Hue T T Tran, Duc V Le, Raslina Shrestha, Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez, Clark C Otley, Giang Huong Nguyen
{"title":"Surgical management and outcomes in localized vulvar basal cell carcinoma: a National Cancer Database Study.","authors":"Hue T T Tran, Duc V Le, Raslina Shrestha, Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez, Clark C Otley, Giang Huong Nguyen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2026.104849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We evaluated factors associated with positive surgical margins and overall survival in localized vulvar basal cell carcinoma using the National Cancer Database (2004-2023). Patients with localized vulvar basal cell carcinoma undergoing surgical resection were included. Multi-variable logistic regression identified factors associated with positive margins. Overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multi-variable Cox regression. Among 2998 patients, 249 (8.3%) had positive margins. Older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.022 per year, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.008 to 1.035), tumor size >20 mm (aOR 2.451, 95% CI 1.169 to 5.139), basosquamous histology (aOR 1.873, 95% CI 1.071 to 3.275), and organ-sparing surgery (aOR 2.224, 95% CI 1.686 to 2.933) were independently associated with positive margins. Five-year overall survival was 81.79% after organ-sparing surgery, 82.75% after partial vulvectomy, and 73.30% after radical vulvectomy (log-rankp= .0013). In adjusted analyses, organ-sparing surgery was not associated with worse overall survival compared with partial vulvectomy, whereas radical vulvectomy was associated with worse survival (aHR 1.348; 95% CI 1.034 to 1.757). Organ-sparing surgery is associated with higher odds of positive margins but is not associated with worse overall survival in adjusted analyses compared with partial vulvectomy. These findings may help inform surgical decision-making in vulvar basal cell carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"36 9","pages":"104849"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2026.104849","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We evaluated factors associated with positive surgical margins and overall survival in localized vulvar basal cell carcinoma using the National Cancer Database (2004-2023). Patients with localized vulvar basal cell carcinoma undergoing surgical resection were included. Multi-variable logistic regression identified factors associated with positive margins. Overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multi-variable Cox regression. Among 2998 patients, 249 (8.3%) had positive margins. Older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.022 per year, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.008 to 1.035), tumor size >20 mm (aOR 2.451, 95% CI 1.169 to 5.139), basosquamous histology (aOR 1.873, 95% CI 1.071 to 3.275), and organ-sparing surgery (aOR 2.224, 95% CI 1.686 to 2.933) were independently associated with positive margins. Five-year overall survival was 81.79% after organ-sparing surgery, 82.75% after partial vulvectomy, and 73.30% after radical vulvectomy (log-rankp= .0013). In adjusted analyses, organ-sparing surgery was not associated with worse overall survival compared with partial vulvectomy, whereas radical vulvectomy was associated with worse survival (aHR 1.348; 95% CI 1.034 to 1.757). Organ-sparing surgery is associated with higher odds of positive margins but is not associated with worse overall survival in adjusted analyses compared with partial vulvectomy. These findings may help inform surgical decision-making in vulvar basal cell carcinoma.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.