Early Electroencephalographic Background Evolution as a Predictor of Airway Outcomes in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot Study.

IF 2 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Adnan Qadri, Soumya N Maiti, Eman A Khan, Immia Bukhari, Duha Wani
{"title":"Early Electroencephalographic Background Evolution as a Predictor of Airway Outcomes in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Adnan Qadri, Soumya N Maiti, Eman A Khan, Immia Bukhari, Duha Wani","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-25220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Determining the optimal timing for extubation or tracheostomy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains challenging. Standard weaning criteria often fail to account for neurological readiness, leading to high rates of extubation failure. This study evaluated whether the evolution of electroencephalography (EEG) background activity over the first 96 hours could predict airway outcomes better than standard clinical assessments.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational study on 43 patients with severe TBI requiring mechanical ventilation. Electroencephalography recordings were obtained on admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and at 96 hours. Background activity was classified as improving (alpha/beta dominance) or non-improving (theta/delta dominance). The primary outcome was successful extubation vs extubation failure (defined as re-intubation or need for tracheostomy).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 43 patients, 25 (58%) were successfully extubated, while 18 (42%) failed. Dominant EEG frequency at 96 hours was a powerful predictor of outcome. Patients with improving alpha/beta backgrounds demonstrated a positive predictive value (PPV) of 92.9% for successful extubation. Conversely, persistent theta/delta slowing was significantly associated with extubation failure [odds ratio (OR): 18.41; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.1-160.3; <i>p</i> = 0.008], regardless of the patient's age (<i>p</i> = 0.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early improvement in EEG background activity is a robust indicator of airway competence in severe TBI. A non-improving EEG warrants caution, while an improving background suggests that tracheostomy may be judiciously deferred to allow for successful extubation. Integrating serial EEG into weaning protocols may prevent unnecessary surgical interventions and reduce extubation failure rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":47664,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"30 7","pages":"585-590"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13457895/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-25220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Determining the optimal timing for extubation or tracheostomy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains challenging. Standard weaning criteria often fail to account for neurological readiness, leading to high rates of extubation failure. This study evaluated whether the evolution of electroencephalography (EEG) background activity over the first 96 hours could predict airway outcomes better than standard clinical assessments.

Patients and methods: We conducted a prospective observational study on 43 patients with severe TBI requiring mechanical ventilation. Electroencephalography recordings were obtained on admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and at 96 hours. Background activity was classified as improving (alpha/beta dominance) or non-improving (theta/delta dominance). The primary outcome was successful extubation vs extubation failure (defined as re-intubation or need for tracheostomy).

Results: Of the 43 patients, 25 (58%) were successfully extubated, while 18 (42%) failed. Dominant EEG frequency at 96 hours was a powerful predictor of outcome. Patients with improving alpha/beta backgrounds demonstrated a positive predictive value (PPV) of 92.9% for successful extubation. Conversely, persistent theta/delta slowing was significantly associated with extubation failure [odds ratio (OR): 18.41; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.1-160.3; p = 0.008], regardless of the patient's age (p = 0.42).

Conclusion: Early improvement in EEG background activity is a robust indicator of airway competence in severe TBI. A non-improving EEG warrants caution, while an improving background suggests that tracheostomy may be judiciously deferred to allow for successful extubation. Integrating serial EEG into weaning protocols may prevent unnecessary surgical interventions and reduce extubation failure rates.

早期脑电图背景进化作为严重创伤性脑损伤气道预后的预测因子:一项初步研究。
背景和目的:确定严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者拔管或气管切开术的最佳时机仍然具有挑战性。标准的脱机标准往往不能考虑到神经准备情况,导致拔管失败率很高。本研究评估了前96小时脑电图(EEG)背景活动的演变是否比标准临床评估更能预测气道预后。患者和方法:我们对43例需要机械通气的严重TBI患者进行了前瞻性观察研究。在进入重症监护病房(ICU)和96小时时进行脑电图记录。背景活动被分为改善型(α / β优势)和非改善型(θ / δ优势)。主要结果是拔管成功vs拔管失败(定义为再次插管或需要气管切开术)。结果:43例患者中25例(58%)拔管成功,18例(42%)拔管失败。96小时的优势脑电图频率是预后的有力预测因子。alpha/beta背景改善的患者成功拔管的阳性预测值(PPV)为92.9%。相反,持续的θ / δ减慢与拔管失败显著相关[优势比(OR): 18.41;95%置信区间(CI): 2.1 ~ 160.3;P = 0.008],与患者年龄无关(P = 0.42)。结论:早期脑电图背景活动的改善是严重脑外伤患者气道功能的一个可靠指标。无改善的脑电图需要谨慎,而改善的背景提示气管切开术可以明智地推迟,以允许成功拔管。将连续脑电图整合到脱机方案中可以防止不必要的手术干预并降低拔管失败率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (ISSN 0972-5229) is specialty periodical published under the auspices of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Journal encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the fields of critical and emergency medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书