Nutrient and Discretionary Food Intake in Vegan Adult Australians: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Nutrition Bulletin Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-12 DOI:10.1111/nbu.70065
Linda Smillie, Michelle Minehan, Catherine R Knight-Agarwal
{"title":"Nutrient and Discretionary Food Intake in Vegan Adult Australians: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Linda Smillie, Michelle Minehan, Catherine R Knight-Agarwal","doi":"10.1111/nbu.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interest in plant-based diets, including vegan diets is increasing. Yet, there has been limited assessment of the dietary intake of contemporary vegans in Australia. Sixty-six adult Australian vegans completed a four-day, semi-weighed food diary on two occasions. Intake from diet and supplements and diet alone was compared to the Australian Nutrient Reference Values (NRVs) for selected nutrients. Risk of micronutrient inadequacy was assessed using the cut-point method, with comparison to the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) or Adequate Intake (AI). The contribution of Discretionary Food (DF) intake to total energy intake was examined. A total of 466 days of dietary data were analysed after screening for under-reporting. Macronutrient distribution matched the Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution ranges (AMDR). Total protein intake aligned with measures of adequacy and guidelines for optimal protein intake. Nutrients most at risk in our sample were vitamin B12, calcium, iodine, selenium, zinc and omega-3 fatty acids. Supplementation did not fully resolve under-consumption. DFs contributed 24.2% ± 11.8% to total energy intake. Our data show that macronutrient intake for adult vegans was within acceptable ranges. However, even with the addition of dietary supplements, multiple micronutrients were under-consumed. Theoretically, a well-planned vegan diet can be nutritionally adequate; however support is needed to ensure adequate intake in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48536,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"366-378"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13522859/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.70065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interest in plant-based diets, including vegan diets is increasing. Yet, there has been limited assessment of the dietary intake of contemporary vegans in Australia. Sixty-six adult Australian vegans completed a four-day, semi-weighed food diary on two occasions. Intake from diet and supplements and diet alone was compared to the Australian Nutrient Reference Values (NRVs) for selected nutrients. Risk of micronutrient inadequacy was assessed using the cut-point method, with comparison to the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) or Adequate Intake (AI). The contribution of Discretionary Food (DF) intake to total energy intake was examined. A total of 466 days of dietary data were analysed after screening for under-reporting. Macronutrient distribution matched the Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution ranges (AMDR). Total protein intake aligned with measures of adequacy and guidelines for optimal protein intake. Nutrients most at risk in our sample were vitamin B12, calcium, iodine, selenium, zinc and omega-3 fatty acids. Supplementation did not fully resolve under-consumption. DFs contributed 24.2% ± 11.8% to total energy intake. Our data show that macronutrient intake for adult vegans was within acceptable ranges. However, even with the addition of dietary supplements, multiple micronutrients were under-consumed. Theoretically, a well-planned vegan diet can be nutritionally adequate; however support is needed to ensure adequate intake in practice.

澳大利亚成年素食者的营养和随意食物摄入:一项横断面研究。
对植物性饮食,包括纯素饮食的兴趣正在增加。然而,对澳大利亚当代纯素食者的饮食摄入量的评估有限。66名成年澳大利亚素食者分别完成了为期四天的半称重饮食日记。从饮食和补充剂和饮食单独摄入比较澳大利亚营养参考值(NRVs)选定的营养素。使用切点法评估微量营养素不足的风险,并与估计平均需要量(EAR)或充足摄入量(AI)进行比较。研究了可自由支配食物(DF)摄入量对总能量摄入量的贡献。在筛选漏报后,对总共466天的饮食数据进行了分析。宏量营养素分布符合可接受宏量营养素分布范围(AMDR)。总蛋白质摄入量与适当的措施和最佳蛋白质摄入量指南一致。在我们的样本中,风险最大的营养素是维生素B12、钙、碘、硒、锌和omega-3脂肪酸。补充剂并不能完全解决摄入不足的问题。DFs占总能量摄入的24.2%±11.8%。我们的数据显示,成年素食者的常量营养素摄入量在可接受的范围内。然而,即使添加了膳食补充剂,多种微量营养素仍摄入不足。从理论上讲,计划良好的纯素饮食可以营养充足;然而,在实践中需要支持以确保足够的摄入量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition Bulletin
Nutrition Bulletin NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.10%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Nutrition Bulletin provides accessible reviews at the cutting edge of research. Read by researchers and nutritionists working in universities and research institutes; public health nutritionists, dieticians and other health professionals; nutritionists, technologists and others in the food industry; those engaged in higher education including students; and journalists with an interest in nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书