Low versus high inferior mesenteric artery ligation and gastrointestinal quality of life following anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Q2 Medicine
Edin Hodžić, Amila Vinčević Hodžić, Timur Cerić, Zlatan Zvizdić, Amel Hadžimehmedagić
{"title":"Low versus high inferior mesenteric artery ligation and gastrointestinal quality of life following anterior resection for rectal cancer.","authors":"Edin Hodžić, Amila Vinčević Hodžić, Timur Cerić, Zlatan Zvizdić, Amel Hadžimehmedagić","doi":"10.17392/medglas-2182-23-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess whether the level of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) ligation independently affects gastrointestinal-specific quality of life after anterior resection for rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study including 125 patients with stage II-III mid- or upper- rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent open anterior resection with total mesorectal excision between 2020 and 2025 was conducted. Patients were classified according to the intraoperative level of IMA ligation as having either low ligation with preservation of the left colic artery (n = 75) or high ligation proximal to the origin of the left colic artery (n = 50). Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI; range 0-144) was assessed 6-8 weeks after protective stoma closure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GIQLI scores were significantly higher after low IMA ligation compared with high ligation (127.3 ± 5.7 versus 121.6 ± 5.7; p < 0.001). In univariable analysis, high IMA ligation was associated with lower GIQLI scores (B = -5.733; p < 0.001). In multivariable regression analysis excluding the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score, high IMA ligation remained independently associated with lower GIQLI scores (B = -5.016; p < 0.001). In exploratory receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, IMA ligation alone demonstrated moderate discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.689; 95% CI 0.595-0.783), while addition of IMA ligation to established predictors improved model discrimination (AUC=0.790; 95% CI 0.710-0.871).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low IMA ligation was associated with better postoperative gastrointestinal quality of life following anterior resection for rectal cancer. When oncologically appropriate, preservation of the left colic artery may optimise patient-reported outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51129,"journal":{"name":"Medicinski Glasnik","volume":"23 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicinski Glasnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17392/medglas-2182-23-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To assess whether the level of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) ligation independently affects gastrointestinal-specific quality of life after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Methods: A prospective cohort study including 125 patients with stage II-III mid- or upper- rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent open anterior resection with total mesorectal excision between 2020 and 2025 was conducted. Patients were classified according to the intraoperative level of IMA ligation as having either low ligation with preservation of the left colic artery (n = 75) or high ligation proximal to the origin of the left colic artery (n = 50). Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI; range 0-144) was assessed 6-8 weeks after protective stoma closure.

Results: GIQLI scores were significantly higher after low IMA ligation compared with high ligation (127.3 ± 5.7 versus 121.6 ± 5.7; p < 0.001). In univariable analysis, high IMA ligation was associated with lower GIQLI scores (B = -5.733; p < 0.001). In multivariable regression analysis excluding the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score, high IMA ligation remained independently associated with lower GIQLI scores (B = -5.016; p < 0.001). In exploratory receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, IMA ligation alone demonstrated moderate discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.689; 95% CI 0.595-0.783), while addition of IMA ligation to established predictors improved model discrimination (AUC=0.790; 95% CI 0.710-0.871).

Conclusion: Low IMA ligation was associated with better postoperative gastrointestinal quality of life following anterior resection for rectal cancer. When oncologically appropriate, preservation of the left colic artery may optimise patient-reported outcomes.

低位与高位肠系膜下动脉结扎对直肠癌前切除术后胃肠道生活质量的影响。
目的:评价肠系膜下动脉(IMA)结扎水平是否独立影响直肠癌前切除术后胃肠道特异性生活质量。方法:一项前瞻性队列研究包括125例II-III期直肠中或上段腺癌患者,他们在2020年至2025年期间接受了开放式前切除术并全肠系膜切除术。根据术中IMA结扎水平将患者分为保留左结肠动脉的低位结扎(n = 75)和靠近左结肠动脉起源的高位结扎(n = 50)。在保护性造口关闭后6-8周评估胃肠生活质量指数(GIQLI,范围0-144)。结果:低IMA结扎后的GIQLI评分明显高于高IMA结扎后的GIQLI评分(127.3±5.7比121.6±5.7;p < 0.001)。在单变量分析中,高IMA结扎与较低的GIQLI评分相关(B = -5.733; p < 0.001)。在排除低前切除术综合征(LARS)评分的多变量回归分析中,高IMA结扎仍然与较低的GIQLI评分独立相关(B = -5.016; p < 0.001)。在探索性受试者工作特征(ROC)分析中,IMA连接单独显示出中等的判别能力(AUC= 0.689; 95% CI 0.595-0.783),而IMA连接添加到已建立的预测因子中提高了模型判别能力(AUC=0.790; 95% CI 0.710-0.871)。结论:低IMA结扎与直肠癌前切除术后较好的胃肠道生活质量相关。当肿瘤适宜时,保留左结肠动脉可优化患者报告的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicinski Glasnik
Medicinski Glasnik 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicinski Glasnik (MG) is the official publication (two times per year) of the Medical Association of Zenica-Doboj Canton. Manuscripts that present of original basic and applied research from all fields of medicine (general and clinical practice, and basic medical sciences) are invited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书