Kristy K Broman, Qingrui Meng, Joshua Richman, Lucy Zhou, Nora Balas, Wendy Landier, Lindsey Hageman, Alysia Bosworth, F Lennie Wong, Ravi Bhatia, Daniel J Weisdorf, Saro H Armenian, Smita Bhatia
{"title":"Risk Stratification Models for Cutaneous Malignant Neoplasms After Blood or Marrow Transplant.","authors":"Kristy K Broman, Qingrui Meng, Joshua Richman, Lucy Zhou, Nora Balas, Wendy Landier, Lindsey Hageman, Alysia Bosworth, F Lennie Wong, Ravi Bhatia, Daniel J Weisdorf, Saro H Armenian, Smita Bhatia","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.2763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Blood or marrow transplant (BMT) recipients are at increased risk of developing subsequent cutaneous malignant neoplasms. There is a need to develop risk stratification tools to identify those at highest risk to inform dermatologic surveillance and evaluate risk mitigation strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate a risk stratification tool for subsequent cutaneous malignant neoplasms among BMT recipients that incorporates readily available patient and treatment information.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This prognostic study included participants in the multi-institutional, longitudinal BMT Survivor Study (BMTSS), which included individuals who underwent autologous or allogeneic BMT from January 1, 1974, to December 31, 2014, at 1 of 3 participating sites in California, Minnesota, and Alabama and survived 2 or more years after BMT. The present cohort was restricted to individuals who underwent a single transplant and completed at least 1 BMTSS survey. Data were analyzed from December 3, 2024, to June 3, 2026.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Risk stratification models included the following candidate variables: age at BMT, sex, race, ethnicity, prior cutaneous malignant neoplasm, pretransplant exposure to monoclonal antibodies, total body irradiation, chronic graft vs host disease, and posttransplant immunosuppression.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main outcomes were incident basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), or melanoma after BMT, ascertained based on participant report with medical record validation when available. Models for risk stratification were developed and validated using time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve with repeated random partitioning into training and testing cohorts. Results were averaged to make a final model. Individuals were classified into low or high risk for subsequent cutaneous malignant neoplasm based on clinically meaningful risk stratification score thresholds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3448 included BMTSS participants (1917 [55.6%] male; mean [SD] age at BMT, 41.9 [19.2] years) who were alive without a cutaneous malignant neoplasm event 2 years after BMT, 282 (8.2%) were diagnosed with BCC, 183 (5.3%) with SCC, and 73 (2.1%) with melanoma. At 15 years after BMT, the test model AUCs were 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76-0.85) for BCC, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.86-0.93) for SCC, and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74-0.90) for melanoma. The 15-year cumulative incidence of BCC, SCC, and melanoma in the low-risk group was 2.4% (95% CI, 1.5%-3.9%), 3.2% (95% CI, 2.4%-4.2%), and 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.5%), respectively. In the high-risk group, the 15-year cumulative incidence of BCC, SCC, and melanoma was 13.3% (95% CI, 11.6%-15.4%), 13.6% (95% CI, 11.2%-16.5%), and 4.4% (95% CI, 3.2%-6.1%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this prognostic study, risk stratification models demonstrated excellent performance, highlighting potential utility for identifying BMT recipients who are at greatest risk of subsequent cutaneous malignant neoplasms.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"998-1005"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13470427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.2763","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Importance: Blood or marrow transplant (BMT) recipients are at increased risk of developing subsequent cutaneous malignant neoplasms. There is a need to develop risk stratification tools to identify those at highest risk to inform dermatologic surveillance and evaluate risk mitigation strategies.
Objective: To develop and validate a risk stratification tool for subsequent cutaneous malignant neoplasms among BMT recipients that incorporates readily available patient and treatment information.
Design, setting, and participants: This prognostic study included participants in the multi-institutional, longitudinal BMT Survivor Study (BMTSS), which included individuals who underwent autologous or allogeneic BMT from January 1, 1974, to December 31, 2014, at 1 of 3 participating sites in California, Minnesota, and Alabama and survived 2 or more years after BMT. The present cohort was restricted to individuals who underwent a single transplant and completed at least 1 BMTSS survey. Data were analyzed from December 3, 2024, to June 3, 2026.
Exposures: Risk stratification models included the following candidate variables: age at BMT, sex, race, ethnicity, prior cutaneous malignant neoplasm, pretransplant exposure to monoclonal antibodies, total body irradiation, chronic graft vs host disease, and posttransplant immunosuppression.
Main outcomes and measures: The main outcomes were incident basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), or melanoma after BMT, ascertained based on participant report with medical record validation when available. Models for risk stratification were developed and validated using time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve with repeated random partitioning into training and testing cohorts. Results were averaged to make a final model. Individuals were classified into low or high risk for subsequent cutaneous malignant neoplasm based on clinically meaningful risk stratification score thresholds.
Results: Of the 3448 included BMTSS participants (1917 [55.6%] male; mean [SD] age at BMT, 41.9 [19.2] years) who were alive without a cutaneous malignant neoplasm event 2 years after BMT, 282 (8.2%) were diagnosed with BCC, 183 (5.3%) with SCC, and 73 (2.1%) with melanoma. At 15 years after BMT, the test model AUCs were 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76-0.85) for BCC, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.86-0.93) for SCC, and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74-0.90) for melanoma. The 15-year cumulative incidence of BCC, SCC, and melanoma in the low-risk group was 2.4% (95% CI, 1.5%-3.9%), 3.2% (95% CI, 2.4%-4.2%), and 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.5%), respectively. In the high-risk group, the 15-year cumulative incidence of BCC, SCC, and melanoma was 13.3% (95% CI, 11.6%-15.4%), 13.6% (95% CI, 11.2%-16.5%), and 4.4% (95% CI, 3.2%-6.1%), respectively.
Conclusions and relevance: In this prognostic study, risk stratification models demonstrated excellent performance, highlighting potential utility for identifying BMT recipients who are at greatest risk of subsequent cutaneous malignant neoplasms.
期刊介绍:
JAMA Dermatology is an international peer-reviewed journal that has been in continuous publication since 1882. It began publication by the American Medical Association in 1920 as Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology. The journal publishes material that helps in the development and testing of the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment in medical and surgical dermatology, pediatric and geriatric dermatology, and oncologic and aesthetic dermatologic surgery.
JAMA Dermatology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. It is published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues a year. The mission of the journal is to elevate the art and science of health and diseases of skin, hair, nails, and mucous membranes, and their treatment, with the aim of enabling dermatologists to deliver evidence-based, high-value medical and surgical dermatologic care.
The journal publishes a broad range of innovative studies and trials that shift research and clinical practice paradigms, expand the understanding of the burden of dermatologic diseases and key outcomes, improve the practice of dermatology, and ensure equitable care to all patients. It also features research and opinion examining ethical, moral, socioeconomic, educational, and political issues relevant to dermatologists, aiming to enable ongoing improvement to the workforce, scope of practice, and the training of future dermatologists.
JAMA Dermatology aims to be a leader in developing initiatives to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion within the specialty and within dermatology medical publishing.