Integration of PSHA and site response analysis for quantifying liquefaction-induced ground settlements using in-situ testing

Earthquake Research Advances Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.eqrea.2026.100458
Bambang Setiawan, Juellyan Juellyan, Nafisah Al-huda, Alfiansyah Yulianur, Halida Yunita
{"title":"Integration of PSHA and site response analysis for quantifying liquefaction-induced ground settlements using in-situ testing","authors":"Bambang Setiawan,&nbsp;Juellyan Juellyan,&nbsp;Nafisah Al-huda,&nbsp;Alfiansyah Yulianur,&nbsp;Halida Yunita","doi":"10.1016/j.eqrea.2026.100458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Numerous past moderate-to-strong earthquakes have induced soil liquefaction, leading to severe structural damage in many locations worldwide, including in the Aceh Province of Indonesia. This study aims to assess and map the soil liquefaction potential for the city of Meulaboh, Indonesia, by integrating probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) and site response analysis into liquefaction-induced ground settlement using in-situ test data involving the quasi-static cone penetration test (q-CPT). The novelty of this study lies in integrating PSHA with site-response analysis to enhance the liquefaction potential assessment. The adopted method in the present study is outlined as follows. Firstly, PSHA was carried out to quantify the bedrock seismic ground motion, i.e., bedrock peak ground acceleration, in a location by considering all possible seismic occurrences within a certain period. Secondly, to obtain the most representative soil peak ground acceleration, site response analysis was performed using the bedrock peak ground acceleration of PSHA and sub-surface models developed from various sub-surface site investigation methods, i.e., quasi-static cone penetration test (q-CPT), boreholes, and microtremors measurements, across the study area. Finally, a liquefaction assessment was carried out by means of the ground settlements, liquefaction potential index (LPI), and liquefaction severity number (LSN) by considering various seismic hazard scenarios of 10% and 2% probability of exceedance (PoE). Further liquefaction assessments were also carried out in the case of the historical <em>M</em> 9.1 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake and the <em>M</em> 7.5 earthquake scenarios. These scenarios represent the most common and critical seismic magnitude for evaluating liquefaction hazard potential. The worst-case results of the liquefaction assessment in the present study suggests that the estimated ground settlement due to soil liquefaction within the study area (city of Meulaboh) can be up to ∼309 mm, LPI is classified as very high hazard (LPI &gt; 15), and LSN is categorized as moderate to severe (20 &lt; LSN ≤ 30). Based on the spatial distribution analysis by means of maps for all seismic event scenarios, the main vulnerable part of the city of Meulaboh is on the southern tip and along the coastal areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100384,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Research Advances","volume":"6 3","pages":"Article 100458"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Research Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772467026000151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous past moderate-to-strong earthquakes have induced soil liquefaction, leading to severe structural damage in many locations worldwide, including in the Aceh Province of Indonesia. This study aims to assess and map the soil liquefaction potential for the city of Meulaboh, Indonesia, by integrating probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) and site response analysis into liquefaction-induced ground settlement using in-situ test data involving the quasi-static cone penetration test (q-CPT). The novelty of this study lies in integrating PSHA with site-response analysis to enhance the liquefaction potential assessment. The adopted method in the present study is outlined as follows. Firstly, PSHA was carried out to quantify the bedrock seismic ground motion, i.e., bedrock peak ground acceleration, in a location by considering all possible seismic occurrences within a certain period. Secondly, to obtain the most representative soil peak ground acceleration, site response analysis was performed using the bedrock peak ground acceleration of PSHA and sub-surface models developed from various sub-surface site investigation methods, i.e., quasi-static cone penetration test (q-CPT), boreholes, and microtremors measurements, across the study area. Finally, a liquefaction assessment was carried out by means of the ground settlements, liquefaction potential index (LPI), and liquefaction severity number (LSN) by considering various seismic hazard scenarios of 10% and 2% probability of exceedance (PoE). Further liquefaction assessments were also carried out in the case of the historical M 9.1 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake and the M 7.5 earthquake scenarios. These scenarios represent the most common and critical seismic magnitude for evaluating liquefaction hazard potential. The worst-case results of the liquefaction assessment in the present study suggests that the estimated ground settlement due to soil liquefaction within the study area (city of Meulaboh) can be up to ∼309 mm, LPI is classified as very high hazard (LPI > 15), and LSN is categorized as moderate to severe (20 < LSN ≤ 30). Based on the spatial distribution analysis by means of maps for all seismic event scenarios, the main vulnerable part of the city of Meulaboh is on the southern tip and along the coastal areas.
基于PSHA和现场响应分析的液化诱发地面沉降定量分析
过去发生的多次中强地震导致土壤液化,在世界各地的许多地方,包括印度尼西亚的亚齐省,造成了严重的结构破坏。本研究旨在利用拟静态锥入试验(q-CPT)的现场试验数据,通过将概率地震危害分析(PSHA)和现场响应分析整合到液化诱发的地面沉降中,评估和绘制印度尼西亚Meulaboh市的土壤液化潜力。本研究的新颖之处在于将PSHA与现场响应分析相结合,以加强液化潜力的评估。本研究采用的方法概述如下:首先,通过考虑某一时间段内所有可能发生的地震,采用PSHA方法量化某一地点的基岩地震地面运动,即基岩峰值地面加速度。其次,为了获得最具代表性的土壤峰值地面加速度,利用PSHA基岩峰值地面加速度和各种地下现场调查方法(如准静态锥入试验(q-CPT)、钻孔和微震测量)建立的地下模型,对整个研究区域进行了现场响应分析。最后,考虑10%和2%超过概率(PoE)的不同地震灾害情景,通过地面沉降、液化潜力指数(LPI)和液化严重程度数(LSN)进行液化评价。在历史上苏门答腊-安达曼9.1级地震和7.5级地震情景下也进行了进一步的液化评估。这些情景代表了评估液化潜在危害的最常见和最关键的地震震级。本研究液化评估的最坏结果表明,研究区域(Meulaboh市)土壤液化导致的估计地面沉降可达~ 309 mm, LPI为非常高危害(LPI > 15), LSN为中度至重度(LSN≤30)。通过对各地震事件情景的地图空间分布分析,发现墨拉波市的主要易损区位于最南端和沿海地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书