Yeye Tang;Xu Du;Jui-Long Hung;Minjuan Wang;Tingyin Ding
{"title":"Enhancing Collaborative Problem Solving Through AI Personal Assistant Interactions: Insights From Diverse Prior Knowledge Groups","authors":"Yeye Tang;Xu Du;Jui-Long Hung;Minjuan Wang;Tingyin Ding","doi":"10.1109/TLT.2026.3713908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collaborative problem-solving (CPS) activities encourage learners to share knowledge and complete complex tasks together. However, learners with insufficient prior knowledge may struggle to contribute effectively to these tasks. Appropriate support is, therefore, needed to help learners address challenges that arise during CPS. This study developed an AI personal assistant (AIPA) embedded with a ChatGPT-based large language model to serve as a personal consultant in CPS activities by providing personalized knowledge, resources, and guidance. This design raises an important question about how AI assistance is associated with learners’ interaction patterns and the quality of collaboration. By analyzing student dialogues and interactions with the AIPA, this study found no significant differences in CPS performance among high-, mixed-, and low-knowledge groups after using the AIPA. However, both mixed- and low-knowledge groups interacted with the AIPA more frequently than the high-knowledge groups. Analysis of question types further showed significant differences, with explanation-oriented questions being more common in low-knowledge groups. In addition, high-knowledge groups interacted minimally with the AIPA, low-knowledge groups engaged consistently, and mix-knowledge groups showed moderate interaction, with shifting question types across the CPS process. The results also showed that groups with lower prior knowledge relied more on information provided by the AIPA in their discussions. These findings suggest that the AIPA can serve as a supportive resource in CPS contexts and contribute to understanding students’ interaction patterns with AI support in educational settings.","PeriodicalId":49191,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies","volume":"19 ","pages":"766-777"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11611545/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Collaborative problem-solving (CPS) activities encourage learners to share knowledge and complete complex tasks together. However, learners with insufficient prior knowledge may struggle to contribute effectively to these tasks. Appropriate support is, therefore, needed to help learners address challenges that arise during CPS. This study developed an AI personal assistant (AIPA) embedded with a ChatGPT-based large language model to serve as a personal consultant in CPS activities by providing personalized knowledge, resources, and guidance. This design raises an important question about how AI assistance is associated with learners’ interaction patterns and the quality of collaboration. By analyzing student dialogues and interactions with the AIPA, this study found no significant differences in CPS performance among high-, mixed-, and low-knowledge groups after using the AIPA. However, both mixed- and low-knowledge groups interacted with the AIPA more frequently than the high-knowledge groups. Analysis of question types further showed significant differences, with explanation-oriented questions being more common in low-knowledge groups. In addition, high-knowledge groups interacted minimally with the AIPA, low-knowledge groups engaged consistently, and mix-knowledge groups showed moderate interaction, with shifting question types across the CPS process. The results also showed that groups with lower prior knowledge relied more on information provided by the AIPA in their discussions. These findings suggest that the AIPA can serve as a supportive resource in CPS contexts and contribute to understanding students’ interaction patterns with AI support in educational settings.
期刊介绍:
The IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies covers all advances in learning technologies and their applications, including but not limited to the following topics: innovative online learning systems; intelligent tutors; educational games; simulation systems for education and training; collaborative learning tools; learning with mobile devices; wearable devices and interfaces for learning; personalized and adaptive learning systems; tools for formative and summative assessment; tools for learning analytics and educational data mining; ontologies for learning systems; standards and web services that support learning; authoring tools for learning materials; computer support for peer tutoring; learning via computer-mediated inquiry, field, and lab work; social learning techniques; social networks and infrastructures for learning and knowledge sharing; and creation and management of learning objects.