Assessing the Targeting Efficiency of Clean Water Subsidies Under Uncertainty

IF 3.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Hannah Williams, Sreedhar Upendram, James Mingie, Seong-Hoon Cho
{"title":"Assessing the Targeting Efficiency of Clean Water Subsidies Under Uncertainty","authors":"Hannah Williams,&nbsp;Sreedhar Upendram,&nbsp;James Mingie,&nbsp;Seong-Hoon Cho","doi":"10.1007/s00267-026-02581-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Access to affordable clean water remains a critical challenge for many communities in the United States, particularly those with limited fiscal capacity. This study evaluates the risk-return efficiency of Clean Water State Revolving Fund principal forgiveness in Tennessee from 2019 to 2022 using a Modern Portfolio Theory framework. The analysis explicitly incorporates uncertainty arising from year-to-year changes in community economic and demographic conditions and from potential shifts in how economic distress is weighted in state program priorities. Expected return is defined as the alignment with economic distress (represented by the inverse of a county’s affordability score), so higher returns correspond to greater socioeconomic need, while risk is measured as the standard deviation of portfolio returns across uncertainty scenarios. These measures are used to construct an efficient frontier representing optimal subsidy targeting. Results show that historical allocations consistently fell below the efficient frontier, with the efficiency gap widening over time as portfolio risk increased more rapidly than expected returns. Although alignment with economic distress improved modestly, these gains were accompanied by greater variability in allocation performance, indicating declining reliability in need targeting. The findings demonstrate that substantial improvements in risk–return efficiency and alignment with economic distress were theoretically achievable without increasing exposure to outcome uncertainty, particularly by reallocating funds toward counties with lower affordability scores. Because the unconstrained frontier represents an infeasible theoretical upper bound, these results indicate the direction and scale of potential gains rather than specific targets. Overall, uncertainty-aware frameworks help refine eligibility rules and direct limited public resources toward communities facing the greatest economic strain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":"76 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-026-02581-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Access to affordable clean water remains a critical challenge for many communities in the United States, particularly those with limited fiscal capacity. This study evaluates the risk-return efficiency of Clean Water State Revolving Fund principal forgiveness in Tennessee from 2019 to 2022 using a Modern Portfolio Theory framework. The analysis explicitly incorporates uncertainty arising from year-to-year changes in community economic and demographic conditions and from potential shifts in how economic distress is weighted in state program priorities. Expected return is defined as the alignment with economic distress (represented by the inverse of a county’s affordability score), so higher returns correspond to greater socioeconomic need, while risk is measured as the standard deviation of portfolio returns across uncertainty scenarios. These measures are used to construct an efficient frontier representing optimal subsidy targeting. Results show that historical allocations consistently fell below the efficient frontier, with the efficiency gap widening over time as portfolio risk increased more rapidly than expected returns. Although alignment with economic distress improved modestly, these gains were accompanied by greater variability in allocation performance, indicating declining reliability in need targeting. The findings demonstrate that substantial improvements in risk–return efficiency and alignment with economic distress were theoretically achievable without increasing exposure to outcome uncertainty, particularly by reallocating funds toward counties with lower affordability scores. Because the unconstrained frontier represents an infeasible theoretical upper bound, these results indicate the direction and scale of potential gains rather than specific targets. Overall, uncertainty-aware frameworks help refine eligibility rules and direct limited public resources toward communities facing the greatest economic strain.

不确定条件下清洁水补贴目标效率评估
获得负担得起的清洁用水仍然是美国许多社区面临的重大挑战,特别是那些财政能力有限的社区。本研究利用现代投资组合理论框架评估了2019 - 2022年田纳西州清洁水州循环基金本金减免的风险收益效率。该分析明确纳入了社区经济和人口状况逐年变化带来的不确定性,以及经济困境在国家计划优先事项中权重的潜在变化。预期收益被定义为与经济困境的一致性(由一个国家的负担能力得分的倒数表示),因此更高的收益对应于更大的社会经济需求,而风险是通过不确定性情景下投资组合收益的标准差来衡量的。这些度量被用来构造一个代表最优补贴目标的有效边界。结果显示,历史配置一直低于有效边界,随着时间的推移,效率差距扩大,因为投资组合风险的增长速度快于预期回报。尽管与经济困境的一致性略有改善,但这些收益伴随着分配绩效的更大变化,表明需求定位的可靠性下降。研究结果表明,在不增加结果不确定性的情况下,特别是通过将资金重新分配给负担能力得分较低的县,理论上可以实现风险回报效率和经济困境一致性的大幅提高。因为无约束边界代表了一个不可行的理论上限,这些结果表明了潜在收益的方向和规模,而不是具体的目标。总体而言,意识到不确定性的框架有助于完善资格规则,并将有限的公共资源用于面临最大经济压力的社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书