Evaluating the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale Parent and Teacher Reports (6 to 18 years) to Predict an Autism Diagnosis in a Clinical Sample.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Reese Costenbader, Megan Norris, Courtney E Rice, Kelsey B Shively, Kevin G Stephenson
{"title":"Evaluating the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale Parent and Teacher Reports (6 to 18 years) to Predict an Autism Diagnosis in a Clinical Sample.","authors":"Reese Costenbader, Megan Norris, Courtney E Rice, Kelsey B Shively, Kevin G Stephenson","doi":"10.1007/s10578-026-02069-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rating scales are widely used in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) evaluations to provide information about developmental history and behavior across settings. Despite frequent use, limited research has examined the diagnostic utility of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale (ASRS) in clinical settings. This study evaluated the ability of the ASRS to predict ASD diagnoses in a clinical sample. We conducted a chart review of 2,200 youth ages 8-18 years (M = 10, SD = 3) who completed comprehensive autism evaluations and either received an ASD diagnosis (n = 1101) or did not (n = 1119). We analyzed parent and teacher ASRS forms using t-tests and receiver operating characteristic analyses. The DSM subscale scores were significantly higher in the ASD group, though effect sizes were small. Teacher ratings performed slightly better than parent ratings, but overall diagnostic accuracy was poor (AUC = 0.62). Findings suggest the ASRS may aid screening but has limited diagnostic utility in high base-rate clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10024,"journal":{"name":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-026-02069-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rating scales are widely used in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) evaluations to provide information about developmental history and behavior across settings. Despite frequent use, limited research has examined the diagnostic utility of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale (ASRS) in clinical settings. This study evaluated the ability of the ASRS to predict ASD diagnoses in a clinical sample. We conducted a chart review of 2,200 youth ages 8-18 years (M = 10, SD = 3) who completed comprehensive autism evaluations and either received an ASD diagnosis (n = 1101) or did not (n = 1119). We analyzed parent and teacher ASRS forms using t-tests and receiver operating characteristic analyses. The DSM subscale scores were significantly higher in the ASD group, though effect sizes were small. Teacher ratings performed slightly better than parent ratings, but overall diagnostic accuracy was poor (AUC = 0.62). Findings suggest the ASRS may aid screening but has limited diagnostic utility in high base-rate clinical settings.

评估自闭症谱系评定量表家长和老师报告(6至18岁)预测自闭症诊断的临床样本。
评定量表被广泛应用于自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的评估中,以提供不同环境下的发育历史和行为信息。尽管频繁使用,有限的研究已经检查了自闭症谱系评定量表(ASRS)在临床环境中的诊断效用。本研究评估了ASRS在临床样本中预测ASD诊断的能力。我们对2200名8-18岁的青少年(M = 10, SD = 3)进行了图表回顾,他们完成了全面的自闭症评估,要么接受了ASD诊断(n = 1101),要么没有接受ASD诊断(n = 1119)。我们使用t检验和接受者操作特征分析来分析家长和教师的ASRS表格。ASD组的DSM子量表得分明显更高,尽管效应量很小。教师评分略好于家长评分,但总体诊断准确性较差(AUC = 0.62)。研究结果表明,ASRS可能有助于筛查,但在高基础率的临床环境中诊断效用有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Child Psychiatry & Human Development is an interdisciplinary international journal serving the groups represented by child and adolescent psychiatry, clinical child/pediatric/family psychology, pediatrics, social science, and human development. The journal publishes research on diagnosis, assessment, treatment, epidemiology, development, advocacy, training, cultural factors, ethics, policy, and professional issues as related to clinical disorders in children, adolescents, and families. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original empirical research in addition to substantive and theoretical reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书