Postintensive Care Frailty of Older Patients With Septic Shock: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-12 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000007304
Ryo Yamamoto, Takahiro Yamanaka, Daiki Kaito, Akia Endo, Kazuma Yamakawa, Takashi Tagami, Yutaka Umemura, Junichi Sasaki
{"title":"Postintensive Care Frailty of Older Patients With Septic Shock: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Ryo Yamamoto, Takahiro Yamanaka, Daiki Kaito, Akia Endo, Kazuma Yamakawa, Takashi Tagami, Yutaka Umemura, Junichi Sasaki","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000007304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Postintensive care frailty impairs quality of life in survivors of severe illness. While anabolic hormone deficiency and prolonged inflammation are considered key physiologic mechanisms, specific features associated with frailty progression remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate clinical characteristics associated with frailty deterioration following recovery from septic shock in older adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>ICUs in Japan.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults of 65 years or older with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Data were analyzed from a randomized controlled trial investigating optimal blood pressure targets in patients of 65 years or older with septic shock. Frailty at 90 days after intensive care was classified as no-to-mild, moderate, and severe based on the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) scores of less than or equal to 4, 5-6, and greater than or equal to 7, respectively. Baseline characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were compared across these frailty categories. Factors associated with postintensive care frailty were identified using ordinal logistic regression fitted with a generalized estimating equation model. Among 513 eligible patients, 339 patients survived to 90 days; 103 patients (30.4%) had no-to-mild frailty, 114 patients (33.6%) had moderate frailty, and 122 patients (36.0%) had severe frailty, respectively. Higher presepsis CFS scores (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.03 [1.72-2.40] per 1-point increase; p < 0.001), higher sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores (aOR, 1.16 [1.06-1.26] per 1-point increase; p < 0.001), and corticosteroid use (aOR, 1.72 [1.14-2.61]; p < 0.001) were independently associated with frailty. Subgroup analyses revealed that corticosteroid use was associated with frailty deterioration in patients with baseline frailty (CFS ≥ 5), whereas SOFA scores were associated with frailty in patients with tissue hypoperfusion (lactate, ≥ 2 mmol/L).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Baseline frailty before sepsis, organ dysfunction severity, and corticosteroid therapy independently predict severe postintensive care frailty in older adults with septic shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2660-2669"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000007304","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Postintensive care frailty impairs quality of life in survivors of severe illness. While anabolic hormone deficiency and prolonged inflammation are considered key physiologic mechanisms, specific features associated with frailty progression remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate clinical characteristics associated with frailty deterioration following recovery from septic shock in older adults.

Design: Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Setting: ICUs in Japan.

Patients: Adults of 65 years or older with septic shock.

Measurements and main results: Data were analyzed from a randomized controlled trial investigating optimal blood pressure targets in patients of 65 years or older with septic shock. Frailty at 90 days after intensive care was classified as no-to-mild, moderate, and severe based on the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) scores of less than or equal to 4, 5-6, and greater than or equal to 7, respectively. Baseline characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were compared across these frailty categories. Factors associated with postintensive care frailty were identified using ordinal logistic regression fitted with a generalized estimating equation model. Among 513 eligible patients, 339 patients survived to 90 days; 103 patients (30.4%) had no-to-mild frailty, 114 patients (33.6%) had moderate frailty, and 122 patients (36.0%) had severe frailty, respectively. Higher presepsis CFS scores (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.03 [1.72-2.40] per 1-point increase; p < 0.001), higher sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores (aOR, 1.16 [1.06-1.26] per 1-point increase; p < 0.001), and corticosteroid use (aOR, 1.72 [1.14-2.61]; p < 0.001) were independently associated with frailty. Subgroup analyses revealed that corticosteroid use was associated with frailty deterioration in patients with baseline frailty (CFS ≥ 5), whereas SOFA scores were associated with frailty in patients with tissue hypoperfusion (lactate, ≥ 2 mmol/L).

Conclusions: Baseline frailty before sepsis, organ dysfunction severity, and corticosteroid therapy independently predict severe postintensive care frailty in older adults with septic shock.

老年感染性休克患者重症监护后虚弱:一项多中心随机对照试验的事后分析
目的:重症监护后的虚弱会影响重症幸存者的生活质量。虽然合成代谢激素缺乏和长期炎症被认为是关键的生理机制,但与虚弱进展相关的具体特征仍不清楚。本研究旨在阐明与老年人感染性休克恢复后虚弱恶化相关的临床特征。设计:随机对照试验的事后分析。场景:日本的icu。患者:65岁以上感染性休克的成年人。测量和主要结果:数据分析来自一项随机对照试验,研究65岁及以上脓毒性休克患者的最佳血压目标。根据临床虚弱量表(CFS)评分小于或等于4分、5-6分和大于或等于7分,重症监护后90天虚弱分为无至轻度、中度和重度。基线特征、治疗和结果在这些虚弱类别之间进行比较。与重症监护后虚弱相关的因素被确定使用与广义估计方程模型拟合的有序逻辑回归。513例符合条件的患者中,339例存活至90天;无至轻度虚弱103例(30.4%),中度虚弱114例(33.6%),重度虚弱122例(36.0%)。较高的败血症前CFS评分(校正优势比[aOR],每增加1分2.03 [1.72-2.40],p < 0.001)、较高的顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分(aOR,每增加1分1.16 [1.06-1.26],p < 0.001)和皮质类固醇使用(aOR, 1.72 [1.14-2.61], p < 0.001)与虚弱独立相关。亚组分析显示,皮质类固醇的使用与基线虚弱(CFS≥5)患者的虚弱恶化相关,而SOFA评分与组织灌注不足(乳酸,≥2 mmol/L)患者的虚弱相关。结论:败血症前的基线虚弱、器官功能障碍严重程度和皮质类固醇治疗独立预测老年人感染性休克重症监护后的严重虚弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书