Contrasting temporal drivers of methane flux across land uses in freshwater wetlands

IF 3.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 LIMNOLOGY
Graham A. Stewart, Michael R. Williams, Gregory W. McCarty, Margaret A. Palmer
{"title":"Contrasting temporal drivers of methane flux across land uses in freshwater wetlands","authors":"Graham A. Stewart,&nbsp;Michael R. Williams,&nbsp;Gregory W. McCarty,&nbsp;Margaret A. Palmer","doi":"10.1002/lno.70482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wetlands are collectively the largest natural source of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), which complicates the climate mitigation potential of wetland restoration. Land-use change alters wetland soils, vegetation, and hydrology, but the impact of this disturbance legacy on CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes from restored wetlands is uncertain. To better understand CH<sub>4</sub> dynamics across a gradient of human disturbance, we examined 5 yr of continuous CH<sub>4</sub> flux data from a drained, restored, and least-disturbed (“natural”) freshwater mineral-soil wetland. We quantified temporal relationships between CH<sub>4</sub> flux and three key biophysical drivers: soil temperature, gross primary productivity, and hydrology. Using information theoretic and nonlinear state-space reconstruction approaches, we assessed how these relationships varied across different time scales and evaluated evidence for causality. All sites had highest diel CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes at night, primarily driven by gross primary productivity in the natural wetland and soil temperature in the restored and drained wetland. The seasonal scale accounted for most variability in CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes at the natural and restored wetland, with fluxes influenced by the hysteretic causal effects of soil temperature and water level. The effects of seasonal drivers were less evident at the drained site, where fluxes varied more on shorter timescales. Overall, CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes in the natural and restored wetland were comparable in magnitude, had similar temporal patterns, and responded similarly to drivers, indicating convergence in underlying processes. Our work furthers understanding of how land-use history modulates wetland ecosystem processes, which is essential for accurate climate projections and effective management amid global change.</p>","PeriodicalId":18143,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography","volume":"71 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lno.70482","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lno.70482","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wetlands are collectively the largest natural source of methane (CH4), which complicates the climate mitigation potential of wetland restoration. Land-use change alters wetland soils, vegetation, and hydrology, but the impact of this disturbance legacy on CH4 fluxes from restored wetlands is uncertain. To better understand CH4 dynamics across a gradient of human disturbance, we examined 5 yr of continuous CH4 flux data from a drained, restored, and least-disturbed (“natural”) freshwater mineral-soil wetland. We quantified temporal relationships between CH4 flux and three key biophysical drivers: soil temperature, gross primary productivity, and hydrology. Using information theoretic and nonlinear state-space reconstruction approaches, we assessed how these relationships varied across different time scales and evaluated evidence for causality. All sites had highest diel CH4 fluxes at night, primarily driven by gross primary productivity in the natural wetland and soil temperature in the restored and drained wetland. The seasonal scale accounted for most variability in CH4 fluxes at the natural and restored wetland, with fluxes influenced by the hysteretic causal effects of soil temperature and water level. The effects of seasonal drivers were less evident at the drained site, where fluxes varied more on shorter timescales. Overall, CH4 fluxes in the natural and restored wetland were comparable in magnitude, had similar temporal patterns, and responded similarly to drivers, indicating convergence in underlying processes. Our work furthers understanding of how land-use history modulates wetland ecosystem processes, which is essential for accurate climate projections and effective management amid global change.

对比淡水湿地不同土地利用方式甲烷通量的时间驱动因素
湿地是甲烷(ch4)的最大天然来源,这使湿地恢复的气候减缓潜力变得复杂。土地利用变化改变了湿地土壤、植被和水文,但这种扰动遗留对恢复湿地的甲烷通量的影响尚不确定。为了更好地理解甲烷在人为干扰梯度上的动态变化,我们研究了一个排水、恢复和最小干扰(“自然”)淡水矿物-土壤湿地5年的连续甲烷通量数据。我们量化了甲烷通量与三个关键生物物理驱动因素(土壤温度、总初级生产力和水文)之间的时间关系。利用信息理论和非线性状态空间重建方法,我们评估了这些关系在不同时间尺度上的变化,并评估了因果关系的证据。所有样地夜间ch4通量最高,主要受自然湿地的总初级生产力和恢复和排水湿地的土壤温度驱动。自然湿地和恢复湿地的ch4通量主要受季节尺度的影响,且受土壤温度和水位的滞后因果效应影响。在排水场地,季节性驱动因素的影响不太明显,那里的通量在更短的时间尺度上变化更大。总体而言,自然湿地和恢复湿地的甲烷通量在量级上相当,具有相似的时间模式,对驱动因素的响应相似,表明潜在过程具有收敛性。我们的工作进一步了解了土地利用历史如何调节湿地生态系统过程,这对全球变化中准确的气候预测和有效的管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Limnology and Oceanography
Limnology and Oceanography 地学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
254
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Limnology and Oceanography (L&O; print ISSN 0024-3590, online ISSN 1939-5590) publishes original articles, including scholarly reviews, about all aspects of limnology and oceanography. The journal''s unifying theme is the understanding of aquatic systems. Submissions are judged on the originality of their data, interpretations, and ideas, and on the degree to which they can be generalized beyond the particular aquatic system examined. Laboratory and modeling studies must demonstrate relevance to field environments; typically this means that they are bolstered by substantial "real-world" data. Few purely theoretical or purely empirical papers are accepted for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书