Revisiting thoracic splanchnic nerve anatomy: implications for thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy and pain management.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Jordan Konstanty, Jessica L Morehouse, Ryan A Moon, Kathryn G Wolfe, Robert J Heins, Erica L Korbel, Jonathan Leo
{"title":"Revisiting thoracic splanchnic nerve anatomy: implications for thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy and pain management.","authors":"Jordan Konstanty, Jessica L Morehouse, Ryan A Moon, Kathryn G Wolfe, Robert J Heins, Erica L Korbel, Jonathan Leo","doi":"10.1007/s00276-026-03965-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The thoracic splanchnic nerves-greater (GSN), lesser (LSN), and least (lSN)-are important targets in thoracic surgery and image-guided interventions, yet detailed quantitative characterization of their anatomy remains limited. This study aimed to define the morphometry, segmental origins, and anatomical variability of these nerves to improve understanding of clinically relevant anatomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty sets of thoracic splanchnic nerves from 42 formalin-embalmed donors were dissected. Segmental contributions were recorded and classified, and morphometric measurements were obtained relative to the sympathetic trunk, transverse processes, midline, and aorta. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate differences in morphometric parameters by configuration, laterality, and sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GSN was present in 100% of specimens, the LSN in 93.75%, and the lSN in 28.75%. Substantial variability in segmental origin was observed. The most common GSN configuration was T6-T10 (42.5%), whereas the classically described T5-T9 pattern occurred in only 8.75% of cases. For the LSN, T11-T12 (34.67%) and T11 alone (29.33%) were the most common origins, while only 13.33% conformed to the traditionally described T10-T11 pattern. The lSN most commonly originated from T12 (78.26%). Statistically significant differences in nerve position and dimensions were identified with respect to laterality and sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thoracic splanchnic nerve anatomy is highly variable, and classically described segmental patterns represent a minority of cases. These findings provide clinically relevant morphometric data that may improve localization during thoracoscopic surgery, splanchnic nerve block, and other interventions involving the thoracic sympathetic system while reducing the risk of iatrogenic injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":49461,"journal":{"name":"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-026-03965-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The thoracic splanchnic nerves-greater (GSN), lesser (LSN), and least (lSN)-are important targets in thoracic surgery and image-guided interventions, yet detailed quantitative characterization of their anatomy remains limited. This study aimed to define the morphometry, segmental origins, and anatomical variability of these nerves to improve understanding of clinically relevant anatomy.

Methods: Eighty sets of thoracic splanchnic nerves from 42 formalin-embalmed donors were dissected. Segmental contributions were recorded and classified, and morphometric measurements were obtained relative to the sympathetic trunk, transverse processes, midline, and aorta. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate differences in morphometric parameters by configuration, laterality, and sex.

Results: The GSN was present in 100% of specimens, the LSN in 93.75%, and the lSN in 28.75%. Substantial variability in segmental origin was observed. The most common GSN configuration was T6-T10 (42.5%), whereas the classically described T5-T9 pattern occurred in only 8.75% of cases. For the LSN, T11-T12 (34.67%) and T11 alone (29.33%) were the most common origins, while only 13.33% conformed to the traditionally described T10-T11 pattern. The lSN most commonly originated from T12 (78.26%). Statistically significant differences in nerve position and dimensions were identified with respect to laterality and sex.

Conclusion: Thoracic splanchnic nerve anatomy is highly variable, and classically described segmental patterns represent a minority of cases. These findings provide clinically relevant morphometric data that may improve localization during thoracoscopic surgery, splanchnic nerve block, and other interventions involving the thoracic sympathetic system while reducing the risk of iatrogenic injury.

重述胸腔镜下胸椎内脏神经解剖:胸腔镜下内脏切除术和疼痛处理的意义。
目的:胸椎内脏神经——大神经(GSN)、小神经(LSN)和最小神经(LSN)——是胸外科手术和图像引导干预的重要靶点,但对其解剖结构的详细定量表征仍然有限。本研究旨在定义这些神经的形态、节段起源和解剖学变异性,以提高对临床相关解剖学的理解。方法:对42例经福尔马林防腐处理的供体80组胸椎内脏神经进行解剖。记录和分类节段贡献,并获得相对于交感干、横突、中线和主动脉的形态计量测量。进行统计分析,以评估形态计量参数的差异,通过配置,侧面,和性别。结果:GSN的发生率为100%,LSN的发生率为93.75%,LSN的发生率为28.75%。观察到节段起源的实质性变化。最常见的GSN结构是T6-T10(42.5%),而经典描述的T5-T9模式仅发生在8.75%的病例中。对于LSN来说,T11- t12(34.67%)和T11(29.33%)是最常见的起源,而只有13.33%符合传统描述的T10-T11模式。lSN最常发源于T12(78.26%)。在神经位置和尺寸方面的统计显著差异被确定相对于侧边和性别。结论:胸椎内脏神经解剖是高度可变的,经典描述的节段模式只代表少数病例。这些发现提供了临床相关的形态学数据,可以在胸腔镜手术、内脏神经阻滞和其他涉及胸交感神经系统的干预措施中改善定位,同时降低医源性损伤的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Anatomy is a morphological science which cannot fail to interest the clinician. The practical application of anatomical research to clinical problems necessitates special adaptation and selectivity in choosing from numerous international works. Although there is a tendency to believe that meaningful advances in anatomy are unlikely, constant revision is necessary. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, the first international journal of Clinical anatomy has been created in this spirit. Its goal is to serve clinicians, regardless of speciality-physicians, surgeons, radiologists or other specialists-as an indispensable aid with which they can improve their knowledge of anatomy. Each issue includes: Original papers, review articles, articles on the anatomical bases of medical, surgical and radiological techniques, articles of normal radiologic anatomy, brief reviews of anatomical publications of clinical interest. Particular attention is given to high quality illustrations, which are indispensable for a better understanding of anatomical problems. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy is a journal written by anatomists for clinicians with a special interest in anatomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书