Stochastic Framework for Extracting Worst Case Test Vectors in ASICs Under Single-Event Effects

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-09 DOI:10.1109/TNS.2026.3701522
Mostafa M. Abdelrazik;Mostafa A. Hemeda;Ahmed I. Mohamed;Rawan A. Elomda;Mostafa M. Ghouneem;Ahmed A. Abou-Auf
{"title":"Stochastic Framework for Extracting Worst Case Test Vectors in ASICs Under Single-Event Effects","authors":"Mostafa M. Abdelrazik;Mostafa A. Hemeda;Ahmed I. Mohamed;Rawan A. Elomda;Mostafa M. Ghouneem;Ahmed A. Abou-Auf","doi":"10.1109/TNS.2026.3701522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a stochastic framework for identifying worst-case test vectors (WCTVs) that maximize the single-event transient (SET) vulnerability in application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs). The proposed approach integrates cell-level SET sensitivity modeling with probabilistic transfer matrices (PTMs) and a novel Euclidean-norm error metric to systematically evaluate thousands of candidate vectors derived from industry-standard test suites. For each test vector, stimulus probabilities are propagated through gate-level netlists (based on XFAB XH018 technology) to quantify primary-output perturbations relative to error-free baselines. The framework has been rigorously validated using Cadence Virtuoso transient simulations on ISCAS’85 benchmark circuits. Results show that the proposed methodology achieves accuracy comparable to transistor-level simulation while reducing computational cost by several orders of magnitude. In addition, the automated flow ensures scalability to complex ASIC designs. Results demonstrate that WCTVs induce <inline-formula> <tex-math>$2.2\\times $ </tex-math></inline-formula> more errors (SET-sensitive nodes) than random vectors, leading to a 56% reduction in conservative mean time between failures (MTBFs) estimates, highlighting the necessity of worst-case analysis for radiation hardness assurance. We show that neglecting worst-case analysis leads to systematically overstated reliability projections in radiation environments, highlighting the necessity of WCTV-based hardness assurance for mission-critical ASICs.","PeriodicalId":13406,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science","volume":"73 8","pages":"2822-2829"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11556368/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present a stochastic framework for identifying worst-case test vectors (WCTVs) that maximize the single-event transient (SET) vulnerability in application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs). The proposed approach integrates cell-level SET sensitivity modeling with probabilistic transfer matrices (PTMs) and a novel Euclidean-norm error metric to systematically evaluate thousands of candidate vectors derived from industry-standard test suites. For each test vector, stimulus probabilities are propagated through gate-level netlists (based on XFAB XH018 technology) to quantify primary-output perturbations relative to error-free baselines. The framework has been rigorously validated using Cadence Virtuoso transient simulations on ISCAS’85 benchmark circuits. Results show that the proposed methodology achieves accuracy comparable to transistor-level simulation while reducing computational cost by several orders of magnitude. In addition, the automated flow ensures scalability to complex ASIC designs. Results demonstrate that WCTVs induce $2.2\times $ more errors (SET-sensitive nodes) than random vectors, leading to a 56% reduction in conservative mean time between failures (MTBFs) estimates, highlighting the necessity of worst-case analysis for radiation hardness assurance. We show that neglecting worst-case analysis leads to systematically overstated reliability projections in radiation environments, highlighting the necessity of WCTV-based hardness assurance for mission-critical ASICs.
单事件影响下asic中最坏情况测试向量提取的随机框架
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
27.80%
发文量
314
审稿时长
6.2 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science is a publication of the IEEE Nuclear and Plasma Sciences Society. It is viewed as the primary source of technical information in many of the areas it covers. As judged by JCR impact factor, TNS consistently ranks in the top five journals in the category of Nuclear Science & Technology. It has one of the higher immediacy indices, indicating that the information it publishes is viewed as timely, and has a relatively long citation half-life, indicating that the published information also is viewed as valuable for a number of years. The IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science is published bimonthly. Its scope includes all aspects of the theory and application of nuclear science and engineering. It focuses on instrumentation for the detection and measurement of ionizing radiation; particle accelerators and their controls; nuclear medicine and its application; effects of radiation on materials, components, and systems; reactor instrumentation and controls; and measurement of radiation in space.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书