Dynamic compression failure mechanisms in homogeneous mortar and three-dimensional mesoscopic concrete: a comparative study using the split Hopkinson pressure bar

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Jing He, Dianah Mazlan, Fadzli Mohamed Nazri, Mohamad Al-Zaim Omar, Badorul Hisham Abu Bakar
{"title":"Dynamic compression failure mechanisms in homogeneous mortar and three-dimensional mesoscopic concrete: a comparative study using the split Hopkinson pressure bar","authors":"Jing He,&nbsp;Dianah Mazlan,&nbsp;Fadzli Mohamed Nazri,&nbsp;Mohamad Al-Zaim Omar,&nbsp;Badorul Hisham Abu Bakar","doi":"10.1617/s11527-026-03192-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>At the mesoscale, concrete is recognized as a three-phase composite comprising aggregates, mortar, and the interfacial transition zone. Despite mortar’s critical role in concrete’s mechanical behavior, its properties are frequently approximated by simply scaling down those of concrete without rigorous calibration. This approximation hinders a precise understanding of mortar’s contribution to the overall mechanical response and failure mechanisms of concrete. To address this, both quasi-static and dynamic compression tests were conducted to characterize the stress–strain responses and failure patterns of mortar specimens and to establish a quantitative characterization of strain-rate sensitivity. Complementary numerical simulations were performed with a modified Karagozian &amp; Case model calibrated by experimental findings. Comparative analyses were conducted to elucidate distinct differences in failure behaviors between mortar and concrete under dynamic compressive loading. The results revealed that while concrete exhibits greater compressive strength, mortar demonstrates a more pronounced strain-rate effect. This study provides new insights into the dynamic failure behavior of cementitious materials and advances the modeling and safety assessment of concrete structures under impact or blast loading.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":691,"journal":{"name":"Materials and Structures","volume":"59 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-026-03192-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the mesoscale, concrete is recognized as a three-phase composite comprising aggregates, mortar, and the interfacial transition zone. Despite mortar’s critical role in concrete’s mechanical behavior, its properties are frequently approximated by simply scaling down those of concrete without rigorous calibration. This approximation hinders a precise understanding of mortar’s contribution to the overall mechanical response and failure mechanisms of concrete. To address this, both quasi-static and dynamic compression tests were conducted to characterize the stress–strain responses and failure patterns of mortar specimens and to establish a quantitative characterization of strain-rate sensitivity. Complementary numerical simulations were performed with a modified Karagozian & Case model calibrated by experimental findings. Comparative analyses were conducted to elucidate distinct differences in failure behaviors between mortar and concrete under dynamic compressive loading. The results revealed that while concrete exhibits greater compressive strength, mortar demonstrates a more pronounced strain-rate effect. This study provides new insights into the dynamic failure behavior of cementitious materials and advances the modeling and safety assessment of concrete structures under impact or blast loading.

Graphical abstract

均质砂浆与三维细观混凝土的动态压缩破坏机制:采用劈裂霍普金森压杆的对比研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Materials and Structures
Materials and Structures 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
222
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: Materials and Structures, the flagship publication of the International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures (RILEM), provides a unique international and interdisciplinary forum for new research findings on the performance of construction materials. A leader in cutting-edge research, the journal is dedicated to the publication of high quality papers examining the fundamental properties of building materials, their characterization and processing techniques, modeling, standardization of test methods, and the application of research results in building and civil engineering. Materials and Structures also publishes comprehensive reports prepared by the RILEM’s technical committees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书