Functional Limitations Reported Among U.S. Adults With Intellectual Disability Participating in Special Olympics: A Comparative Analysis to the General Population.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Alicia M Dixon-Ibarra, John P Hanley, Andrew E Lincoln, Julie D Weeks, Jon Baio, Joseph Holbrook, Catherine E Rice
{"title":"Functional Limitations Reported Among U.S. Adults With Intellectual Disability Participating in Special Olympics: A Comparative Analysis to the General Population.","authors":"Alicia M Dixon-Ibarra, John P Hanley, Andrew E Lincoln, Julie D Weeks, Jon Baio, Joseph Holbrook, Catherine E Rice","doi":"10.1080/19447515.2026.2669460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Washington Group Short Set on Functioning (WG-SS) allows for the identification of functional limitations across severity levels. Incorporating the WG-SS into Special Olympics (SO) surveys serves to understand functional support needs and inform SO programming for people with intellectual disability. This study examined functioning using both a restrictive and a broad definition of limitation among 525 U.S. SO athletes who completed an online survey in 2022. Self- and proxy-reported outcomes were compared to National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) estimates. Nearly a quarter of SO athletes (24.2%) reported any functional limitation under the restricted definition, while over three quarters (82.1%) reported limitations under the broad definition. Differences emerged between self- and proxy-reported data. Compared with NHIS age-adjusted estimates, SO athletes had higher prevalence ratios across all six domains, including self-care (PR = 12.93) and communication (PR = 11.21). These findings underscore functional diversity among SO athletes and inform programming and disability surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":51508,"journal":{"name":"Ajidd-American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","volume":"131 4","pages":"251-266"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13531350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ajidd-American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19447515.2026.2669460","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Washington Group Short Set on Functioning (WG-SS) allows for the identification of functional limitations across severity levels. Incorporating the WG-SS into Special Olympics (SO) surveys serves to understand functional support needs and inform SO programming for people with intellectual disability. This study examined functioning using both a restrictive and a broad definition of limitation among 525 U.S. SO athletes who completed an online survey in 2022. Self- and proxy-reported outcomes were compared to National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) estimates. Nearly a quarter of SO athletes (24.2%) reported any functional limitation under the restricted definition, while over three quarters (82.1%) reported limitations under the broad definition. Differences emerged between self- and proxy-reported data. Compared with NHIS age-adjusted estimates, SO athletes had higher prevalence ratios across all six domains, including self-care (PR = 12.93) and communication (PR = 11.21). These findings underscore functional diversity among SO athletes and inform programming and disability surveillance.

美国智力残疾成人参加特奥会的功能限制报告:与普通人群的比较分析。
华盛顿小组功能短集(WG-SS)允许识别不同严重程度的功能限制。将WG-SS纳入特奥会调查有助于了解功能支持需求,并为智障人士的特奥会规划提供信息。本研究在美国525个国家中使用了限制性和广义的限制定义来检查功能这些运动员在2022年完成了一项在线调查。将自我报告和代理报告的结果与国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)的估计结果进行比较。近四分之一(24.2%)的SO运动员报告了限制性定义下的功能限制,而超过四分之三(82.1%)的运动员报告了广义定义下的功能限制。自我报告和代理报告的数据之间出现了差异。与NHIS年龄调整后的估计值相比,SO运动员在所有六个领域的患病率都更高,包括自我护理(PR = 12.93)和沟通(PR = 11.21)。这些发现强调了SO运动员的功能多样性,并为规划和残疾监测提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (Print ISSN: 1944–7515; Online ISSN: 1944–7558) is published by the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. It is a scientifi c, scholarly, and archival multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions of the highest quality to knowledge of intellectual disabilities, its causes, treatment, and prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书