{"title":"Representational modelling as ensemble-plus-standing-for. A (weakly) pragmatist account","authors":"José Díez","doi":"10.1007/s13194-026-00759-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this paper is to present, justify and compare to its rivals an account of representational modelling as ensemble-plus-standing-for. The goal is to provide an analysis that is weak enough to be applied to the plethora of different models in empirical science, but strong enough to offer monistic and substantive answers to the problems of directionality, performance and adequacy of scientific representations. The account combines some inherentist and functional aspects adding some essential pragmatic components. In Sect. 1 I start with some introductory and terminological remarks, and the problems and desiderata the account aims to meet. In Sect. 2, I summarize the main features of inherentist and functional accounts, their virtues worth to preserve and their shortcomings to avoid. In Sect. 3 I present the account and how it answers the three problems. In Sect. 4, I assess the account vis a vis its rivals. In the final section I make some concluding remarks.","PeriodicalId":48832,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00759-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to present, justify and compare to its rivals an account of representational modelling as ensemble-plus-standing-for. The goal is to provide an analysis that is weak enough to be applied to the plethora of different models in empirical science, but strong enough to offer monistic and substantive answers to the problems of directionality, performance and adequacy of scientific representations. The account combines some inherentist and functional aspects adding some essential pragmatic components. In Sect. 1 I start with some introductory and terminological remarks, and the problems and desiderata the account aims to meet. In Sect. 2, I summarize the main features of inherentist and functional accounts, their virtues worth to preserve and their shortcomings to avoid. In Sect. 3 I present the account and how it answers the three problems. In Sect. 4, I assess the account vis a vis its rivals. In the final section I make some concluding remarks.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal for Philosophy of Science publishes groundbreaking works that can deepen understanding of the concepts and methods of the sciences, as they explore increasingly many facets of the world we live in. It is of direct interest to philosophers of science coming from different perspectives, as well as scientists, citizens and policymakers. The journal is interested in articles from all traditions and all backgrounds, as long as they engage with the sciences in a constructive, and critical, way. The journal represents the various longstanding European philosophical traditions engaging with the sciences, but welcomes articles from every part of the world.