Protégé Effect for Behavior Change: Does Teaching Digital Stress Solutions to Others Reduce One's Own?

IF 4.5 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Sameha AlShakhsi, Ala Yankouskaya, Dena Al‐Thani, Raian Ali
{"title":"Protégé Effect for Behavior Change: Does Teaching Digital Stress Solutions to Others Reduce One's Own?","authors":"Sameha AlShakhsi, Ala Yankouskaya, Dena Al‐Thani, Raian Ali","doi":"10.1111/nyas.70368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The protégé effect suggests that individuals learn a subject more effectively when they teach it to others. Can we therefore assume that when individuals with a problematic behavior teach others about it and how to manage it, they become more likely to reduce and better manage that behavior themselves? We address this question by evaluating a protégé‐based approach to reducing and managing digital stress (DS). Over 3 weeks, 137 participants with moderate–high DS were assigned to four groups. Two groups followed a protégé‐based approach: a passive group, given materials to teach, and an active group, given headlines and required to search for and prepare teaching content. Both groups completed three sessions, each focusing on one DS dimension: availability stress, approval anxiety, and fear of missing out. A digital literacy group received content and quizzes, alongside a control group. Outcomes included DS levels, problematic social media use, word of mouth, and issue involvement. Results showed no significant differences between groups. The findings highlight the difficulty of translating cognitive engagement into behavioral change. This study contributes empirical evidence to the digital well‐being literature by illustrating the challenges of enhancing digital well‐being, potentially due to persistent digital habits and socially reinforced stressors.","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.70368","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The protégé effect suggests that individuals learn a subject more effectively when they teach it to others. Can we therefore assume that when individuals with a problematic behavior teach others about it and how to manage it, they become more likely to reduce and better manage that behavior themselves? We address this question by evaluating a protégé‐based approach to reducing and managing digital stress (DS). Over 3 weeks, 137 participants with moderate–high DS were assigned to four groups. Two groups followed a protégé‐based approach: a passive group, given materials to teach, and an active group, given headlines and required to search for and prepare teaching content. Both groups completed three sessions, each focusing on one DS dimension: availability stress, approval anxiety, and fear of missing out. A digital literacy group received content and quizzes, alongside a control group. Outcomes included DS levels, problematic social media use, word of mouth, and issue involvement. Results showed no significant differences between groups. The findings highlight the difficulty of translating cognitive engagement into behavioral change. This study contributes empirical evidence to the digital well‐being literature by illustrating the challenges of enhancing digital well‐being, potentially due to persistent digital habits and socially reinforced stressors.
对行为改变的影响:向他人传授数字压力解决方案会减少自己的压力吗?
质子交换器效应表明,当一个人把一门学科教给别人时,他会更有效地学习这门学科。因此,我们是否可以假设,当有问题行为的人教别人如何管理问题行为时,他们自己就更有可能减少和更好地管理这种行为?我们通过评估一种基于prot的方法来减少和管理数字压力(DS)来解决这个问题。在3周的时间里,137名中高退行性痴呆患者被分为4组。有两组采用了基于prot的方法:被动组,给出教学材料;主动组,给出标题,要求搜索和准备教学内容。两组都完成了三个疗程,每个疗程都集中在一个DS维度上:可用性压力、认可焦虑和对错过的恐惧。数字扫盲组与对照组一起接受内容和测验。结果包括DS水平、有问题的社交媒体使用、口口相传和问题参与。结果显示各组间无显著差异。研究结果强调了将认知参与转化为行为改变的难度。本研究为数字幸福文献提供了经验证据,说明了提高数字幸福的挑战,可能是由于持续的数字习惯和社会强化的压力源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
1.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书