Maintenance therapy after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for relapse prevention in myeloid malignancies.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Current Opinion in Hematology Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-13 DOI:10.1097/MOH.0000000000000948
Nihar Desai, Ivan Pasic
{"title":"Maintenance therapy after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for relapse prevention in myeloid malignancies.","authors":"Nihar Desai, Ivan Pasic","doi":"10.1097/MOH.0000000000000948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Relapse remains the leading cause of treatment failure after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and outcomes after relapse are poor. This review summarizes and critically appraises current evidence for post-HCT maintenance therapy aimed at relapse prevention.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Patient selection increasingly rests on disease risk and the presence of a targetable mutation. FLT3 inhibitors carry the strongest evidence: randomized trials support sorafenib and gilteritinib in FLT3 internal tandem duplication ( FLT3-ITD ) AML, and the MORPHO trial showed that measurable residual disease (MRD) status identifies patients most likely to benefit. Isocitrate dehydrogenase ( IDH ) inhibitors and menin inhibitors are promising but lack randomized data. For patients without actionable mutations, hypomethylating agent maintenance has produced inconsistent results, and the evidence more strongly supports MRD-triggered preemptive therapy.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Post-HCT maintenance has shifted from broadly applied, poorly tolerated regimens toward targeted, MRD-guided strategies. Important uncertainties remain regarding optimal patient selection, agent choice, timing, and duration. Adequately powered, HCT-specific randomized trials with standardized MRD endpoints are the principal unmet need.</p>","PeriodicalId":55196,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"229-235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOH.0000000000000948","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Relapse remains the leading cause of treatment failure after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and outcomes after relapse are poor. This review summarizes and critically appraises current evidence for post-HCT maintenance therapy aimed at relapse prevention.

Recent findings: Patient selection increasingly rests on disease risk and the presence of a targetable mutation. FLT3 inhibitors carry the strongest evidence: randomized trials support sorafenib and gilteritinib in FLT3 internal tandem duplication ( FLT3-ITD ) AML, and the MORPHO trial showed that measurable residual disease (MRD) status identifies patients most likely to benefit. Isocitrate dehydrogenase ( IDH ) inhibitors and menin inhibitors are promising but lack randomized data. For patients without actionable mutations, hypomethylating agent maintenance has produced inconsistent results, and the evidence more strongly supports MRD-triggered preemptive therapy.

Summary: Post-HCT maintenance has shifted from broadly applied, poorly tolerated regimens toward targeted, MRD-guided strategies. Important uncertainties remain regarding optimal patient selection, agent choice, timing, and duration. Adequately powered, HCT-specific randomized trials with standardized MRD endpoints are the principal unmet need.

同种异体干细胞移植后维持治疗预防髓系恶性肿瘤复发。
回顾目的:复发仍然是同种异体造血细胞移植(HCT)治疗急性髓系白血病(AML)和骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)后治疗失败的主要原因,复发后的预后较差。这篇综述总结并批判性地评价了旨在预防复发的hct后维持治疗的现有证据。最近的研究发现:患者的选择越来越依赖于疾病风险和可靶向突变的存在。FLT3抑制剂提供了最有力的证据:随机试验支持索拉非尼和吉特替尼治疗FLT3内部串联重复(FLT3- itd) AML, MORPHO试验表明,可测量的残留疾病(MRD)状态可识别最有可能受益的患者。异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)抑制剂和menin抑制剂是有希望的,但缺乏随机数据。对于没有可操作突变的患者,低甲基化药物维持产生了不一致的结果,证据更有力地支持mrd触发的先发制人治疗。摘要:hct后的维持已经从广泛应用的、耐受性差的方案转向有针对性的、mrd指导的策略。重要的不确定性仍然存在于最佳患者选择,药物选择,时间和持续时间。具有标准化MRD终点的hct特异性随机试验是主要的未满足需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Hematology is an easy-to-digest bimonthly journal covering the most interesting and important advances in the field of hematology. Its hand-picked selection of editors ensure the highest quality selection of unbiased review articles on themes from nine key subject areas, including myeloid biology, Vascular biology, hematopoiesis and erythroid system and its diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书