Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Denosumab on Tumor Recurrence, Ossification, and Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Grade III Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: A Prospective, Non-Randomized Comparative Interventional Study
Mehdi Karimi, Samira Pirzad, Kimia Habibi, Masoud Mirkazemi
{"title":"Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Denosumab on Tumor Recurrence, Ossification, and Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Grade III Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: A Prospective, Non-Randomized Comparative Interventional Study","authors":"Mehdi Karimi, Samira Pirzad, Kimia Habibi, Masoud Mirkazemi","doi":"10.1111/ajco.70153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rare, locally aggressive osteolytic neoplasm associated with a substantial risk of local recurrence and challenging surgical management. Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody, has emerged as a promising therapeutic option. This study evaluates the efficacy of denosumab as a neoadjuvant therapy in patients with Grade III GCTB, with particular emphasis on tumor recurrence, ossification, and surgical outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this prospective, non-randomized comparative interventional study, 34 adults with histologically confirmed Campanacci Grade III GCTB were enrolled and prospectively followed. Sixteen patients received neoadjuvant denosumab and 18 contemporaneous patients underwent surgery without neoadjuvant denosumab. Treatment allocation was based on routine clinical decision-making and patient-specific factors rather than randomization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>During the 18-month follow-up period, local recurrence occurred in 2 of 16 patients (12.5%) in the denosumab intervention group and in 8 of 18 patients (44.4%) in the comparison group (<i>p = </i>0.063). Radiological ossification was observed in all patients in the denosumab group and in none of the patients in the comparison group. Curettage and cementation were performed in 14 patients (87.5%) in the intervention group and 12 patients (66.7%) in the comparison group; this difference was not statistically significant (<i>p = </i>0.233). Qualitative histopathological assessment of available specimens from denosumab-treated patients demonstrated marked depletion or disappearance of osteoclast-like giant cells, accompanied by treatment-related changes including new bone formation, fibrosis, and hemorrhage.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, neoadjuvant denosumab was associated with complete radiological ossification, qualitative histopathological changes characterized by marked depletion of osteoclast-like giant cells, and numerically lower observed local recurrence and greater use of curettage and cementation, although the latter two between-group differences were not statistically significant.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":"22 6","pages":"853-860"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajco.70153","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rare, locally aggressive osteolytic neoplasm associated with a substantial risk of local recurrence and challenging surgical management. Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody, has emerged as a promising therapeutic option. This study evaluates the efficacy of denosumab as a neoadjuvant therapy in patients with Grade III GCTB, with particular emphasis on tumor recurrence, ossification, and surgical outcomes.
Methods
In this prospective, non-randomized comparative interventional study, 34 adults with histologically confirmed Campanacci Grade III GCTB were enrolled and prospectively followed. Sixteen patients received neoadjuvant denosumab and 18 contemporaneous patients underwent surgery without neoadjuvant denosumab. Treatment allocation was based on routine clinical decision-making and patient-specific factors rather than randomization.
Results
During the 18-month follow-up period, local recurrence occurred in 2 of 16 patients (12.5%) in the denosumab intervention group and in 8 of 18 patients (44.4%) in the comparison group (p = 0.063). Radiological ossification was observed in all patients in the denosumab group and in none of the patients in the comparison group. Curettage and cementation were performed in 14 patients (87.5%) in the intervention group and 12 patients (66.7%) in the comparison group; this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.233). Qualitative histopathological assessment of available specimens from denosumab-treated patients demonstrated marked depletion or disappearance of osteoclast-like giant cells, accompanied by treatment-related changes including new bone formation, fibrosis, and hemorrhage.
Conclusion
In this study, neoadjuvant denosumab was associated with complete radiological ossification, qualitative histopathological changes characterized by marked depletion of osteoclast-like giant cells, and numerically lower observed local recurrence and greater use of curettage and cementation, although the latter two between-group differences were not statistically significant.
期刊介绍:
Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.