Adipose Reserves and Survival: Protective in Prefrail but Ineffective in Frail Oldest‐Old

IF 9.1 1区 医学
Jin Yan, Ming Zhao, Cheng Qin, Zhihui Zhu, Ning Di, Bingjie Lu, Cunmei Yang, Qiuli Xu, Zheng Liu, Li Fan, Yixin Hu
{"title":"Adipose Reserves and Survival: Protective in Prefrail but Ineffective in Frail Oldest‐Old","authors":"Jin Yan, Ming Zhao, Cheng Qin, Zhihui Zhu, Ning Di, Bingjie Lu, Cunmei Yang, Qiuli Xu, Zheng Liu, Li Fan, Yixin Hu","doi":"10.1002/jcsm.70358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim Among the oldest‐old, the impact of body composition on survival outcomes exhibits pronounced heterogeneity. Although the obesity paradox has been widely discussed, clear evidence is still lacking regarding whether the biological effects of adipose reserves are modulated by functional status. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the association between adipose reserve indicators and long‐term all‐cause mortality risk in the oldest‐old and to elucidate the regulatory role of frailty, thereby providing an evidence‐based foundation for precision clinical health management. Methods This prospective cohort study included 529 community‐dwelling oldest‐old individuals. Participants were categorized into prefrailty and frailty groups at baseline using the Fried frailty phenotype. Bioelectrical impedance analysis was utilized to measure body composition. Stratified multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to evaluate the relationship between adipose indicators and all‐cause mortality. Additionally, restricted cubic splines (RCS) and Kaplan–Meier curves were used to analyse survival heterogeneity. Results During a median follow‐up of 3.84 years, 88 deaths (16.6%) occurred. In the prefrail oldest‐old, adipose reserves exhibited significant protective effects on survival: The fully adjusted model showed that PBF (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87–0.98, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.006), VFA (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97–0.99, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.013) and WHR (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86–0.95, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) were all inversely associated with mortality risk. In contrast, these protective effects vanished in the frail oldest‐old (all <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &gt; 0.05), suggesting that the benefits of adipose tissue are contingent upon the individual's basal functional reserve. RCS analysis revealed a linear dose–response relationship between adipose indicators and mortality risk (all <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> for non‐linearity &gt; 0.05), with no significant threshold effect observed. Interaction analyses confirmed that frailty status significantly modulated the prognostic value of adipose metrics ( <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.05), with protective effects restricted exclusively to prefrail individuals. Kaplan–Meier curves confirmed that individuals in the prefrailty stage with higher adipose reserves achieved the highest survival rates (all Log‐rank <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). Conclusion These findings suggest that the protective effect of adipose reserves is frailty‐dependent in the oldest‐old, and that weight management strategies should consider baseline functional status.","PeriodicalId":186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.70358","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim Among the oldest‐old, the impact of body composition on survival outcomes exhibits pronounced heterogeneity. Although the obesity paradox has been widely discussed, clear evidence is still lacking regarding whether the biological effects of adipose reserves are modulated by functional status. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the association between adipose reserve indicators and long‐term all‐cause mortality risk in the oldest‐old and to elucidate the regulatory role of frailty, thereby providing an evidence‐based foundation for precision clinical health management. Methods This prospective cohort study included 529 community‐dwelling oldest‐old individuals. Participants were categorized into prefrailty and frailty groups at baseline using the Fried frailty phenotype. Bioelectrical impedance analysis was utilized to measure body composition. Stratified multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to evaluate the relationship between adipose indicators and all‐cause mortality. Additionally, restricted cubic splines (RCS) and Kaplan–Meier curves were used to analyse survival heterogeneity. Results During a median follow‐up of 3.84 years, 88 deaths (16.6%) occurred. In the prefrail oldest‐old, adipose reserves exhibited significant protective effects on survival: The fully adjusted model showed that PBF (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87–0.98, p = 0.006), VFA (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97–0.99, p = 0.013) and WHR (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86–0.95, p < 0.001) were all inversely associated with mortality risk. In contrast, these protective effects vanished in the frail oldest‐old (all p > 0.05), suggesting that the benefits of adipose tissue are contingent upon the individual's basal functional reserve. RCS analysis revealed a linear dose–response relationship between adipose indicators and mortality risk (all p for non‐linearity > 0.05), with no significant threshold effect observed. Interaction analyses confirmed that frailty status significantly modulated the prognostic value of adipose metrics ( p < 0.05), with protective effects restricted exclusively to prefrail individuals. Kaplan–Meier curves confirmed that individuals in the prefrailty stage with higher adipose reserves achieved the highest survival rates (all Log‐rank p < 0.001). Conclusion These findings suggest that the protective effect of adipose reserves is frailty‐dependent in the oldest‐old, and that weight management strategies should consider baseline functional status.
脂肪储备和生存:对体弱前期有保护作用,但对体弱的老年人无效
背景和目的在老年人中,身体组成对生存结果的影响表现出明显的异质性。尽管肥胖悖论已被广泛讨论,但关于脂肪储备的生物学效应是否受到功能状态的调节,仍然缺乏明确的证据。因此,本研究旨在探讨脂肪储备指标与老年人长期全因死亡风险之间的关系,并阐明虚弱的调节作用,从而为精确的临床健康管理提供证据基础。方法本前瞻性队列研究包括529名社区居住的老年人。在基线时使用Fried脆弱表型将参与者分为易感组和易感组。采用生物电阻抗分析法测定体成分。采用分层多变量Cox比例风险回归模型评估脂肪指标与全因死亡率之间的关系。此外,限制性三次样条(RCS)和Kaplan-Meier曲线用于分析生存异质性。结果在中位随访3.84年期间,发生88例死亡(16.6%)。在体弱的老年人中,脂肪储备对生存表现出显著的保护作用:完全调整模型显示PBF (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87-0.98, p = 0.006)、VFA (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99, p = 0.013)和WHR (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86-0.95, p < 0.001)均与死亡风险呈负相关。相反,这些保护作用在年老体弱的老年人中消失了(p > 0.05),这表明脂肪组织的益处取决于个体的基础功能储备。RCS分析显示,脂肪指标与死亡风险之间存在线性剂量-反应关系(非线性均为p >; 0.05),未观察到显著的阈值效应。相互作用分析证实,虚弱状态显著调节脂肪指标的预后价值(p < 0.05),保护作用仅限于虚弱前个体。Kaplan-Meier曲线证实,处于脂肪储备较高的初级阶段的个体获得了最高的存活率(所有Log‐rank p <; 0.001)。这些发现表明,脂肪储备的保护作用在老年人中依赖于虚弱,体重管理策略应考虑基线功能状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
自引率
12.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia, and Muscle is a prestigious, peer-reviewed international publication committed to disseminating research and clinical insights pertaining to cachexia, sarcopenia, body composition, and the physiological and pathophysiological alterations occurring throughout the lifespan and in various illnesses across the spectrum of life sciences. This journal serves as a valuable resource for physicians, biochemists, biologists, dieticians, pharmacologists, and students alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书