Gastrointestinal Symptom-Specific Anxiety Predicts Positive SCOFF Screens in Adults With Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome and Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder and May Overestimate Eating Disorder Risk.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Reem Altuwayjiri, Lee David Martin, Natalia Zarate-Lopez, Chiara Vari, Rabia Topan, Qasim Aziz, Asma Fikree
{"title":"Gastrointestinal Symptom-Specific Anxiety Predicts Positive SCOFF Screens in Adults With Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome and Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder and May Overestimate Eating Disorder Risk.","authors":"Reem Altuwayjiri, Lee David Martin, Natalia Zarate-Lopez, Chiara Vari, Rabia Topan, Qasim Aziz, Asma Fikree","doi":"10.1111/nmo.70417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>The Sick, Control, One, Fat, Food (SCOFF) is a questionnaire that screens for risk of eating disorders. Some symptoms and psychological factors associated with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) may resemble the features of eating disorders, potentially overestimating the risk of eating disorders in populations with high DGBI prevalence such as those with Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome/hypermobility spectrum disorder (hEDS/HSD). This study aimed to identify factors associated with screening positive on SCOFF among adult with hEDS/HSD to explore the questionnaire's suitability for this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary analysis of data from 670 adults with hEDS/HSD recruited from Ehlers-Danlos Support UK and tertiary Neurogastroenterology. χ<sup>2</sup> tests and logistic regression were used to examine factors associated with positive SCOFF screening result and positive responses to individual SCOFF questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DGBI presence did not predict a positive SCOFF screen. However, high gastrointestinal symptom-specific anxiety (GSA) (AOR: 3.19, p < 0.001), fear of aversive consequences from eating (AOR: 1.97, p = 0.013), and anxiety (AOR = 2.53, p < 0.001) were significant predictors. Notably, high GSA strongly predicted a positive response to questions two (Do you worry you have lost Control over how much you eat?) and five (Would you say that Food dominates your life?) (Q2 AOR = 2.58, p = 0.006, Q5 AOR = 5.98, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In hEDS/HSD, high GSA strongly predicted a positive SCOFF screening outcome, suggesting that SCOFF's questions might detect behaviors associated with worries around GI symptoms rather than an eating disorder. Positive screens in this population should be interpreted with caution and accompanied by GSA-focused assessments to enhance biopsychosocial management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":"38 8","pages":"e70417"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13469731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70417","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: The Sick, Control, One, Fat, Food (SCOFF) is a questionnaire that screens for risk of eating disorders. Some symptoms and psychological factors associated with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) may resemble the features of eating disorders, potentially overestimating the risk of eating disorders in populations with high DGBI prevalence such as those with Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome/hypermobility spectrum disorder (hEDS/HSD). This study aimed to identify factors associated with screening positive on SCOFF among adult with hEDS/HSD to explore the questionnaire's suitability for this population.

Methods: A secondary analysis of data from 670 adults with hEDS/HSD recruited from Ehlers-Danlos Support UK and tertiary Neurogastroenterology. χ2 tests and logistic regression were used to examine factors associated with positive SCOFF screening result and positive responses to individual SCOFF questions.

Results: DGBI presence did not predict a positive SCOFF screen. However, high gastrointestinal symptom-specific anxiety (GSA) (AOR: 3.19, p < 0.001), fear of aversive consequences from eating (AOR: 1.97, p = 0.013), and anxiety (AOR = 2.53, p < 0.001) were significant predictors. Notably, high GSA strongly predicted a positive response to questions two (Do you worry you have lost Control over how much you eat?) and five (Would you say that Food dominates your life?) (Q2 AOR = 2.58, p = 0.006, Q5 AOR = 5.98, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: In hEDS/HSD, high GSA strongly predicted a positive SCOFF screening outcome, suggesting that SCOFF's questions might detect behaviors associated with worries around GI symptoms rather than an eating disorder. Positive screens in this population should be interpreted with caution and accompanied by GSA-focused assessments to enhance biopsychosocial management.

胃肠道症状特异性焦虑预测患有多动性埃勒-丹洛斯综合征和多动性谱系障碍的成人SCOFF筛查阳性,并可能高估饮食障碍风险。
背景/目的:病态、控制、一、脂肪、食物(SCOFF)是一份调查问卷,用于筛查饮食失调的风险。与肠-脑相互作用障碍(DGBI)相关的一些症状和心理因素可能类似于饮食失调的特征,这可能高估了DGBI高患病率人群中饮食失调的风险,例如那些患有超动ehers - danlos综合征/超动谱系障碍(hEDS/HSD)的人群。本研究旨在确定与成人hEDS/HSD患者SCOFF筛查阳性相关的因素,以探讨该问卷对该人群的适用性。方法:对来自ehers - danlos Support UK和三级神经胃肠病学的670名成人hEDS/HSD患者的数据进行二次分析。采用χ2检验和logistic回归检验SCOFF筛查阳性结果和SCOFF单项问题阳性回答的相关因素。结果:DGBI的存在不能预测SCOFF筛查阳性。然而,高胃肠道症状特异性焦虑(GSA) (AOR: 3.19, p)结论:在hEDS/HSD中,高GSA强烈预测SCOFF筛查结果阳性,表明SCOFF问题可能检测出与胃肠道症状担忧相关的行为,而不是饮食失调。该人群的阳性筛查结果应谨慎解读,并辅以以gsa为重点的评估,以加强生物心理社会管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书