Chevron versus transverse osteotomies in intercalary reconstructions – Lessons learned from cadaveric biomechanical study about mechanical stability and biological implications

Q3 Medicine
Annals of 3D printed medicine Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-06 DOI:10.1016/j.stlm.2026.100238
H․Chien Nguyen, Whitney L. Kenswiel, Michiel A.J. van de Sande, David D. Krijgh, Jonneke S. Kuperus, Nico Verdonschot, Ingrid C.M. van der Geest, Cindy G.J. Cleypool, Lizz van der Heijden
{"title":"Chevron versus transverse osteotomies in intercalary reconstructions – Lessons learned from cadaveric biomechanical study about mechanical stability and biological implications","authors":"H․Chien Nguyen,&nbsp;Whitney L. Kenswiel,&nbsp;Michiel A.J. van de Sande,&nbsp;David D. Krijgh,&nbsp;Jonneke S. Kuperus,&nbsp;Nico Verdonschot,&nbsp;Ingrid C.M. van der Geest,&nbsp;Cindy G.J. Cleypool,&nbsp;Lizz van der Heijden","doi":"10.1016/j.stlm.2026.100238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intercalary allograft reconstruction of long bone defects faces challenges such as nonunion and graft failure. Biomechanical stability and available bone surface area are important for allograft union and treatment success. While the transverse osteotomy is frequently used, the Chevron osteotomy may provide improved biomechanical stability and increased available bone surface area compared to the transverse technique.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study included ten cadaveric to evaluate the biomechanical stability under axial and torsional loading.The ten tibiae were reconstructed with either the transverse (n = 5) or the Chevron (n = 5) osteotomy technique for intercalary reconstructions, each guided with 3D printed patient specific sawguides. Loading conditions were chosen to mimic peak forces occurring during normal gait. Interfragmentary motion (mm) at the osteotomy interface was measured using digital image correlation techniques. Available bone surface area (mm<sup>2</sup>) was calculated from 3D models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Under axial loading the Chevron osteotomy configuration resulted in a mean interfragmentary motion of 0.4 mm (95% CI 0.3 mm – 0.5 mm) versus 0.2 mm (95% CI 0.1 mm – 0.2 mm) in the transverse osteotomy group. Under torsional loading there was no difference observed between the Chevron and transverse osteotomy group. Available bone surface area was higher in the Chevron osteotomy group when compared to the transverse osteotomy group, with a mean of 758 mm<sup>2</sup> (95% CI 616 mm<sup>2</sup> – 900 mm<sup>2</sup>) versus a mean of 575 mm<sup>2</sup> (95% CI 491 mm<sup>2</sup> – 659 mm<sup>2</sup>)</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Chevron osteotomies offer a theoretical biological advantage through increased surface area. However, this advantage depends strongly on precise execution and sustained interfragmentary compression across the osteotomy plane and without these conditions, the potential benefits may not be achieved.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72210,"journal":{"name":"Annals of 3D printed medicine","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of 3D printed medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964126000135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intercalary allograft reconstruction of long bone defects faces challenges such as nonunion and graft failure. Biomechanical stability and available bone surface area are important for allograft union and treatment success. While the transverse osteotomy is frequently used, the Chevron osteotomy may provide improved biomechanical stability and increased available bone surface area compared to the transverse technique.

Methods

This study included ten cadaveric to evaluate the biomechanical stability under axial and torsional loading.The ten tibiae were reconstructed with either the transverse (n = 5) or the Chevron (n = 5) osteotomy technique for intercalary reconstructions, each guided with 3D printed patient specific sawguides. Loading conditions were chosen to mimic peak forces occurring during normal gait. Interfragmentary motion (mm) at the osteotomy interface was measured using digital image correlation techniques. Available bone surface area (mm2) was calculated from 3D models.

Results

Under axial loading the Chevron osteotomy configuration resulted in a mean interfragmentary motion of 0.4 mm (95% CI 0.3 mm – 0.5 mm) versus 0.2 mm (95% CI 0.1 mm – 0.2 mm) in the transverse osteotomy group. Under torsional loading there was no difference observed between the Chevron and transverse osteotomy group. Available bone surface area was higher in the Chevron osteotomy group when compared to the transverse osteotomy group, with a mean of 758 mm2 (95% CI 616 mm2 – 900 mm2) versus a mean of 575 mm2 (95% CI 491 mm2 – 659 mm2)

Conclusions

Chevron osteotomies offer a theoretical biological advantage through increased surface area. However, this advantage depends strongly on precise execution and sustained interfragmentary compression across the osteotomy plane and without these conditions, the potential benefits may not be achieved.
横截骨与横截骨在椎间骨重建中的对比——从尸体生物力学研究中获得的关于力学稳定性和生物学意义的经验教训
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of 3D printed medicine
Annals of 3D printed medicine Medicine and Dentistry (General), Materials Science (General)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
131 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书