Bioactive nanomedicines for multidrug-resistant colorectal cancer: Actionable mechanisms, emerging particle classes, and translational barriers.

IF 21 1区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Milad Rasouli, Fatemeh Babaei, Nadia Fallahhossein, Adeleh Divsalar
{"title":"Bioactive nanomedicines for multidrug-resistant colorectal cancer: Actionable mechanisms, emerging particle classes, and translational barriers.","authors":"Milad Rasouli, Fatemeh Babaei, Nadia Fallahhossein, Adeleh Divsalar","doi":"10.1016/j.addr.2026.115957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multidrug resistance (MDR) in colorectal cancer (CRC) arises from interacting tumour-cell, pharmacological and microenvironmental programmes that undermine both drug activity and delivery. Chemotherapy-associated MDR is the principal focus of this review, while resistance to targeted therapy and immunotherapy is considered where it directly affects delivery design or patient selection. Bioactive compounds can modulate several resistance pathways, but their translational value is constrained by poor solubility, instability, rapid metabolism and inadequate exposure at resistant lesions. This review critically examines when nanomedicine can make such mechanistic activity pharmacologically and translationally meaningful. We link resistance biology to delivery functions, evaluate bioactive chemosensitiser candidates against human exposure, compare major nanomedicine design strategies, and assess nano-bio interactions, repeat-dose safety, manufacturing and clinical positioning. Across the evidence, three limitations recur. First, concentrations associated with chemosensitisation for curcumin, resveratrol, epigallocatechin gallate and quercetin generally exceed measured human parent-analyte exposure. Second, many resistance claims rely on parental or poorly characterised models, whereas studies combining defined resistance provenance with functional mechanism and exposure confirmation remain uncommon. Third, human studies demonstrate feasibility, tissue exposure or treatment response, but not mechanism-specific reversal of CRC MDR by a bioactive compound or bioactive nanomedicine. Progress therefore depends less on adding new particle classes than on matching a necessary formulation function to a defined resistance or spatial barrier, quantifying active exposure in the relevant compartment, validating mechanism in appropriate models, and integrating repeat-dose safety, scalable manufacturing and biomarker-guided clinical development.</p>","PeriodicalId":7254,"journal":{"name":"Advanced drug delivery reviews","volume":" ","pages":"115957"},"PeriodicalIF":21.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced drug delivery reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2026.115957","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multidrug resistance (MDR) in colorectal cancer (CRC) arises from interacting tumour-cell, pharmacological and microenvironmental programmes that undermine both drug activity and delivery. Chemotherapy-associated MDR is the principal focus of this review, while resistance to targeted therapy and immunotherapy is considered where it directly affects delivery design or patient selection. Bioactive compounds can modulate several resistance pathways, but their translational value is constrained by poor solubility, instability, rapid metabolism and inadequate exposure at resistant lesions. This review critically examines when nanomedicine can make such mechanistic activity pharmacologically and translationally meaningful. We link resistance biology to delivery functions, evaluate bioactive chemosensitiser candidates against human exposure, compare major nanomedicine design strategies, and assess nano-bio interactions, repeat-dose safety, manufacturing and clinical positioning. Across the evidence, three limitations recur. First, concentrations associated with chemosensitisation for curcumin, resveratrol, epigallocatechin gallate and quercetin generally exceed measured human parent-analyte exposure. Second, many resistance claims rely on parental or poorly characterised models, whereas studies combining defined resistance provenance with functional mechanism and exposure confirmation remain uncommon. Third, human studies demonstrate feasibility, tissue exposure or treatment response, but not mechanism-specific reversal of CRC MDR by a bioactive compound or bioactive nanomedicine. Progress therefore depends less on adding new particle classes than on matching a necessary formulation function to a defined resistance or spatial barrier, quantifying active exposure in the relevant compartment, validating mechanism in appropriate models, and integrating repeat-dose safety, scalable manufacturing and biomarker-guided clinical development.

多药耐药结直肠癌的生物活性纳米药物:可操作的机制,新出现的颗粒类别和翻译障碍。
结直肠癌(CRC)的多药耐药(MDR)源于肿瘤细胞、药理学和微环境程序的相互作用,这些程序破坏了药物活性和递送。化疗相关的耐多药是本综述的主要焦点,而对靶向治疗和免疫治疗的耐药性则被认为是直接影响递送设计或患者选择的原因。生物活性化合物可以调节几种耐药途径,但其翻译价值受到溶解度差、不稳定性、快速代谢和在耐药病变中暴露不足的限制。这篇综述批判性地探讨了纳米医学何时可以使这种机制活性具有药理学和翻译意义。我们将抗性生物学与递送功能联系起来,评估生物活性化学致敏剂候选物对人体暴露的影响,比较主要的纳米药物设计策略,并评估纳米生物相互作用,重复剂量安全性,制造和临床定位。在所有证据中,有三个局限性反复出现。首先,姜黄素、白藜芦醇、没食子儿茶素没食子酸酯和槲皮素的化学致敏相关浓度通常超过测定的人类亲本分析物暴露量。其次,许多耐药性声明依赖于亲本或特征不明确的模型,而将确定的抗性来源与功能机制和暴露确认相结合的研究仍然不常见。第三,人体研究证明了可行性、组织暴露或治疗反应,但没有证明生物活性化合物或生物活性纳米药物对结直肠癌耐多药的机制特异性逆转。因此,进展更多地取决于将必要的配方功能与定义的抗性或空间屏障相匹配,量化相关隔室中的主动暴露,在适当的模型中验证机制,以及整合重复剂量安全性,可扩展的制造和生物标志物指导的临床开发,而不是增加新的颗粒类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
28.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal is to provide a forum for the critical analysis of advanced drug and gene delivery systems and their applications in human and veterinary medicine. The Journal has a broad scope, covering the key issues for effective drug and gene delivery, from administration to site-specific delivery. In general, the Journal publishes review articles in a Theme Issue format. Each Theme Issue provides a comprehensive and critical examination of current and emerging research on the design and development of advanced drug and gene delivery systems and their application to experimental and clinical therapeutics. The goal is to illustrate the pivotal role of a multidisciplinary approach to modern drug delivery, encompassing the application of sound biological and physicochemical principles to the engineering of drug delivery systems to meet the therapeutic need at hand. Importantly the Editorial Team of ADDR asks that the authors effectively window the extensive volume of literature, pick the important contributions and explain their importance, produce a forward looking identification of the challenges facing the field and produce a Conclusions section with expert recommendations to address the issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书