Shiyu He, Bin Liu, Wei Huang, Bingjie Xu, Yang Li, Wenzhu Shao, Tao Sun
{"title":"Interface-Level Transcript-Assisted Leakage in Raw-Feedback BB84-State Quantum Identity Authentication","authors":"Shiyu He, Bin Liu, Wei Huang, Bingjie Xu, Yang Li, Wenzhu Shao, Tao Sun","doi":"10.1002/qute.70386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Quantum identity authentication (QIA) can provide quantum-interface evidence for quantum secure communication, but its interaction with public transcript handling remains insufficiently characterized. This work analyzes a raw-feedback QIA interface based on BB84 states and operating over an authenticated classical channel, where transcript integrity is protected but receiver feedback is public. First, we establish a no-feedback benchmark: direct impersonation reduces to binary discrimination of value-conditioned BB84 mixed states, for which unambiguous state discrimination is impossible and maximum-confidence discrimination gives no forced-response advantage over minimum-error discrimination. Second, we identify a transcript-conditioned leakage mechanism: when an adversary retains a quantum auxiliary system, public raw feedback can condition that system into a pure-state discrimination instance for basis-selection information. We quantify this leakage using guessing probability, conditional min-entropy, accessible information, and an information-disturbance tradeoff. Third, we separate leakage from exploitation: the leakage becomes an impersonation advantage only under implementation deviations such as key-block reuse, weak session binding, abort-handling failure, or overly permissive thresholds. These results yield conservative authentication-length and threshold conditions for noisy and lossy optical implementations.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72073,"journal":{"name":"Advanced quantum technologies","volume":"9 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced quantum technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qute.70386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Quantum identity authentication (QIA) can provide quantum-interface evidence for quantum secure communication, but its interaction with public transcript handling remains insufficiently characterized. This work analyzes a raw-feedback QIA interface based on BB84 states and operating over an authenticated classical channel, where transcript integrity is protected but receiver feedback is public. First, we establish a no-feedback benchmark: direct impersonation reduces to binary discrimination of value-conditioned BB84 mixed states, for which unambiguous state discrimination is impossible and maximum-confidence discrimination gives no forced-response advantage over minimum-error discrimination. Second, we identify a transcript-conditioned leakage mechanism: when an adversary retains a quantum auxiliary system, public raw feedback can condition that system into a pure-state discrimination instance for basis-selection information. We quantify this leakage using guessing probability, conditional min-entropy, accessible information, and an information-disturbance tradeoff. Third, we separate leakage from exploitation: the leakage becomes an impersonation advantage only under implementation deviations such as key-block reuse, weak session binding, abort-handling failure, or overly permissive thresholds. These results yield conservative authentication-length and threshold conditions for noisy and lossy optical implementations.