Scientific analysis of hammerscales excavated from the Chengba and Guantian sites (‌50 BC to AD 400‌) in Southwest China

IF 2 2区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Chenxiaoxue Jia, Tianqiang Sun, Linheng Mo, Fuyao Tan, Hang Xiao, Qiang Li, Chenxi Liang, Yuming Xu, Jake Glover, Yuniu Li
{"title":"Scientific analysis of hammerscales excavated from the Chengba and Guantian sites (‌50 BC to AD 400‌) in Southwest China","authors":"Chenxiaoxue Jia,&nbsp;Tianqiang Sun,&nbsp;Linheng Mo,&nbsp;Fuyao Tan,&nbsp;Hang Xiao,&nbsp;Qiang Li,&nbsp;Chenxi Liang,&nbsp;Yuming Xu,&nbsp;Jake Glover,&nbsp;Yuniu Li","doi":"10.1007/s12520-026-02548-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study of hammerscale is a key for identifying ancient forging sites and restoring iron and steel forging processes, while the systematic research on hammerscale from Han-Jin periods sites in southwest China is still insufficient, and a unified identification standard for archaeological hammerscale has not been formed in China. In this paper, 21 ancient hammerscale samples excavated from Chengba site (Sichuan) and Guantian site (Hunan) were taken as the research objects, with 4 modern traditional forging hammerscale samples as the control group. Metallographic microscopy and SEM-EDS analysis were used to carry out systematic scientific analysis on the microstructure and chemical composition of the samples. The results show that the core identification indicators of archaeological hammerscale are the microstructure has a layered iron oxide structure formed by high-temperature forging oxidation, or chain silicate inclusions distributed along the forging direction; the main component is iron oxide (often &gt; 90%), and the trace element characteristics are related to raw materials, fuel and flux in the forging process. There are significant differences in the content of CaO, SO<sub>3</sub> and P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> between ancient and modern samples, which are mainly caused by the differences in smelting and forging processes, fuel types and raw material background. This study clarifies the formation mechanism of hammerscale and its indicative significance for forging technology, provides a standardized identification basis for forging relics in field archaeological work, and supplements basic comparative data for the study of iron and steel forging technology in the Han-Jin periods in southwest China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"18 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-026-02548-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study of hammerscale is a key for identifying ancient forging sites and restoring iron and steel forging processes, while the systematic research on hammerscale from Han-Jin periods sites in southwest China is still insufficient, and a unified identification standard for archaeological hammerscale has not been formed in China. In this paper, 21 ancient hammerscale samples excavated from Chengba site (Sichuan) and Guantian site (Hunan) were taken as the research objects, with 4 modern traditional forging hammerscale samples as the control group. Metallographic microscopy and SEM-EDS analysis were used to carry out systematic scientific analysis on the microstructure and chemical composition of the samples. The results show that the core identification indicators of archaeological hammerscale are the microstructure has a layered iron oxide structure formed by high-temperature forging oxidation, or chain silicate inclusions distributed along the forging direction; the main component is iron oxide (often > 90%), and the trace element characteristics are related to raw materials, fuel and flux in the forging process. There are significant differences in the content of CaO, SO3 and P2O5 between ancient and modern samples, which are mainly caused by the differences in smelting and forging processes, fuel types and raw material background. This study clarifies the formation mechanism of hammerscale and its indicative significance for forging technology, provides a standardized identification basis for forging relics in field archaeological work, and supplements basic comparative data for the study of iron and steel forging technology in the Han-Jin periods in southwest China.

中国西南城坝和官田遗址(公元前50年至公元400年)锤鳞的科学分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
199
期刊介绍: Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research. Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science. The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书