Foundation models in biomedical imaging: turning hype into reality

IF 26.3 1区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Amgad Muneer, Kai Zhang, Ibraheem Hamdi, Rizwan Qureshi, Muhammad Waqas, Shereen Fouad, Hazrat Ali, Syed Muhammad Anwar, Jia Wu
{"title":"Foundation models in biomedical imaging: turning hype into reality","authors":"Amgad Muneer, Kai Zhang, Ibraheem Hamdi, Rizwan Qureshi, Muhammad Waqas, Shereen Fouad, Hazrat Ali, Syed Muhammad Anwar, Jia Wu","doi":"10.1038/s41551-026-01762-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Foundation models (FMs) are driving a prominent shift in biomedical imaging, from task-specific models to unified backbone models for diverse tasks. This opens an avenue to integrate imaging, pathology, clinical records and genomics data into a composite system. However, this vision contrasts sharply with modern medicine’s trajectory towards more granular sub-specialization. This tension, coupled with data scarcity, domain heterogeneity and limited interpretability, creates a gap between benchmark success and real-world clinical value. We argue that the immediate role of FMs lies in augmenting, not replacing, clinical expertise. To separate hype from reality, we introduce real-world evaluation and assessment of FMs (REAL-FM), a multi-dimensional framework assessing data, technical readiness, clinical value, workflow integration and responsible artificial intelligence. Using REAL-FM, we find that although FMs excel in pattern recognition they fall short on causal reasoning, domain robustness and safety. Clinical translation is hindered by scarce representative data for model training, unverified generalization beyond over-simplified benchmark settings and a lack of prospective outcome-based validation. This Perspective provides clinicians with a practical way to interpret FM claims, identify where these systems may safely support imaging workflows and recognize why human oversight remains indispensable. For developers, it defines the validation, workflow, safety and governance requirements that must be met before FMs can become clinically reliable tools. We envision that the path forward lies not in a monolithic medical oracle, but in coordinated subspecialist AI systems that are transparent, safe and clinically grounded. This Perspective assesses the role of foundation models as clinical tools and introduces real-world evaluation and assessment of foundation models (REAL-FM), a framework for assessing data, technical readiness and clinical value towards responsible artificial intelligence.","PeriodicalId":19063,"journal":{"name":"Nature Biomedical Engineering","volume":"10 8","pages":"1557-1575"},"PeriodicalIF":26.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41551-026-01762-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Foundation models (FMs) are driving a prominent shift in biomedical imaging, from task-specific models to unified backbone models for diverse tasks. This opens an avenue to integrate imaging, pathology, clinical records and genomics data into a composite system. However, this vision contrasts sharply with modern medicine’s trajectory towards more granular sub-specialization. This tension, coupled with data scarcity, domain heterogeneity and limited interpretability, creates a gap between benchmark success and real-world clinical value. We argue that the immediate role of FMs lies in augmenting, not replacing, clinical expertise. To separate hype from reality, we introduce real-world evaluation and assessment of FMs (REAL-FM), a multi-dimensional framework assessing data, technical readiness, clinical value, workflow integration and responsible artificial intelligence. Using REAL-FM, we find that although FMs excel in pattern recognition they fall short on causal reasoning, domain robustness and safety. Clinical translation is hindered by scarce representative data for model training, unverified generalization beyond over-simplified benchmark settings and a lack of prospective outcome-based validation. This Perspective provides clinicians with a practical way to interpret FM claims, identify where these systems may safely support imaging workflows and recognize why human oversight remains indispensable. For developers, it defines the validation, workflow, safety and governance requirements that must be met before FMs can become clinically reliable tools. We envision that the path forward lies not in a monolithic medical oracle, but in coordinated subspecialist AI systems that are transparent, safe and clinically grounded. This Perspective assesses the role of foundation models as clinical tools and introduces real-world evaluation and assessment of foundation models (REAL-FM), a framework for assessing data, technical readiness and clinical value towards responsible artificial intelligence.

Abstract Image

生物医学成像的基础模型:将炒作变为现实
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Biomedical Engineering
Nature Biomedical Engineering Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
45.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
138
期刊介绍: Nature Biomedical Engineering is an online-only monthly journal that was launched in January 2017. It aims to publish original research, reviews, and commentary focusing on applied biomedicine and health technology. The journal targets a diverse audience, including life scientists who are involved in developing experimental or computational systems and methods to enhance our understanding of human physiology. It also covers biomedical researchers and engineers who are engaged in designing or optimizing therapies, assays, devices, or procedures for diagnosing or treating diseases. Additionally, clinicians, who make use of research outputs to evaluate patient health or administer therapy in various clinical settings and healthcare contexts, are also part of the target audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书