Atherogenic and inflammatory biomarkers in NSTEMI: a comparative analysis of predictive value for obstructive coronary disease.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Veysi Can, Fuat Polat, Ahmet Ferhat Kaya, Ömer Kümet, Görkem Ayhan, Emrah Özbek
{"title":"Atherogenic and inflammatory biomarkers in NSTEMI: a comparative analysis of predictive value for obstructive coronary disease.","authors":"Veysi Can, Fuat Polat, Ahmet Ferhat Kaya, Ömer Kümet, Görkem Ayhan, Emrah Özbek","doi":"10.1080/17843286.2026.2719660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) and inflammatory indices may reflect the burden of atherosclerosis. This study evaluated their predictive value for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 624 NSTEMI patients undergoing coronary angiography. Patients were classified as having obstructive or non-obstructive CAD. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic characteristics were compared. Independent predictors were identified using multivariable logistic regression, and discriminative performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>          The obstructive CAD group was significantly older (64.3 ± 12.3 vs. 57.4 ± 14.2 years; p < 0.001) with higher prevalence of males (63.3% vs. 50.8%; p = 0.003), hypertension (52.1% vs. 30.2%; p < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (47.6% vs. 28.9%; p < 0.001). Inflammatory markers were markedly elevated: NLR [4.2 vs. 1.9; p < 0.001], PLR [140.9 vs. 119.1; p < 0.001], SII [1113.3 vs. 520.1; p < 0.001], and CRP [0.4 vs. 0.2 mg/dL; p < 0.001]. AIP was significantly higher [0.71 vs. 0.46; p < 0.001]. ROC analysis demonstrated that NLR (AUC = 0.764) and SII (AUC = 0.738) had the highest discriminative ability, while AIP showed limited performance (AUC = 0.563). In multivariable analysis, independent predictors included age (OR = 1.031), hypertension (OR = 1.645), diabetes (OR = 1.547), PLR (OR = 1.004), CRP (OR = 1.156), and AIP (OR = 2.413; all p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AIP was independently associated with obstructive CAD beyond traditional risk factors and inflammatory indices, despite modest standalone discriminative ability. These findings are hypothesis-generating and require prospective validation with clinical outcomes before routine clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7086,"journal":{"name":"Acta Clinica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Clinica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2026.2719660","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) and inflammatory indices may reflect the burden of atherosclerosis. This study evaluated their predictive value for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

Methods: This retrospective study included 624 NSTEMI patients undergoing coronary angiography. Patients were classified as having obstructive or non-obstructive CAD. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic characteristics were compared. Independent predictors were identified using multivariable logistic regression, and discriminative performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Results:           The obstructive CAD group was significantly older (64.3 ± 12.3 vs. 57.4 ± 14.2 years; p < 0.001) with higher prevalence of males (63.3% vs. 50.8%; p = 0.003), hypertension (52.1% vs. 30.2%; p < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (47.6% vs. 28.9%; p < 0.001). Inflammatory markers were markedly elevated: NLR [4.2 vs. 1.9; p < 0.001], PLR [140.9 vs. 119.1; p < 0.001], SII [1113.3 vs. 520.1; p < 0.001], and CRP [0.4 vs. 0.2 mg/dL; p < 0.001]. AIP was significantly higher [0.71 vs. 0.46; p < 0.001]. ROC analysis demonstrated that NLR (AUC = 0.764) and SII (AUC = 0.738) had the highest discriminative ability, while AIP showed limited performance (AUC = 0.563). In multivariable analysis, independent predictors included age (OR = 1.031), hypertension (OR = 1.645), diabetes (OR = 1.547), PLR (OR = 1.004), CRP (OR = 1.156), and AIP (OR = 2.413; all p < 0.05).

Conclusion: AIP was independently associated with obstructive CAD beyond traditional risk factors and inflammatory indices, despite modest standalone discriminative ability. These findings are hypothesis-generating and require prospective validation with clinical outcomes before routine clinical implementation.

NSTEMI中动脉粥样硬化和炎症生物标志物:对阻塞性冠状动脉疾病预测价值的比较分析
背景:血浆动脉粥样硬化指数(AIP)和炎症指数可能反映动脉粥样硬化的负担。本研究评估了它们对非st段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的预测价值。方法:本回顾性研究纳入624例接受冠状动脉造影的非stemi患者。患者分为阻塞性和非阻塞性冠心病。比较人口学、临床、实验室和超声心动图特征。采用多变量logistic回归确定独立预测因子,并通过受试者工作特征分析评估判别效果。结果:梗阻性CAD组明显老年化(64.3±12.3岁vs. 57.4±14.2岁);p结论:AIP与梗阻性CAD的独立相关性超出了传统的危险因素和炎症指标,尽管独立判别能力不强。这些发现是假设产生的,需要在常规临床实施之前对临床结果进行前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Clinica Belgica
Acta Clinica Belgica 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Clinica Belgica: International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine primarily publishes papers on clinical medicine, clinical chemistry, pathology and molecular biology, provided they describe results which contribute to our understanding of clinical problems or describe new methods applicable to clinical investigation. Readership includes physicians, pathologists, pharmacists and physicians working in non-academic and academic hospitals, practicing internal medicine and its subspecialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书