Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence in Public Health: Mitigating Risks and Advancing Health Equity.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
American journal of public health Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-13 DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2026.308638
Terry Adirim, Amy Molten
{"title":"Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence in Public Health: Mitigating Risks and Advancing Health Equity.","authors":"Terry Adirim, Amy Molten","doi":"10.2105/AJPH.2026.308638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into public health practice, offering new tools for surveillance, behavioral interventions, disease prevention, risk communication, and population health management. Although AI demonstrates promise for earlier disease detection, improved intervention targeting, and cost-effective augmentation of limited public health capacity, many tools are being deployed amid fragmented regulatory frameworks, validation standards, and equity safeguards that govern other health interventions. Consequently, AI can introduce significant ethical, operational, and equity-related risks. Current industry-driven AI development lacks sufficient guardrails for the ethical and responsible use of AI across public health systems, creating risks that disproportionately affect underserved populations. We examine current AI applications in public health through the lens of established ethical principles, with particular attention to historically marginalized communities. In our analyses, we identify critical infrastructure and governance gaps across federal, state, local, and Tribal settings, and propose concrete strategies, including mandatory equity impact assessments, validation in the communities of intended use, alignment with data sovereignty principles, transparency with communities about when and how AI is used, and sustained investment in public health workforce capacity to evaluate AI tools. (<i>Am J Public Health</i>. 2026;116(10):1520-1528. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2026.308638).</p>","PeriodicalId":7647,"journal":{"name":"American journal of public health","volume":" ","pages":"1520-1528"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2026.308638","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into public health practice, offering new tools for surveillance, behavioral interventions, disease prevention, risk communication, and population health management. Although AI demonstrates promise for earlier disease detection, improved intervention targeting, and cost-effective augmentation of limited public health capacity, many tools are being deployed amid fragmented regulatory frameworks, validation standards, and equity safeguards that govern other health interventions. Consequently, AI can introduce significant ethical, operational, and equity-related risks. Current industry-driven AI development lacks sufficient guardrails for the ethical and responsible use of AI across public health systems, creating risks that disproportionately affect underserved populations. We examine current AI applications in public health through the lens of established ethical principles, with particular attention to historically marginalized communities. In our analyses, we identify critical infrastructure and governance gaps across federal, state, local, and Tribal settings, and propose concrete strategies, including mandatory equity impact assessments, validation in the communities of intended use, alignment with data sovereignty principles, transparency with communities about when and how AI is used, and sustained investment in public health workforce capacity to evaluate AI tools. (Am J Public Health. 2026;116(10):1520-1528. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2026.308638).

人工智能在公共卫生中的伦理应用:降低风险和促进卫生公平。
人工智能(AI)越来越多地融入公共卫生实践,为监测、行为干预、疾病预防、风险沟通和人口健康管理提供了新的工具。尽管人工智能有望更早地发现疾病,改进干预措施的目标,并具有成本效益地增强有限的公共卫生能力,但在管理其他卫生干预措施的分散监管框架、验证标准和公平保障措施中,正在部署许多工具。因此,人工智能可能会带来重大的道德、运营和股权相关风险。目前由行业驱动的人工智能发展缺乏足够的保障,无法在公共卫生系统中以道德和负责任的方式使用人工智能,从而造成风险,对服务不足的人群造成不成比例的影响。我们通过既定的伦理原则审视当前人工智能在公共卫生中的应用,特别关注历史上被边缘化的社区。在我们的分析中,我们确定了联邦、州、地方和部落环境中的关键基础设施和治理差距,并提出了具体战略,包括强制性公平影响评估、在预期使用社区进行验证、与数据主权原则保持一致、在何时以及如何使用人工智能方面与社区保持透明度,以及对公共卫生人力能力进行持续投资,以评估人工智能工具。公共卫生。2026年8月13日在线出版:e1-e9。https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2026.308638)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of public health
American journal of public health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1109
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Public Health (AJPH) is dedicated to publishing original work in research, research methods, and program evaluation within the field of public health. The journal's mission is to advance public health research, policy, practice, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书