Intramuscular tranexamic acid results in lower peak plasma concentrations but comparable systemic absorption to intravenous administration in healthy dogs.
Eun Ji Kwak, Kristin Zersen, Claire Tucker, Casey Lavender, Charles Talbot, Daniel Gustafson, Tara Hendry-Hofer, Kelly Hall
{"title":"Intramuscular tranexamic acid results in lower peak plasma concentrations but comparable systemic absorption to intravenous administration in healthy dogs.","authors":"Eun Ji Kwak, Kristin Zersen, Claire Tucker, Casey Lavender, Charles Talbot, Daniel Gustafson, Tara Hendry-Hofer, Kelly Hall","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.26.06.0266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the pharmacokinetics of IM and IV tranexamic acid (TXA) in healthy dogs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were 6 healthy client-owned dogs that received TXA (20 mg/kg) in a randomized crossover study design with a 6-week washout period between IM and IV administration. Venous blood samples were collected from baseline to 8 hours after injection. Plasma TXA concentrations were measured using LC-MS-MS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For IM administration, mean ± SD maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was 46.8 ± 26.6 μg/mL, total area under the curve was 173.8 ± 25.0 μg/mL·h, time to Cmax was 1.6 ± 1.4 hours, half-life (t1/2) was 2.8 ± 2.1 hours, and bioavailability was 120.9 ± 10.0%. For IV administration, Cmax was 119.8 ± 17.6 μg/mL, total area under the curve was 143.3 ± 10.5 μg/mL·h, and t1/2 was 2.1 ± 1.8 hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IM Cmax reached approximately 39% of IV Cmax and exhibited a 33% longer t1/2, consistent with slower absorption. Despite the lower Cmax, bioavailability was 120.9%, suggesting that IM TXA maintained a higher plasma concentration for a longer duration.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Although the prolonged time to Cmax associated with IM administration may limit its use in patients requiring rapid intervention, it offers practical advantages when IV access is delayed, allowing prehospital treatment prior to definitive veterinary care. Further investigation into IM dosing protocols is needed before it can be recommended in clinical patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.26.06.0266","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To determine the pharmacokinetics of IM and IV tranexamic acid (TXA) in healthy dogs.
Methods: There were 6 healthy client-owned dogs that received TXA (20 mg/kg) in a randomized crossover study design with a 6-week washout period between IM and IV administration. Venous blood samples were collected from baseline to 8 hours after injection. Plasma TXA concentrations were measured using LC-MS-MS.
Results: For IM administration, mean ± SD maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was 46.8 ± 26.6 μg/mL, total area under the curve was 173.8 ± 25.0 μg/mL·h, time to Cmax was 1.6 ± 1.4 hours, half-life (t1/2) was 2.8 ± 2.1 hours, and bioavailability was 120.9 ± 10.0%. For IV administration, Cmax was 119.8 ± 17.6 μg/mL, total area under the curve was 143.3 ± 10.5 μg/mL·h, and t1/2 was 2.1 ± 1.8 hours.
Conclusions: IM Cmax reached approximately 39% of IV Cmax and exhibited a 33% longer t1/2, consistent with slower absorption. Despite the lower Cmax, bioavailability was 120.9%, suggesting that IM TXA maintained a higher plasma concentration for a longer duration.
Clinical relevance: Although the prolonged time to Cmax associated with IM administration may limit its use in patients requiring rapid intervention, it offers practical advantages when IV access is delayed, allowing prehospital treatment prior to definitive veterinary care. Further investigation into IM dosing protocols is needed before it can be recommended in clinical patients.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.