Comparative Efficacy of Herbal Products for Improving Liver Enzymes and Inflammation in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

IF 3.3
Gastro hep advances Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-02 DOI:10.1016/j.gastha.2026.101045
Alejandro Chen Liang, Yeison Cruz Castillo, Mariela Denise Fermin Madera, Revathi Thirumushi Sairaj, Jose Medina, Tatiana Alexandra Moreno Díaz, Supritha Chintamaneni, Gabriela Flores Monar, Camila Sanchez Cruz, Rashmi Advani, Sushovan Guha, Ernesto Calderón-Martinez
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Herbal Products for Improving Liver Enzymes and Inflammation in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis","authors":"Alejandro Chen Liang,&nbsp;Yeison Cruz Castillo,&nbsp;Mariela Denise Fermin Madera,&nbsp;Revathi Thirumushi Sairaj,&nbsp;Jose Medina,&nbsp;Tatiana Alexandra Moreno Díaz,&nbsp;Supritha Chintamaneni,&nbsp;Gabriela Flores Monar,&nbsp;Camila Sanchez Cruz,&nbsp;Rashmi Advani,&nbsp;Sushovan Guha,&nbsp;Ernesto Calderón-Martinez","doi":"10.1016/j.gastha.2026.101045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis (MASH) affect adults worldwide and are causes of morbidity. While lifestyle modification remains in first-line therapy, interest has emerged in herbal agents with potential hepatometabolic effects. Evidence synthesis has been limited by heterogeneity in formulations and study quality. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy of herbal therapies in MASLD/MASH.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews registration (CRD420251157401), PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched through September 2025 for randomized controlled trials evaluating herbal therapies or derivatives in adults with MASLD/MASH. The primary outcomes included alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and liver stiffness. Random-effects NMAs estimated mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals, with treatment ranking using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0, and certainty of evidence using Confidence in NMA.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across 131 randomized trials (n = 9191), several herbal interventions significantly improved liver enzymes. In the NMA for alanine aminotransferase, the greatest reductions were seen with artichoke leaf (MD -28.32; <em>P</em> &lt; .01), cinnamon (MD -25.10; <em>P</em> = .01), and piperine (MD -25.39; <em>P</em> = .01), with artichoke leaf achieving the highest SUCRA (0.93). For aspartate aminotransferase, significant reductions were observed for cinnamon (MD -23.50; <em>P</em> &lt; .01), berberine (MD -19.63; <em>P</em> &lt; .01), and bergamot + CyC (MD -17.83; <em>P</em> &lt; .01), with cinnamon being the most effective (SUCRA 0.96). For gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, significant reductions were observed with cinnamon (MD -12.44; <em>P</em> = .01), garlic + silymarin (MD -10.92; <em>P</em> = .01), and berberine (MD -9.74; <em>P</em> = .01). For liver stiffness, only curcumin (MD -0.76; <em>P</em> = .03) and pomegranate (MD -0.86; <em>P</em> = .04) were statistically significant, despite higher SUCRA rankings favoring silymarin (0.81) and hesperidin + flaxseed (0.79). The secondary outcomes showed variable effects on steatosis and fibrosis indices without consistent metabolic significance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This analysis found that several herbal preparations may improve biochemical markers in MASLD and MASH, though results varied and require cautious interpretation given formulation and regulatory inconsistencies. Future work should focus on the most consistently performing agents: cinnamon, curcumin, silymarin, berberine, artichoke leaf, and <em>Nigella sativa</em>. This should involve standardized production, dose-finding studies, purity verification, and mainly long-term safety evaluation before any clinical integration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73130,"journal":{"name":"Gastro hep advances","volume":"5 9","pages":"Article 101045"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastro hep advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772572326001664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis (MASH) affect adults worldwide and are causes of morbidity. While lifestyle modification remains in first-line therapy, interest has emerged in herbal agents with potential hepatometabolic effects. Evidence synthesis has been limited by heterogeneity in formulations and study quality. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy of herbal therapies in MASLD/MASH.

Methods

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews registration (CRD420251157401), PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched through September 2025 for randomized controlled trials evaluating herbal therapies or derivatives in adults with MASLD/MASH. The primary outcomes included alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and liver stiffness. Random-effects NMAs estimated mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals, with treatment ranking using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0, and certainty of evidence using Confidence in NMA.

Results

Across 131 randomized trials (n = 9191), several herbal interventions significantly improved liver enzymes. In the NMA for alanine aminotransferase, the greatest reductions were seen with artichoke leaf (MD -28.32; P < .01), cinnamon (MD -25.10; P = .01), and piperine (MD -25.39; P = .01), with artichoke leaf achieving the highest SUCRA (0.93). For aspartate aminotransferase, significant reductions were observed for cinnamon (MD -23.50; P < .01), berberine (MD -19.63; P < .01), and bergamot + CyC (MD -17.83; P < .01), with cinnamon being the most effective (SUCRA 0.96). For gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, significant reductions were observed with cinnamon (MD -12.44; P = .01), garlic + silymarin (MD -10.92; P = .01), and berberine (MD -9.74; P = .01). For liver stiffness, only curcumin (MD -0.76; P = .03) and pomegranate (MD -0.86; P = .04) were statistically significant, despite higher SUCRA rankings favoring silymarin (0.81) and hesperidin + flaxseed (0.79). The secondary outcomes showed variable effects on steatosis and fibrosis indices without consistent metabolic significance.

Conclusion

This analysis found that several herbal preparations may improve biochemical markers in MASLD and MASH, though results varied and require cautious interpretation given formulation and regulatory inconsistencies. Future work should focus on the most consistently performing agents: cinnamon, curcumin, silymarin, berberine, artichoke leaf, and Nigella sativa. This should involve standardized production, dose-finding studies, purity verification, and mainly long-term safety evaluation before any clinical integration.
草药产品改善代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病肝酶和炎症的比较疗效:系统综述和网络荟萃分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastro hep advances
Gastro hep advances Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
64 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书