Willis and Sydenham: intersections and contrasts in early modern England.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-13 DOI:10.1055/s-0046-1827164
João Pedro Sá Lins, Rodrigo da Silva Sousa, Lucca Passow Carpinelli, Gustavo Leite Franklin, Hélio Afonso Ghizoni Teive, Alex Tiburtino Meira
{"title":"Willis and Sydenham: intersections and contrasts in early modern England.","authors":"João Pedro Sá Lins, Rodrigo da Silva Sousa, Lucca Passow Carpinelli, Gustavo Leite Franklin, Hélio Afonso Ghizoni Teive, Alex Tiburtino Meira","doi":"10.1055/s-0046-1827164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Thomas Willis and Thomas Sydenham exemplify contrasting modes of medical validation in Early Modern England shaped by political and institutional realignments after the English Civil War and the Stuart Restoration. Benefiting from his ties to the Crown and the Church of England, Willis combined anatomical investigation of the nervous system with iatrochemical and theological frameworks. In contrast, Sydenham, aligned with the Parliamentary cause and operating outside academic institutions, developed a clinical method grounded in systematic bedside observation and nosological description during London epidemics. Their trajectories reveal divergent medical epistemology that coalesced to influence the foundations of neurological reasoning and the modern clinical method.</p>","PeriodicalId":8694,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","volume":"84 9","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13472720/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1827164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Thomas Willis and Thomas Sydenham exemplify contrasting modes of medical validation in Early Modern England shaped by political and institutional realignments after the English Civil War and the Stuart Restoration. Benefiting from his ties to the Crown and the Church of England, Willis combined anatomical investigation of the nervous system with iatrochemical and theological frameworks. In contrast, Sydenham, aligned with the Parliamentary cause and operating outside academic institutions, developed a clinical method grounded in systematic bedside observation and nosological description during London epidemics. Their trajectories reveal divergent medical epistemology that coalesced to influence the foundations of neurological reasoning and the modern clinical method.

威利斯与西德纳姆:近代早期英格兰的交叉与对比。
摘要:托马斯·威利斯(Thomas Willis)和托马斯·西德纳姆(Thomas Sydenham)是英国内战和斯图亚特王朝复辟后政治和制度重组所形成的近代早期英格兰医学验证模式的典型代表。得益于他与王室和英国教会的关系,威利斯将神经系统的解剖学研究与医学化学和神学框架结合起来。相比之下,西德纳姆与议会事业结盟,在学术机构之外运作,在伦敦流行病期间开发了一种基于系统床边观察和分类学描述的临床方法。他们的轨迹揭示了不同的医学认识论,这些认识论联合起来影响了神经推理和现代临床方法的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
262
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria is the official journal of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The mission of the journal is to provide neurologists, specialists and researchers in Neurology and related fields with open access to original articles (clinical and translational research), editorials, reviews, historical papers, neuroimages and letters about published manuscripts. It also publishes the consensus and guidelines on Neurology, as well as educational and scientific material from the different scientific departments of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The ultimate goals of the journal are to contribute to advance knowledge in the areas of Neurology and Neuroscience, and to provide valuable material for training and continuing education for neurologists and other health professionals working in the area. These goals might contribute to improving care for patients with neurological diseases. We aim to be the best Neuroscience journal in Latin America within the peer review system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书