Aligning emergency admission and stroke center catchment areas: Association with intravenous thrombolysis rates.

IF 2.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
SAGE Open Medicine Pub Date : 2026-08-10 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20503121261477313
Martin Faurholdt Gude, Thomas Basse, Arne Sylvester Rønde Jensen, Ulla Væggemose, Mohammad Ahmad Al-Jazi, Paul von Weitzel-Mudersbach, Rolf Ankerlund Blauenfeldt
{"title":"Aligning emergency admission and stroke center catchment areas: Association with intravenous thrombolysis rates.","authors":"Martin Faurholdt Gude, Thomas Basse, Arne Sylvester Rønde Jensen, Ulla Væggemose, Mohammad Ahmad Al-Jazi, Paul von Weitzel-Mudersbach, Rolf Ankerlund Blauenfeldt","doi":"10.1177/20503121261477313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess whether co-location of a Primary Stroke Center (PSC) and an Emergency Department (ED) was associated with higher intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) rates after alignment of emergency admission pathways in the Central Denmark Region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective before-and-after cohort study compared two 6-month periods before (July 1 to December 31, 2021) and after (July 1 to December 31, 2022) co-location following a hospital merger in February 2022. Patients were identified through the Danish Stroke Center Database and linked with prehospital records. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with IVT. Secondary analyses included stroke mimic admissions and transport subgroups. Absolute risk differences were estimated using linear regression with robust variance estimation, and adjusted analyses used inverse probability weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 1,950 patients with suspected stroke: 1,059 before and 891 after co-location. Among 914 patients with AIS, the IVT rate increased by 4.6 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-9.1), from 12.2% (95% CI 9.2-15.2) before co-location. This increase was driven by EMS-transported patients following emergency calls, in whom the IVT rate increased by 10.2 percentage points (95% CI 0.5-19.9). In this subgroup, median door-to-needle time increased from 26.5 to 40.0 minutes (p=0.003). Stroke mimic admissions decreased from 26.3% to 17.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Co-location of the PSC and ED was associated with higher IVT rates, particularly among EMS-transported emergency-call patients, suggesting that alignment of emergency admission pathways and stroke center catchment areas may improve access to time-critical reperfusion therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21398,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medicine","volume":"14 ","pages":"20503121261477313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13458115/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121261477313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess whether co-location of a Primary Stroke Center (PSC) and an Emergency Department (ED) was associated with higher intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) rates after alignment of emergency admission pathways in the Central Denmark Region.

Methods: This retrospective before-and-after cohort study compared two 6-month periods before (July 1 to December 31, 2021) and after (July 1 to December 31, 2022) co-location following a hospital merger in February 2022. Patients were identified through the Danish Stroke Center Database and linked with prehospital records. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with IVT. Secondary analyses included stroke mimic admissions and transport subgroups. Absolute risk differences were estimated using linear regression with robust variance estimation, and adjusted analyses used inverse probability weighting.

Results: The study included 1,950 patients with suspected stroke: 1,059 before and 891 after co-location. Among 914 patients with AIS, the IVT rate increased by 4.6 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-9.1), from 12.2% (95% CI 9.2-15.2) before co-location. This increase was driven by EMS-transported patients following emergency calls, in whom the IVT rate increased by 10.2 percentage points (95% CI 0.5-19.9). In this subgroup, median door-to-needle time increased from 26.5 to 40.0 minutes (p=0.003). Stroke mimic admissions decreased from 26.3% to 17.9%.

Conclusion: Co-location of the PSC and ED was associated with higher IVT rates, particularly among EMS-transported emergency-call patients, suggesting that alignment of emergency admission pathways and stroke center catchment areas may improve access to time-critical reperfusion therapy.

调整急诊入院和卒中中心集水区:与静脉溶栓率的关系。
目的:评估原发性卒中中心(PSC)和急诊科(ED)的同址是否与丹麦中部地区急诊入院途径对齐后静脉溶栓(IVT)率升高有关。方法:这项回顾性前后队列研究比较了2022年2月医院合并后共址前(2021年7月1日至12月31日)和共址后(2022年7月1日至12月31日)的两个6个月期间。通过丹麦中风中心数据库确定患者,并与院前记录相关联。主要终点是急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者接受IVT治疗的比例。二次分析包括卒中模拟入院和转运亚组。绝对风险差异的估计使用线性回归和稳健方差估计,调整分析使用逆概率加权。结果:该研究纳入1,950例疑似卒中患者:共定位前1,059例,共定位后891例。在914名AIS患者中,IVT率从共定位前的12.2% (95% CI 9.2-15.2)增加了4.6个百分点(95%置信区间[CI] 0.1-9.1)。这一增长是由紧急呼叫后通过ems转运的患者推动的,其中IVT率增加了10.2个百分点(95% CI 0.5-19.9)。在这个亚组中,从门到针的中位时间从26.5分钟增加到40.0分钟(p=0.003)。中风模拟入院率从26.3%下降到17.9%。结论:PSC和ED的同一位置与更高的IVT率相关,特别是在ems运送的急诊呼叫患者中,这表明急诊入院路径和卒中中心集水区域的对齐可能会改善时间关键的再灌注治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SAGE Open Medicine
SAGE Open Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书