Noncoding RNAs as novel diagnostic biomarkers for diabetic retinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学
Ting Zhang, Donghong Xu
{"title":"Noncoding RNAs as novel diagnostic biomarkers for diabetic retinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ting Zhang, Donghong Xu","doi":"10.1111/jdi.70395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Diabetic retinopathy (DR), a frequent microvascular complication of diabetes, requires early detection to mitigate progression. Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) have emerged as promising diagnostic biomarkers. This meta-analysis evaluates their overall diagnostic accuracy for DR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, to identify relevant studies published until August 2025. Data on study characteristics, quality, and diagnostic performance were pooled. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was explored via subgroup analysis and meta-regression; publication bias was assessed using Deck's funnel plot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four studies from 17 articles (1,983 patients, 1,437 controls) were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated that ncRNAs achieved a sensitivity of 0.81 and a specificity of 0.84. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.89, whereas the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 4.96 and 0.23, respectively. LncRNAs demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to miRNAs (P = 0.03). Control type, region, and expression trend did not significantly influence outcomes. Significant heterogeneity was observed (I<sup>2</sup> > 50%), but sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness, and no notable publication bias was detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Circulating ncRNAs, particularly lncRNAs, show high diagnostic potential for DR and represent promising noninvasive biomarkers for early screening and differential diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13480023/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.70395","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Diabetic retinopathy (DR), a frequent microvascular complication of diabetes, requires early detection to mitigate progression. Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) have emerged as promising diagnostic biomarkers. This meta-analysis evaluates their overall diagnostic accuracy for DR.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, to identify relevant studies published until August 2025. Data on study characteristics, quality, and diagnostic performance were pooled. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was explored via subgroup analysis and meta-regression; publication bias was assessed using Deck's funnel plot.

Results: Twenty-four studies from 17 articles (1,983 patients, 1,437 controls) were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated that ncRNAs achieved a sensitivity of 0.81 and a specificity of 0.84. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.89, whereas the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 4.96 and 0.23, respectively. LncRNAs demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to miRNAs (P = 0.03). Control type, region, and expression trend did not significantly influence outcomes. Significant heterogeneity was observed (I2 > 50%), but sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness, and no notable publication bias was detected.

Conclusion: Circulating ncRNAs, particularly lncRNAs, show high diagnostic potential for DR and represent promising noninvasive biomarkers for early screening and differential diagnosis.

非编码rna作为糖尿病视网膜病变的新诊断生物标志物:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景和目的:糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是糖尿病的一种常见的微血管并发症,需要早期发现以减缓进展。非编码rna (ncRNAs)已成为有前景的诊断生物标志物。方法:对PubMed、Embase和Web of Science等多个电子数据库进行了全面的文献检索,以确定2025年8月之前发表的相关研究。对研究特征、质量和诊断表现的数据进行汇总。采用随机效应模型计算合并效应量。通过亚组分析和meta回归探讨异质性;采用Deck漏斗图评估发表偏倚。结果:纳入了来自17篇文章的24项研究(1983例患者,1437例对照)。合并分析表明,ncrna的敏感性为0.81,特异性为0.84。曲线下面积(AUC)为0.89,正、负似然比分别为4.96和0.23。LncRNAs的诊断性能优于miRNAs (P = 0.03)。对照类型、区域和表达趋势对结果无显著影响。观察到显著的异质性(I2 bb0 50%),但敏感性分析证实了稳健性,未发现明显的发表偏倚。结论:循环ncRNAs,特别是lncRNAs,在DR诊断中具有很高的潜力,是早期筛查和鉴别诊断的无创生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Journal of Diabetes Investigation Medicine-Internal Medicine
自引率
9.40%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes Investigation is your core diabetes journal from Asia; the official journal of the Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD). The journal publishes original research, country reports, commentaries, reviews, mini-reviews, case reports, letters, as well as editorials and news. Embracing clinical and experimental research in diabetes and related areas, the Journal of Diabetes Investigation includes aspects of prevention, treatment, as well as molecular aspects and pathophysiology. Translational research focused on the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers is also welcome. Journal of Diabetes Investigation is indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书