Can energy communities reduce energy poverty? A georeferenced framework proposal to support decision-makers

IF 3.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Diana Neves, Cláudia Sousa Monteiro
{"title":"Can energy communities reduce energy poverty? A georeferenced framework proposal to support decision-makers","authors":"Diana Neves,&nbsp;Cláudia Sousa Monteiro","doi":"10.1007/s12053-026-10460-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Energy communities (ECs) are increasingly promoted as a tool for decarbonisation, local participation, and social inclusion. Meanwhile, the EU Renewable Energy Directive requires ECs to provide support in reducing energy poverty by lowering grid consumption and electricity supply tariffs. Yet, their potential to mitigate energy poverty remains insufficiently operationalised in spatially explicit decision-support frameworks. This paper develops a conceptual georeferenced framework informed by a focused literature review on energy poverty, energy communities, urban building energy modelling and multi-objective optimization, to prioritise the deployment of inclusive solar energy communities in urban areas, according to household vulnerability to energy poverty. The proposed framework integrates spatial data, vulnerability indicators, building energy performance, renewable generation potential, and policy-relevant prioritisation criteria, using a multi-criteria decision analysis approach, to help local authorities identify where ECs are most likely to deliver both energy and social benefits. This conceptual framework classifies intervention areas into different priority levels to support decision-makers on where to focus inclusive solar ECs implementation efforts, providing additional economic, social and environmental outputs, such as estimated EC investment and payback times, CO<sub>2</sub> emission reduction or the burden reduction of the energy bills in the overall households’ income. Main limitations refer to irregular data availability and the lack of validation close to vulnerable populations, and policy and governance structures. Nevertheless, the framework can help local authorities identify where solar EC deployment may generate the strongest energy poverty mitigation and clarify what data is needed to support its implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"19 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Efficiency","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-026-10460-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy communities (ECs) are increasingly promoted as a tool for decarbonisation, local participation, and social inclusion. Meanwhile, the EU Renewable Energy Directive requires ECs to provide support in reducing energy poverty by lowering grid consumption and electricity supply tariffs. Yet, their potential to mitigate energy poverty remains insufficiently operationalised in spatially explicit decision-support frameworks. This paper develops a conceptual georeferenced framework informed by a focused literature review on energy poverty, energy communities, urban building energy modelling and multi-objective optimization, to prioritise the deployment of inclusive solar energy communities in urban areas, according to household vulnerability to energy poverty. The proposed framework integrates spatial data, vulnerability indicators, building energy performance, renewable generation potential, and policy-relevant prioritisation criteria, using a multi-criteria decision analysis approach, to help local authorities identify where ECs are most likely to deliver both energy and social benefits. This conceptual framework classifies intervention areas into different priority levels to support decision-makers on where to focus inclusive solar ECs implementation efforts, providing additional economic, social and environmental outputs, such as estimated EC investment and payback times, CO2 emission reduction or the burden reduction of the energy bills in the overall households’ income. Main limitations refer to irregular data availability and the lack of validation close to vulnerable populations, and policy and governance structures. Nevertheless, the framework can help local authorities identify where solar EC deployment may generate the strongest energy poverty mitigation and clarify what data is needed to support its implementation.

能源社区能减少能源贫困吗?支持决策者的地理参考框架建议
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Efficiency
Energy Efficiency ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Efficiency covers wide-ranging aspects of energy efficiency in the residential, tertiary, industrial and transport sectors. Coverage includes a number of different topics and disciplines including energy efficiency policies at local, regional, national and international levels; long term impact of energy efficiency; technologies to improve energy efficiency; consumer behavior and the dynamics of consumption; socio-economic impacts of energy efficiency measures; energy efficiency as a virtual utility; transportation issues; building issues; energy management systems and energy services; energy planning and risk assessment; energy efficiency in developing countries and economies in transition; non-energy benefits of energy efficiency and opportunities for policy integration; energy education and training, and emerging technologies. See Aims and Scope for more details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书