Risk Stratification Models for Cutaneous Malignant Neoplasms After Blood or Marrow Transplant.

IF 10.9 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Kristy K Broman, Qingrui Meng, Joshua Richman, Lucy Zhou, Nora Balas, Wendy Landier, Lindsey Hageman, Alysia Bosworth, F Lennie Wong, Ravi Bhatia, Daniel J Weisdorf, Saro H Armenian, Smita Bhatia
{"title":"Risk Stratification Models for Cutaneous Malignant Neoplasms After Blood or Marrow Transplant.","authors":"Kristy K Broman, Qingrui Meng, Joshua Richman, Lucy Zhou, Nora Balas, Wendy Landier, Lindsey Hageman, Alysia Bosworth, F Lennie Wong, Ravi Bhatia, Daniel J Weisdorf, Saro H Armenian, Smita Bhatia","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.2763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Blood or marrow transplant (BMT) recipients are at increased risk of developing subsequent cutaneous malignant neoplasms. There is a need to develop risk stratification tools to identify those at highest risk to inform dermatologic surveillance and evaluate risk mitigation strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate a risk stratification tool for subsequent cutaneous malignant neoplasms among BMT recipients that incorporates readily available patient and treatment information.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This prognostic study included participants in the multi-institutional, longitudinal BMT Survivor Study (BMTSS), which included individuals who underwent autologous or allogeneic BMT from January 1, 1974, to December 31, 2014, at 1 of 3 participating sites in California, Minnesota, and Alabama and survived 2 or more years after BMT. The present cohort was restricted to individuals who underwent a single transplant and completed at least 1 BMTSS survey. Data were analyzed from December 3, 2024, to June 3, 2026.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Risk stratification models included the following candidate variables: age at BMT, sex, race, ethnicity, prior cutaneous malignant neoplasm, pretransplant exposure to monoclonal antibodies, total body irradiation, chronic graft vs host disease, and posttransplant immunosuppression.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main outcomes were incident basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), or melanoma after BMT, ascertained based on participant report with medical record validation when available. Models for risk stratification were developed and validated using time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve with repeated random partitioning into training and testing cohorts. Results were averaged to make a final model. Individuals were classified into low or high risk for subsequent cutaneous malignant neoplasm based on clinically meaningful risk stratification score thresholds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3448 included BMTSS participants (1917 [55.6%] male; mean [SD] age at BMT, 41.9 [19.2] years) who were alive without a cutaneous malignant neoplasm event 2 years after BMT, 282 (8.2%) were diagnosed with BCC, 183 (5.3%) with SCC, and 73 (2.1%) with melanoma. At 15 years after BMT, the test model AUCs were 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76-0.85) for BCC, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.86-0.93) for SCC, and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74-0.90) for melanoma. The 15-year cumulative incidence of BCC, SCC, and melanoma in the low-risk group was 2.4% (95% CI, 1.5%-3.9%), 3.2% (95% CI, 2.4%-4.2%), and 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.5%), respectively. In the high-risk group, the 15-year cumulative incidence of BCC, SCC, and melanoma was 13.3% (95% CI, 11.6%-15.4%), 13.6% (95% CI, 11.2%-16.5%), and 4.4% (95% CI, 3.2%-6.1%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this prognostic study, risk stratification models demonstrated excellent performance, highlighting potential utility for identifying BMT recipients who are at greatest risk of subsequent cutaneous malignant neoplasms.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"998-1005"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13470427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.2763","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Blood or marrow transplant (BMT) recipients are at increased risk of developing subsequent cutaneous malignant neoplasms. There is a need to develop risk stratification tools to identify those at highest risk to inform dermatologic surveillance and evaluate risk mitigation strategies.

Objective: To develop and validate a risk stratification tool for subsequent cutaneous malignant neoplasms among BMT recipients that incorporates readily available patient and treatment information.

Design, setting, and participants: This prognostic study included participants in the multi-institutional, longitudinal BMT Survivor Study (BMTSS), which included individuals who underwent autologous or allogeneic BMT from January 1, 1974, to December 31, 2014, at 1 of 3 participating sites in California, Minnesota, and Alabama and survived 2 or more years after BMT. The present cohort was restricted to individuals who underwent a single transplant and completed at least 1 BMTSS survey. Data were analyzed from December 3, 2024, to June 3, 2026.

Exposures: Risk stratification models included the following candidate variables: age at BMT, sex, race, ethnicity, prior cutaneous malignant neoplasm, pretransplant exposure to monoclonal antibodies, total body irradiation, chronic graft vs host disease, and posttransplant immunosuppression.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcomes were incident basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), or melanoma after BMT, ascertained based on participant report with medical record validation when available. Models for risk stratification were developed and validated using time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve with repeated random partitioning into training and testing cohorts. Results were averaged to make a final model. Individuals were classified into low or high risk for subsequent cutaneous malignant neoplasm based on clinically meaningful risk stratification score thresholds.

Results: Of the 3448 included BMTSS participants (1917 [55.6%] male; mean [SD] age at BMT, 41.9 [19.2] years) who were alive without a cutaneous malignant neoplasm event 2 years after BMT, 282 (8.2%) were diagnosed with BCC, 183 (5.3%) with SCC, and 73 (2.1%) with melanoma. At 15 years after BMT, the test model AUCs were 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76-0.85) for BCC, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.86-0.93) for SCC, and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74-0.90) for melanoma. The 15-year cumulative incidence of BCC, SCC, and melanoma in the low-risk group was 2.4% (95% CI, 1.5%-3.9%), 3.2% (95% CI, 2.4%-4.2%), and 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.5%), respectively. In the high-risk group, the 15-year cumulative incidence of BCC, SCC, and melanoma was 13.3% (95% CI, 11.6%-15.4%), 13.6% (95% CI, 11.2%-16.5%), and 4.4% (95% CI, 3.2%-6.1%), respectively.

Conclusions and relevance: In this prognostic study, risk stratification models demonstrated excellent performance, highlighting potential utility for identifying BMT recipients who are at greatest risk of subsequent cutaneous malignant neoplasms.

血液或骨髓移植后皮肤恶性肿瘤的风险分层模型。
重要性:血液或骨髓移植(BMT)受者发生后续皮肤恶性肿瘤的风险增加。有必要开发风险分层工具,以确定风险最高的人群,为皮肤病监测提供信息,并评估风险缓解战略。目的:开发和验证一种风险分层工具,用于BMT受者随后的皮肤恶性肿瘤,该工具包含了现成的患者和治疗信息。设计、环境和参与者:本预后研究纳入了多机构、纵向BMT幸存者研究(BMTSS)的参与者,其中包括1974年1月1日至2014年12月31日在加利福尼亚州、明尼苏达州和阿拉巴马州3个参与地点中的1个接受自体或异体BMT的个体,并在BMT后存活2年或更长时间。目前的队列仅限于接受单一移植并完成至少1次BMTSS调查的个体。数据分析时间为2024年12月3日至2026年6月3日。暴露:风险分层模型包括以下候选变量:BMT时的年龄、性别、种族、民族、既往皮肤恶性肿瘤、移植前单克隆抗体暴露、全身照射、慢性移植物对宿主病和移植后免疫抑制。主要结局和指标:主要结局是BMT后基底细胞癌(BCC)、鳞状细胞癌(SCC)或黑色素瘤的发生率,根据参与者报告和医疗记录验证确定。建立风险分层模型,并使用受试者工作特征(AUC)曲线下的时间依赖面积进行验证,并重复随机划分为训练和测试队列。将结果取平均值,形成最终模型。根据临床有意义的风险分层评分阈值,将个体分为皮肤恶性肿瘤的低风险或高风险。结果:在BMTSS纳入的3448名参与者中(1917名[55.6%]男性;BMT时的平均[SD]年龄为41.9[19.2]岁),BMT后2年未发生皮肤恶性肿瘤事件,282名(8.2%)被诊断为BCC, 183名(5.3%)被诊断为SCC, 73名(2.1%)被诊断为黑色素瘤。在BMT后15年,BCC的测试模型auc为0.81 (95% CI, 0.76-0.85), SCC为0.90 (95% CI, 0.86-0.93),黑色素瘤为0.83 (95% CI, 0.74-0.90)。低危组BCC、SCC和黑色素瘤的15年累积发病率分别为2.4% (95% CI, 1.5%-3.9%)、3.2% (95% CI, 2.4%-4.2%)和0.8% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.5%)。在高危组中,BCC、SCC和黑色素瘤的15年累积发病率分别为13.3% (95% CI, 11.6%-15.4%)、13.6% (95% CI, 11.2%-16.5%)和4.4% (95% CI, 3.2%-6.1%)。结论和相关性:在这项预后研究中,风险分层模型表现出优异的性能,突出了识别后续皮肤恶性肿瘤风险最大的BMT受者的潜在效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA dermatology
JAMA dermatology DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
5.50%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: JAMA Dermatology is an international peer-reviewed journal that has been in continuous publication since 1882. It began publication by the American Medical Association in 1920 as Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology. The journal publishes material that helps in the development and testing of the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment in medical and surgical dermatology, pediatric and geriatric dermatology, and oncologic and aesthetic dermatologic surgery. JAMA Dermatology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. It is published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues a year. The mission of the journal is to elevate the art and science of health and diseases of skin, hair, nails, and mucous membranes, and their treatment, with the aim of enabling dermatologists to deliver evidence-based, high-value medical and surgical dermatologic care. The journal publishes a broad range of innovative studies and trials that shift research and clinical practice paradigms, expand the understanding of the burden of dermatologic diseases and key outcomes, improve the practice of dermatology, and ensure equitable care to all patients. It also features research and opinion examining ethical, moral, socioeconomic, educational, and political issues relevant to dermatologists, aiming to enable ongoing improvement to the workforce, scope of practice, and the training of future dermatologists. JAMA Dermatology aims to be a leader in developing initiatives to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion within the specialty and within dermatology medical publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书