Natural Antioxidant Activity Evaluation Using Electrochemically Generated Superoxide Radical Anion: The SRAGE Assay.

IF 3 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-12 DOI:10.1007/s12013-026-02130-z
Fatah Keffous, Abdallah Habab, Mohamed Abbaci, Abdelkrim Cheriti
{"title":"Natural Antioxidant Activity Evaluation Using Electrochemically Generated Superoxide Radical Anion: The SRAGE Assay.","authors":"Fatah Keffous, Abdallah Habab, Mohamed Abbaci, Abdelkrim Cheriti","doi":"10.1007/s12013-026-02130-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The antioxidant concentration and the redox potential of the oxidizing system employed in antioxidant assays are critical parameters governing the classification of antioxidant reducing power. In this study, we introduce the Superoxide Radical Anion Generated Electrochemically (SRAGE) assay, a novel electrochemical method for evaluating the antioxidant activity of natural compounds. Superoxide is the primary reactive oxygen species generated during the one-electron reduction of molecular oxygen in mitochondria, making it a biologically relevant probe for antioxidant evaluation and a distinct advantage over conventional 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2'-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) discoloration methods.In the SRAGE assay, [Formula: see text]is generated in situ by electrochemical reduction and subsequently scavenged by natural antioxidants, including rutin, ascorbic acid, quercetin, and gallic acid. The controlled generation of superoxide was achieved using cyclic voltammetry and was validated experimentally. At a concentration of 1mmol L- 1, the tested antioxidants exhibited inhibitory activities of 44.30 ± 1.31%, 52.01 ± 0.95%, 78.73 ± 2.02%, and 100.0 ± 0.12%, respectively. The ranking of antioxidant reducing power obtained from the SRAGE assay is in close agreement with that derived from the DPPH method. The proposed SRAGE assay offers a versatile electrochemical platform for evaluating the antioxidant activity of pure compounds and complex systems, including synthetic formulations, biological extracts, pharmaceutical products, and food additives.</p>","PeriodicalId":510,"journal":{"name":"Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics","volume":" ","pages":"4409-4421"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-026-02130-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The antioxidant concentration and the redox potential of the oxidizing system employed in antioxidant assays are critical parameters governing the classification of antioxidant reducing power. In this study, we introduce the Superoxide Radical Anion Generated Electrochemically (SRAGE) assay, a novel electrochemical method for evaluating the antioxidant activity of natural compounds. Superoxide is the primary reactive oxygen species generated during the one-electron reduction of molecular oxygen in mitochondria, making it a biologically relevant probe for antioxidant evaluation and a distinct advantage over conventional 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2'-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) discoloration methods.In the SRAGE assay, [Formula: see text]is generated in situ by electrochemical reduction and subsequently scavenged by natural antioxidants, including rutin, ascorbic acid, quercetin, and gallic acid. The controlled generation of superoxide was achieved using cyclic voltammetry and was validated experimentally. At a concentration of 1mmol L- 1, the tested antioxidants exhibited inhibitory activities of 44.30 ± 1.31%, 52.01 ± 0.95%, 78.73 ± 2.02%, and 100.0 ± 0.12%, respectively. The ranking of antioxidant reducing power obtained from the SRAGE assay is in close agreement with that derived from the DPPH method. The proposed SRAGE assay offers a versatile electrochemical platform for evaluating the antioxidant activity of pure compounds and complex systems, including synthetic formulations, biological extracts, pharmaceutical products, and food additives.

利用电化学产生的超氧阴离子评价天然抗氧化活性:SRAGE试验。
抗氧化剂浓度和氧化体系的氧化还原电位是决定抗氧化还原能力分类的关键参数。在本研究中,我们介绍了一种评价天然化合物抗氧化活性的新型电化学方法——超氧自由基阴离子生成电化学(SRAGE)法。超氧化物是线粒体分子氧单电子还原过程中产生的主要活性氧,使其成为抗氧化评价的生物学相关探针,并且比传统的2,2-二苯基-1-吡啶肼(DPPH)和2,2'-氮化萘-(3-乙基苯并噻唑-6-磺酸)(ABTS)变色方法具有明显优势。在SRAGE试验中,[公式:见文本]通过电化学还原在原位生成,随后被天然抗氧化剂清除,包括芦丁、抗坏血酸、槲皮素和没食子酸。利用循环伏安法实现了超氧化物的可控生成,并进行了实验验证。在1mmol L- 1浓度下,抗氧化剂的抑菌活性分别为44.30±1.31%、52.01±0.95%、78.73±2.02%和100.0±0.12%。从SRAGE法得到的抗氧化还原能力的排名与DPPH法得到的结果非常一致。提出的SRAGE分析提供了一个通用的电化学平台,用于评估纯化合物和复杂系统的抗氧化活性,包括合成配方,生物提取物,药品和食品添加剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics (CBB) aims to publish papers on the nature of the biochemical and biophysical mechanisms underlying the structure, control and function of cellular systems The reports should be within the framework of modern biochemistry and chemistry, biophysics and cell physiology, physics and engineering, molecular and structural biology. The relationship between molecular structure and function under investigation is emphasized. Examples of subject areas that CBB publishes are: · biochemical and biophysical aspects of cell structure and function; · interactions of cells and their molecular/macromolecular constituents; · innovative developments in genetic and biomolecular engineering; · computer-based analysis of tissues, cells, cell networks, organelles, and molecular/macromolecular assemblies; · photometric, spectroscopic, microscopic, mechanical, and electrical methodologies/techniques in analytical cytology, cytometry and innovative instrument design For articles that focus on computational aspects, authors should be clear about which docking and molecular dynamics algorithms or software packages are being used as well as details on the system parameterization, simulations conditions etc. In addition, docking calculations (virtual screening, QSAR, etc.) should be validated either by experimental studies or one or more reliable theoretical cross-validation methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书