) use conspecifics and heterospecifics to navigate risky foraging scenarios.","authors":"Silvia Damini, Arnout Lindeman, Awani Bapat, Petra Sumasgutner, Thomas Bugnyar","doi":"10.1093/beheco/arag093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Foraging animals need to balance the trade-off between the benefits of exploiting new resources and the unknown risks they entail. Changing environments are especially challenging, as this balance between risk and reward needs to be constantly reevaluated. One strategy animals, and in particular scavengers employ, is using conspecifics and heterospecifics as sources of information to access food. In this study, we focused on free-ranging ravens that habitually forage in a wildlife park together with heterospecifics (boars) and tested their responses to unfamiliar and unpredictable foraging situations. In the 2-sites experiment (E1), we presented them with a choice between an unfamiliar (new) and a familiar (old) foraging site; in the object experiment (E2), we presented them with an object, otherwise not seen in the wildlife park, positioned randomly next to 1 of the sites. In both experiments, we found that ravens delayed their initial approach until the boars reached the food. In E1, ravens took longer to approach the food; stole more food from conspecifics but visited in larger numbers at the new site compared with the old. In conclusion: they flexibly used others, including heterospecifics, as sources of knowledge and means to access food. In E2, the object had a stronger aversive effect at the old site than at the new site, suggesting that the effect of unpredictability is stronger in familiar environments, where it might cause an expectancy violation. Our findings highlight that the behavior toward conspecifics and heterospecifics should be considered when studying scavengers' adaptability to changing environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":8840,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology","volume":"37 5","pages":"arag093"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13475124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arag093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Foraging animals need to balance the trade-off between the benefits of exploiting new resources and the unknown risks they entail. Changing environments are especially challenging, as this balance between risk and reward needs to be constantly reevaluated. One strategy animals, and in particular scavengers employ, is using conspecifics and heterospecifics as sources of information to access food. In this study, we focused on free-ranging ravens that habitually forage in a wildlife park together with heterospecifics (boars) and tested their responses to unfamiliar and unpredictable foraging situations. In the 2-sites experiment (E1), we presented them with a choice between an unfamiliar (new) and a familiar (old) foraging site; in the object experiment (E2), we presented them with an object, otherwise not seen in the wildlife park, positioned randomly next to 1 of the sites. In both experiments, we found that ravens delayed their initial approach until the boars reached the food. In E1, ravens took longer to approach the food; stole more food from conspecifics but visited in larger numbers at the new site compared with the old. In conclusion: they flexibly used others, including heterospecifics, as sources of knowledge and means to access food. In E2, the object had a stronger aversive effect at the old site than at the new site, suggesting that the effect of unpredictability is stronger in familiar environments, where it might cause an expectancy violation. Our findings highlight that the behavior toward conspecifics and heterospecifics should be considered when studying scavengers' adaptability to changing environments.

乌鸦(Corvus corax)使用同种和异种来导航危险的觅食场景。
觅食动物需要在开发新资源的好处和由此带来的未知风险之间取得平衡。不断变化的环境尤其具有挑战性,因为需要不断重新评估风险和回报之间的平衡。动物,尤其是食腐动物采用的一种策略是利用同种和异种作为获取食物的信息来源。在本研究中,我们以自由放养的渡鸦为研究对象,测试了它们对不熟悉和不可预测的觅食环境的反应。在2点实验(E1)中,我们让它们在不熟悉(新)的觅食地点和熟悉(旧)的觅食地点之间进行选择;在物体实验(E2)中,我们向他们展示了一个在野生动物园中看不到的物体,随机放置在其中一个地点旁边。在这两个实验中,我们发现渡鸦推迟了它们最初的接近,直到公猪到达食物。在E1中,渡鸦需要更长的时间来接近食物;从同种动物那里偷了更多的食物,但与旧的相比,在新地点访问的数量更多。总而言之:他们灵活地利用他人,包括异种人,作为知识来源和获取食物的手段。在E2中,对象在旧位点比在新位点有更强的厌恶效应,这表明不可预测性的影响在熟悉的环境中更强,在那里它可能导致期望违反。我们的研究结果强调,在研究食腐动物对变化环境的适应性时,应该考虑对同种和异种的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Ecology
Behavioral Ecology 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Studies on the whole range of behaving organisms, including plants, invertebrates, vertebrates, and humans, are included. Behavioral Ecology construes the field in its broadest sense to include 1) the use of ecological and evolutionary processes to explain the occurrence and adaptive significance of behavior patterns; 2) the use of behavioral processes to predict ecological patterns, and 3) empirical, comparative analyses relating behavior to the environment in which it occurs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书