"A Role You can Fill": Education Legitimizes Allied Health and Nursing Roles in Advance Care Planning: A Mixed Methods Study.

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Wendy Kinton, Laine Chilman, Catherine Joyce, Greg Parker, Florin Oprescu, Laura Burritt
{"title":"\"A Role You can Fill\": Education Legitimizes Allied Health and Nursing Roles in Advance Care Planning: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Wendy Kinton, Laine Chilman, Catherine Joyce, Greg Parker, Florin Oprescu, Laura Burritt","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The implementation of advance care planning (ACP) has traditionally been confined to medical officers and specialist nurses. This study evaluated the effect of a multimodal Advance Care Planning Education (ACPEd) program for allied health professionals and generalist nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted within a regional health service in Queensland, Australia, the study used a single-arm, explanatory sequential mixed methods design involving 30 participants completing a three-hour workshop, and a learning circle attended by 10 participants. Quantitative data were collected through preintervention and postintervention surveys assessing perceived confidence, knowledge, skills, and role legitimacy. Qualitative data from the learning circles explored changes in clinical practice and role identity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant improvements were observed in confidence, t (29) = -7.820, P= <.001; knowledge, t (27) = -12.87, P= <.001; and skills, t (29) = -6.814, P= <.001. There was no significant change in perceived health professional roles, t (26) = 2.182, P= .19, indicating a strong belief that all health professional groups have a role in ACP. Three overarching themes emerged: prioritizing ACP, recognizing role legitimacy, and evolving perspectives on engagement. Despite persistent barriers including time constraints and team dynamics, participants demonstrated increased capacity and intent to initiate ACP discussions, with the ACP Tracker a key facilitator for clinical care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings suggest that targeted, interprofessional education may support the development of role identity and legitimacy for ACP among allied health professionals and generalist nurses. The ACPEd program is a scalable model for embedding ACP into practice, with implications for policy and professional development.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000659","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The implementation of advance care planning (ACP) has traditionally been confined to medical officers and specialist nurses. This study evaluated the effect of a multimodal Advance Care Planning Education (ACPEd) program for allied health professionals and generalist nurses.

Methods: Conducted within a regional health service in Queensland, Australia, the study used a single-arm, explanatory sequential mixed methods design involving 30 participants completing a three-hour workshop, and a learning circle attended by 10 participants. Quantitative data were collected through preintervention and postintervention surveys assessing perceived confidence, knowledge, skills, and role legitimacy. Qualitative data from the learning circles explored changes in clinical practice and role identity.

Results: Significant improvements were observed in confidence, t (29) = -7.820, P= <.001; knowledge, t (27) = -12.87, P= <.001; and skills, t (29) = -6.814, P= <.001. There was no significant change in perceived health professional roles, t (26) = 2.182, P= .19, indicating a strong belief that all health professional groups have a role in ACP. Three overarching themes emerged: prioritizing ACP, recognizing role legitimacy, and evolving perspectives on engagement. Despite persistent barriers including time constraints and team dynamics, participants demonstrated increased capacity and intent to initiate ACP discussions, with the ACP Tracker a key facilitator for clinical care.

Discussion: The findings suggest that targeted, interprofessional education may support the development of role identity and legitimacy for ACP among allied health professionals and generalist nurses. The ACPEd program is a scalable model for embedding ACP into practice, with implications for policy and professional development.

“你可以填补的角色”:教育使预先护理计划中的联合健康和护理角色合法化:一项混合方法研究。
导言:传统上,实施预先护理计划(ACP)仅限于医务人员和专科护士。本研究评估了多模式提前护理计划教育(ACPEd)项目对专职医疗人员和全科护士的影响。方法:该研究在澳大利亚昆士兰州的一个地区卫生服务机构进行,采用单臂、解释性顺序混合方法设计,涉及30名参与者完成一个3小时的讲习班,并由10名参与者参加一个学习圈。定量数据通过干预前和干预后的调查收集,评估感知信心、知识、技能和角色合法性。来自学习圈的定性数据探讨了临床实践和角色认同的变化。结果:信心显著提高,t (29) = -7.820, P=讨论:研究结果表明,有针对性的跨专业教育可能支持专职卫生专业人员和全科护士ACP角色认同和合法性的发展。ACPEd计划是将ACP纳入实践的可扩展模型,对政策和专业发展具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书