Assessing the Environmental and Economic Performance of Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: A Systematic Review of Life Cycle, Techno-Economic, and Integrated Approaches

IF 5.6 3区 材料科学 Q2 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Margaux Millaret, Stig Irving Olsen, Alba Martinez i Quer, Doan Nainggolan
{"title":"Assessing the Environmental and Economic Performance of Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: A Systematic Review of Life Cycle, Techno-Economic, and Integrated Approaches","authors":"Margaux Millaret,&nbsp;Stig Irving Olsen,&nbsp;Alba Martinez i Quer,&nbsp;Doan Nainggolan","doi":"10.1002/adsu.70593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nature-based Solutions such as Constructed wetlands (CWs) are increasingly promoted as sustainable approaches for wastewater treatment due to their expected environmental and economic benefits. To evaluate their performance, a growing body of research has applied life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic methods. This review systematically analyses 101 peer-reviewed articles assessing the environmental and/or economic performance of CWs, following the PRISMA framework. The review examines methodological practices related to functional unit (FU) definition, system boundaries, cost and benefit accounting, key financial assumptions, and sensitivity and uncertainty analysis in both environmental and economic assessments. The results reveal substantial methodological heterogeneity and wide variability in scope and assumptions across studies, due to the absence of harmonized methodological approaches. Only a limited number of studies attempt to integrate environmental and economic analyses beyond parallel assessments. The review discusses pathways toward more robust and integrated environmental–economic assessment frameworks for CWs. Key recommendations include incorporating life-cycle thinking into economic analysis, adopting a removal-efficiency-based FU, and using literature-based values, supported by sensitivity analyses, to account for excluded process. Together, these measures would strengthen CW sustainability assessments, improve comparability across studies, and enhance their usefulness as decision-support tools for nature-based wastewater management and planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":7294,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Sustainable Systems","volume":"10 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/adsu.70593","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Sustainable Systems","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adsu.70593","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nature-based Solutions such as Constructed wetlands (CWs) are increasingly promoted as sustainable approaches for wastewater treatment due to their expected environmental and economic benefits. To evaluate their performance, a growing body of research has applied life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic methods. This review systematically analyses 101 peer-reviewed articles assessing the environmental and/or economic performance of CWs, following the PRISMA framework. The review examines methodological practices related to functional unit (FU) definition, system boundaries, cost and benefit accounting, key financial assumptions, and sensitivity and uncertainty analysis in both environmental and economic assessments. The results reveal substantial methodological heterogeneity and wide variability in scope and assumptions across studies, due to the absence of harmonized methodological approaches. Only a limited number of studies attempt to integrate environmental and economic analyses beyond parallel assessments. The review discusses pathways toward more robust and integrated environmental–economic assessment frameworks for CWs. Key recommendations include incorporating life-cycle thinking into economic analysis, adopting a removal-efficiency-based FU, and using literature-based values, supported by sensitivity analyses, to account for excluded process. Together, these measures would strengthen CW sustainability assessments, improve comparability across studies, and enhance their usefulness as decision-support tools for nature-based wastewater management and planning.

评估人工湿地污水处理的环境和经济性能:生命周期、技术经济和综合方法的系统综述
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advanced Sustainable Systems
Advanced Sustainable Systems Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
186
期刊介绍: Advanced Sustainable Systems, a part of the esteemed Advanced portfolio, serves as an interdisciplinary sustainability science journal. It focuses on impactful research in the advancement of sustainable, efficient, and less wasteful systems and technologies. Aligned with the UN's Sustainable Development Goals, the journal bridges knowledge gaps between fundamental research, implementation, and policy-making. Covering diverse topics such as climate change, food sustainability, environmental science, renewable energy, water, urban development, and socio-economic challenges, it contributes to the understanding and promotion of sustainable systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书