Comparison of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Cold-vibration Distraction on Pain Perception during Local Anesthesia in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Q3 Dentistry
Nishtha Sardana, Nitika Bajaj, Meenu Bhola
{"title":"Comparison of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Cold-vibration Distraction on Pain Perception during Local Anesthesia in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Nishtha Sardana, Nitika Bajaj, Meenu Bhola","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Minimizing discomfort during administration of local anesthetics is crucial in pediatric dentistry to enhance cooperation and help create a pleasant experience for young patients. Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies are used to reduce injection-related pain. This study aimed to assess and compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and cold-vibration distraction technique on pain perception during administration of local anesthesia in children.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ninety cooperative children aged 5-10 years who required local anesthesia for dental treatment were randomly assigned to three groups: group I (TENS), group II (cold-vibration distraction), and group III (conventional syringe). Pain scores were obtained pre and post-administration of local anesthesia using the Wong-Baker faces and FLACC behavioral pain scales. The collected data were evaluated through descriptive and inferential statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three groups demonstrated an increase in pain scores after local anesthetic administration; however, the increase in scores was significantly lower in group I and group II compared with the conventional syringe group (group III). Among the interventions, group II achieved the highest acceptance from the children and appeared to be the most effective at interrupting pain transmission. No statistically significant difference was found between the outcomes of groups I and II.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both TENS and the cold-vibration distraction technique were effective in lowering perceived pain associated with local anesthetic injections in pediatric dental patients.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Integrating TENS or cold-vibration distraction device into pediatric dental care can improve patient comfort, enhance cooperation, and contribute to more positive dental experiences for children.The study is registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2024/08/072603).</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"19 7","pages":"894-898"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13458039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Minimizing discomfort during administration of local anesthetics is crucial in pediatric dentistry to enhance cooperation and help create a pleasant experience for young patients. Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies are used to reduce injection-related pain. This study aimed to assess and compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and cold-vibration distraction technique on pain perception during administration of local anesthesia in children.

Materials and methods: Ninety cooperative children aged 5-10 years who required local anesthesia for dental treatment were randomly assigned to three groups: group I (TENS), group II (cold-vibration distraction), and group III (conventional syringe). Pain scores were obtained pre and post-administration of local anesthesia using the Wong-Baker faces and FLACC behavioral pain scales. The collected data were evaluated through descriptive and inferential statistical methods.

Results: All three groups demonstrated an increase in pain scores after local anesthetic administration; however, the increase in scores was significantly lower in group I and group II compared with the conventional syringe group (group III). Among the interventions, group II achieved the highest acceptance from the children and appeared to be the most effective at interrupting pain transmission. No statistically significant difference was found between the outcomes of groups I and II.

Conclusion: Both TENS and the cold-vibration distraction technique were effective in lowering perceived pain associated with local anesthetic injections in pediatric dental patients.

Clinical significance: Integrating TENS or cold-vibration distraction device into pediatric dental care can improve patient comfort, enhance cooperation, and contribute to more positive dental experiences for children.The study is registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2024/08/072603).

经皮神经电刺激和冷振动牵张对儿童局部麻醉疼痛感知的影响:一项随机对照试验。
目的:减少局部麻醉过程中的不适是儿科牙科加强合作和帮助年轻患者创造愉快体验的关键。药物和非药物策略都用于减少注射相关的疼痛。本研究旨在评估和比较经皮神经电刺激(TENS)和冷振动牵张技术对儿童局部麻醉疼痛感知的影响。材料与方法:将90例5 ~ 10岁需要局部麻醉的合作儿童随机分为三组:I组(TENS)、II组(冷振牵引)和III组(常规注射器)。采用Wong-Baker面部和FLACC行为疼痛量表获得局部麻醉前后的疼痛评分。通过描述性和推断性统计方法对收集的数据进行评估。结果:三组患者局麻后疼痛评分均有所增加;然而,与常规注射器组(III组)相比,I组和II组的评分增加明显较低。在干预措施中,第二组获得了儿童最高的接受度,似乎在中断疼痛传播方面最有效。I组和II组的结果无统计学差异。结论:TENS和冷振动牵张技术均能有效降低小儿牙科患者局麻注射相关的感知疼痛。临床意义:将TENS或冷振动牵引装置纳入儿童牙科护理中,可提高患者舒适度,增强合作,为儿童带来更积极的牙科体验。该研究已在印度临床试验注册中心注册(CTRI/ 20124/08/072603)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书