A scoping review on behavioral, subjective, and physiological approaches towards human detection of natural vs synthetic stimuli: State of the art and quality assessment

IF 5.5 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Computers in human behavior reports Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-28 DOI:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101221
César Villacura-Herrera, Frank T.J.M. Zaal, Ralf F.A. Cox
{"title":"A scoping review on behavioral, subjective, and physiological approaches towards human detection of natural vs synthetic stimuli: State of the art and quality assessment","authors":"César Villacura-Herrera,&nbsp;Frank T.J.M. Zaal,&nbsp;Ralf F.A. Cox","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent advances in artificial intelligence, along with the increasing availability of generative models, have enabled the production of highly realistic synthetic content across multiple modalities. The increasing realism of these synthetic outputs raises important questions regarding the human ability to detect them, representing a new challenge for human perception at multiple levels. Addressing this requires an integrative approach focused not only on behavioral performance, but also subjective experience and physiological indicators. The present review synthesizes the empirical evidence on human detection of natural and synthetic stimuli across images, text, audio and video, particularly examining responses at behavioral, subjective and physiological levels, while also providing an examination of the overall quality of current research efforts in this field. A systematic search was conducted across five databases following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, identifying a total of 97 eligible studies. Across the literature, most studies have focused on behavioral approaches (94.85%), consistently revealing that detection performance is often near chance level in particular for highly realistic visual stimuli. A strong dissociation between accuracy rates and subjective confidence is also frequently reported, with these evaluations being shaped by familiarity and contextual cues. Physiological evidence further suggests that natural and synthetic stimuli can produce distinguishable patterns of gaze and neural activity, even when behavioral accuracy does not reflect these differences. Overall, the literature shows high methodological heterogeneity and limitations in stimulus control and reporting practices. These findings highlight the need for integrative approaches to better understand human detection and inform strategies for improving judgements in digital environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 101221"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958826002952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advances in artificial intelligence, along with the increasing availability of generative models, have enabled the production of highly realistic synthetic content across multiple modalities. The increasing realism of these synthetic outputs raises important questions regarding the human ability to detect them, representing a new challenge for human perception at multiple levels. Addressing this requires an integrative approach focused not only on behavioral performance, but also subjective experience and physiological indicators. The present review synthesizes the empirical evidence on human detection of natural and synthetic stimuli across images, text, audio and video, particularly examining responses at behavioral, subjective and physiological levels, while also providing an examination of the overall quality of current research efforts in this field. A systematic search was conducted across five databases following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, identifying a total of 97 eligible studies. Across the literature, most studies have focused on behavioral approaches (94.85%), consistently revealing that detection performance is often near chance level in particular for highly realistic visual stimuli. A strong dissociation between accuracy rates and subjective confidence is also frequently reported, with these evaluations being shaped by familiarity and contextual cues. Physiological evidence further suggests that natural and synthetic stimuli can produce distinguishable patterns of gaze and neural activity, even when behavioral accuracy does not reflect these differences. Overall, the literature shows high methodological heterogeneity and limitations in stimulus control and reporting practices. These findings highlight the need for integrative approaches to better understand human detection and inform strategies for improving judgements in digital environments.
人类检测自然与合成刺激的行为、主观和生理方法的范围综述:最新进展和质量评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书