Not all cues are equal: A systematic review and three-level meta-analysis of context consistency, physical activity and habit strength.

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Lianghao Zhu, Yingying Tao, Bojun Zhou, Haoming Ma, Navin Kaushal, Xinyi Ma, Yi Guo, Rui Zhao, Solomon B Oguntuase, Hui Li, Liancheng Zhang
{"title":"Not all cues are equal: A systematic review and three-level meta-analysis of context consistency, physical activity and habit strength.","authors":"Lianghao Zhu, Yingying Tao, Bojun Zhou, Haoming Ma, Navin Kaushal, Xinyi Ma, Yi Guo, Rui Zhao, Solomon B Oguntuase, Hui Li, Liancheng Zhang","doi":"10.1111/aphw.70204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although models on habit formation identify the importance of contextual cues as a prerequisite for physical activity (PA) habit formation, no quantitative synthesis has yet established which cue dimensions matter most for habit strength and PA behaviour. This study primarily examined the relationships of context consistency with PA behaviour and PA habit strength, compared effect sizes across five cue dimensions and explored potential moderators. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, including a search of six electronic databases. A three level random effects model was employed to account for effect size dependency. A total of 14 independent studies involving 6069 participants were integrated. Context consistency was significantly correlated with both PA behaviour (r = 0.11) and PA habit strength (r = 0.20). Although effect sizes were small, they are consistent with population-level benchmarks in the PA literature. Only temporal consistency and routine consistency were significantly correlated with PA behaviour; consistency of temporal, social, location, routine and mood cues showed significant positive associations with PA habit strength; no studies examined associations involving object cues. PA operationalisation (frequency vs. duration) moderated the consistency-behaviour relationship, with stronger effects when PA was operationalised as frequency rather than duration. Additionally, PA habit strength was found to be significantly positively correlated with PA behaviour, with a medium-to-large effect size. These findings indicate that cue dimensions differentially relate to PA outcomes, with temporal and routine cues emerging as key targets for behaviour-focused interventions, supporting a shift toward cue-specific PA promotion strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8127,"journal":{"name":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","volume":"18 4","pages":"e70204"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13467471/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.70204","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although models on habit formation identify the importance of contextual cues as a prerequisite for physical activity (PA) habit formation, no quantitative synthesis has yet established which cue dimensions matter most for habit strength and PA behaviour. This study primarily examined the relationships of context consistency with PA behaviour and PA habit strength, compared effect sizes across five cue dimensions and explored potential moderators. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, including a search of six electronic databases. A three level random effects model was employed to account for effect size dependency. A total of 14 independent studies involving 6069 participants were integrated. Context consistency was significantly correlated with both PA behaviour (r = 0.11) and PA habit strength (r = 0.20). Although effect sizes were small, they are consistent with population-level benchmarks in the PA literature. Only temporal consistency and routine consistency were significantly correlated with PA behaviour; consistency of temporal, social, location, routine and mood cues showed significant positive associations with PA habit strength; no studies examined associations involving object cues. PA operationalisation (frequency vs. duration) moderated the consistency-behaviour relationship, with stronger effects when PA was operationalised as frequency rather than duration. Additionally, PA habit strength was found to be significantly positively correlated with PA behaviour, with a medium-to-large effect size. These findings indicate that cue dimensions differentially relate to PA outcomes, with temporal and routine cues emerging as key targets for behaviour-focused interventions, supporting a shift toward cue-specific PA promotion strategies.

并不是所有的线索都是一样的:一项关于环境一致性、身体活动和习惯强度的系统回顾和三层次元分析。
尽管习惯形成的模型确定了情境线索作为体育活动习惯形成的先决条件的重要性,但目前还没有定量综合确定哪种线索维度对习惯强度和体育活动行为最重要。本研究主要考察了情境一致性与PA行为和PA习惯强度的关系,比较了五个线索维度的效应大小,并探索了潜在的调节因素。进行了系统综述和荟萃分析,包括对六个电子数据库的检索。采用三水平随机效应模型来解释效应大小依赖性。共纳入14项独立研究,涉及6069名受试者。情境一致性与PA行为(r = 0.11)和PA习惯强度(r = 0.20)均显著相关。虽然效应量很小,但它们与PA文献中的人群水平基准一致。只有时间一致性和日常一致性与PA行为显著相关;时间、社交、地点、日常和情绪线索的一致性与PA习惯强度呈显著正相关;没有研究检查涉及物体线索的关联。PA操作化(频率vs持续时间)调节了一致性-行为关系,当PA操作化为频率而不是持续时间时,效果更强。此外,PA习惯强度与PA行为显著正相关,具有中大型效应量。这些发现表明,线索维度与行为干预的结果存在差异,时间线索和常规线索成为以行为为中心的干预的关键目标,支持向线索特异性行为促进策略的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being is a triannual peer-reviewed academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the International Association of Applied Psychology. It was established in 2009 and covers applied psychology topics such as clinical psychology, counseling, cross-cultural psychology, and environmental psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书