The Usefulness of Evenness

IF 7.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2026-08-16 DOI:10.1111/ele.70446
Ryan A. Chisholm
{"title":"The Usefulness of Evenness","authors":"Ryan A. Chisholm","doi":"10.1111/ele.70446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Evenness measures similarity in abundance across species. The term ‘evenness’ was introduced to ecology in 1964, but debate persists about precisely how to measure it and its usefulness as a concept. Here I provide a perspective on both matters. For how to choose evenness metrics, I echo previous calls for the application of the Lorenz-consistency axioms. These axioms are largely non-controversial but have often been neglected, leading to some ongoing use of evenness indices with unintuitive properties. Two widely used evenness metrics, Hill evenness and mean pairwise similarity, satisfy the axioms and are recommended. To assess the usefulness of evenness in ecological research, I focus on two case studies. The first explores how evenness can drive community biomass. The second explores how evenness can indicate the strength of immigration into an ecological community. I conclude that, with appropriately chosen metrics, the concept of evenness can facilitate productive research programmes. Therefore, despite some recently raised objections to it, evenness is a useful concept in ecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"29 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.70446","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70446","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evenness measures similarity in abundance across species. The term ‘evenness’ was introduced to ecology in 1964, but debate persists about precisely how to measure it and its usefulness as a concept. Here I provide a perspective on both matters. For how to choose evenness metrics, I echo previous calls for the application of the Lorenz-consistency axioms. These axioms are largely non-controversial but have often been neglected, leading to some ongoing use of evenness indices with unintuitive properties. Two widely used evenness metrics, Hill evenness and mean pairwise similarity, satisfy the axioms and are recommended. To assess the usefulness of evenness in ecological research, I focus on two case studies. The first explores how evenness can drive community biomass. The second explores how evenness can indicate the strength of immigration into an ecological community. I conclude that, with appropriately chosen metrics, the concept of evenness can facilitate productive research programmes. Therefore, despite some recently raised objections to it, evenness is a useful concept in ecology.

均衡的有用性
均匀度衡量的是物种之间的相似性。“均匀性”一词于1964年被引入生态学,但关于如何精确测量它以及它作为一个概念的实用性的争论一直存在。在此,我就这两个问题提出自己的看法。对于如何选择均匀度度量,我呼应了先前对应用洛伦兹一致性公理的呼吁。这些公理在很大程度上是没有争议的,但经常被忽视,导致一些持续使用的均匀性指标具有不直观的性质。两个广泛使用的均匀度度量,希尔均匀度和平均两两相似度,满足公理,并推荐。为了评估均匀性在生态学研究中的有用性,我着重于两个案例研究。第一部分探讨了均匀度如何驱动群落生物量。第二部分探讨了均匀度如何表明移民进入生态群落的强度。我的结论是,通过适当选择的衡量标准,均衡的概念可以促进富有成效的研究项目。因此,尽管最近提出了一些反对意见,但均匀性在生态学中是一个有用的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology Letters
Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书